Hi Totto,Hi Skydiver! I am sorry to have to tell you beer is a bad idea when diabetic. There are a few low carb beers but they are so booring so not worth the effort. Basically, beer is liquid bread and bad for us. Wine, on the other had is fine so long as it is dry.
I found out how bad beer is through my bg meter. So very few beer for me. I keep testing to take control. I probably will have a few beers per year, next time at midsummer.Hi Totto,
Thanks for replying to this "diabetes sufferer". Would still refer some meat to put on the bones in the shape of "facts and figures". Any accurate ones out there ? E.G. One pint of common or garden lager equals X grams of sugar.
http://www.diabetesaustralia.com.au/PageFiles/18417/11.09.20 DA position statement.pdfThe term ‘diabetic’ defines the individual as their health condition. It is better to emphasise the person’s ability to live with diabetes. Labelling someone as ‘diabetic’ positions diabetes as the defining factor of their life.
Tanks for that. I'm getting closer and closer to achieving a straightforward answer.This is my contribution.
http://andykennyfitness.ie/sugar-calories-in-beer-stout-cider/
.I've tried getting answers from the internet and have ended up so confused I've disappeared up my own rectum.
Here's a challenge. Try finding out just how much sugar there is in a pint. There's just no standardisation anywhere. I've initially tried writing to "Stewarts" brewery to ask the sugar content of a pint of 'heavy'...still awaiting a reply after a week. Wrote to Caledonian Brewery asking the same thing about a pint of 'Deuchars 80/-'. I got a reply five days later where they've declared they aint got a Scooby but "best to avoid drinking it as there's a lot of sugar from the malt content, sorry to disappoint".
Some tables give you the 'carbohydrate' content..that's great 'cos there's no mention of sugar at all, yippee, I can get rat ***** tonight ! Seriously though there's a lot of conflicting information out there, giving us all a "bum steer". would it be too much to ask that this information be readily available to the consumer ?
While I'm griping, here's one aimed at you B.D.A.
Why, throughout your site, do YOU repeatedly refer to me as a 'diabetic'? Do me a favour ! STOP referring to ME as though I'm a walking disease. I am a HUMAN. YOU should know better, TIDY UP YOUR ACT. If I had a limp, would you say "hello, I understand you are a cripple" or to an asthma sufferer "you are an asthmatic" ? If you were in company would you say "meet John, he is an epileptic" of perhaps, "this is Mary, she is a Leper" ?
The press are the biggest culprits. Not to mention our good old N.H.S.your local dentist or optician. If you have any clout B.D.A., please campaign about correcting the aforementioned on our behalf.
Just for the record, I have type 2 diabetes (late onset). I have never had a "sweet tooth" and have always had a figure resembling a yard of pumpwater. So whenever I see the press referring to me as an overweight couch potato who has burdened the N.H.S. with a "self-inflicted" condition, I get angry.
And personally I think I would much rather someone said to me "Hello, I understand you are diabetic" than "I understand you are a person with diabetes" which not only sounds clumsy but slightly patronizing.
Surely there is hardly any "sugar" in beer because that is what gets put in at the start is converted to alcohol by the fermentation process so very little should remain in the end product. Which would be why tables will list carbohydrates rather than sugar. It would be like measuring a vehicle's exhaust emissions in petrol.
On the other matter, the dictionary definition of the term "diabetic," as with all similar "-ic" forms of medical conditions, is both an adjective meaning relating to the condition and a noun meaning a person with the condition. You could say "person with diabetes" instead, but that will get very annoying and very tedious with repeat use.
And personally I think I would much rather someone said to me "Hello, I understand you are diabetic" than "I understand you are a person with diabetes" which not only sounds clumsy but slightly patronizing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?