Winnie53
BANNED
- Messages
- 2,374
- Type of diabetes
- Type 2
- Treatment type
- Diet only
@ChrisSamsDad Did you read the report I provided you a link to earlier in this thread?
@ChrisSamsDad I'm not taking my chances with your belief that glyphosate contamination of our food supply is safe or wise. I've listened to enough experts who don't have a financial interest in the ongoing debate, that is still ongoing for more than 20 years, to be convinced that glyphosate is harming us.
We all have a choice when it comes to the food we eat. You've made yours, and I've made mine.
Don't make me post a picture of my flabby bits. Also, while I CAN fit into 30in jeans it does require a bit of wiggling. I might wait a month before actually buying them.I have a couple sons your height and I would be seriously concerned if their waist size was the same as yours. Maybe you have a different bone frame.
Glyphosate is one of the safest insecticides, both for humans and the environment and because it's being banned, it's forcing farmers to use worse alternatives when they'd prefer it. Every farmer uses insecticides, even organic farmers who use much more poisonous substances.....Do you know how much the organic industry is worth? How much it spends on lobbying and research - you probably use the phrase 'Big Pharma' but 'Big Organic' is actually a thing too.
Not sure I understand the point being made here. Diabetes caused by carbs, organic foods generally equals carbs, both carbs and organic foods increasing seems entirely plausible! What am.I missing?I've seen it before and it's been heavily and widely criticised for implying correlation = causation and bad mistakes in its statistical analysis. The pre-amble should be enough to convince you that it's an opinion piece rather than a true study, and on top of that, it's not in a reputable journal, which is open-access, not peer-reviewed and not listed in PubMed.
This is known as cargo-cult science - you dress up your fake or flawed study with the trappings of proper science and hope people mistake it for the real thing.
More here:
http://www.statsblogs.com/2014/12/0...-genetically-engineered-crops-to-22-diseases/
Also, this very insignificant opinion paper flies in the face of much better, larger scale evidence, looking back at billions of animal meals containing GMO food, which shows no such effect over a large number of years. This is a good summary: http://www.forbes.com/sites/jonenti...ks-to-a-new-trillion-meal-study/#76bd61f7ca93
The problem with correlation vs causation, can be seen here, this a graph of organic food sales vs growth in diabetes
Whilst on holiday this year I got talking with someone who said that he had really bad skin condition, which had for years He had been taking blackseed oil for months and had noticed a huge improvement in his skin condition.
I have read a few articles on internet about this and seemingly it is the remedy for everything except depth.
Reading the blurbs on this it claims to help with type 2 diabetes and can also assist with high blood pressure.
Now before i try this, I will try anything once, is this one big con or is it actually any good. Have you seen an improvement
Thanks