Hi CatManRob,
Sorry to disappoint you on your uniqueness. A Veggie version of LCHF is still as much LCHF as a Carnivore version. So I think you are wrong when you say you are the first to do it. Many people from India/Pakistan are vegetarians, and I know several have been doing LCHF - so I am 99% sure that you aren't even in the first 100 to do so. But since Vegetarians and Vegans are still in the minority in the UK (though in the majority in LaMolina, USA - one of the so-called Blue Zones where people live longer), nobody has yet found enough to do an exclusive study on them.
Veggie LCHF is quite do-able, however Vegan LCHF is very tough because substituting beans for protein instead of Egg and Cheese, raises the total Carb intake!
Or are you talking about a Moderate Carb High Fat version - again that has been done before since some T2's can tolerate much more Carbs than others.
I personally had a 3x Coronary Artery Bypass in December 2016 and I'm very thankful that I can do ( and actually do) LCHF without giving up fatty meat. Because all the recent evidence shows that LCHF lowers Triglycerides which together with damaged LDL (not usually picked up on Lipid Test) and 'Remnant Cholesterol' are the really bad particles in your Blood. Several researchers (reputable Medical professionals) have claimed that blaming LDL for CVD is like blaming Policemen for crime - because they are almost always seen at the scene.
What do you mean about there being no broccoli lobby? Most (non-carnivore) LCHF adherents use both broccoli and cauliflower as rice substitutes (known as cauliflower rice and broccoli rice). You can even buy 'cauliflower rice' in supermarkets.
Are you testing before and after meals with a Blood Glucose Meter? - If not, since you are attempting to control T2D with diet alone, I strongly suggest that you do so. It is crazy that the NHS expect people to manage their T2D by diet when only having their Glucose checked with months between Hba1c tests.
There are no medical clinical trials recorded studying a higher fat diet that is purely based on non-animal based products. Maybe you misunderstood. And yes, I do know other people in the past have been vegetarians. Nobody has studied a medical trial is the point I am making, and I've searched the medical literature. That was the point I was making, not that I'm the first person who discovered what an avocado is, obviously.
You know the liver makes the cholesterol I assume?
I think you also misunderstood my comment regarding a 'Brocolli lobby'. I meant that in that there's no lobby up on the hill that is lobbying for broccoli consumption, unlike the meat and dairy industries. I'm not advocating eating one way or another, it's everyone's choice how they want to eat, but if you look up how autophagy works, and how antioxidants work by providing a receptor for pulling out the muck from arterial plaque, if you want to listen to a cardiologist then contact Dr. Caudwell Esselstyn at the Cleveland clinic and look how he's reversed peoples heart disease. It's impressive data and you can read all about it for yourself in his book "How to Prevent & Cure Heart Disease".
I'm not interested in a debate on the pro's and cons of peoples dietary choices. I'll simply direct you to the data ad if you want to argue with the man who conducted the study at the Cleveland Clinic be my guest!
I absolutely agree regarding LDL by the way, and mine is double what I should be, but I'm inured, in pain and the function of the cholesterol is to obviously be the building blocks of hormones & the repair mechanism of the body. I'm not interested in particle size either, but what I'm most concerned with is getting the arterial plaque out, so I'll eat broccoli till the cows come home if I have to.
I found a video by an anesthesiologist a Dr. Micheal Klapper on the LDL/Endotheliam subject yesterday on Youtube yesterday by coincidence, but I cannot post links yet as I haven't posted enough. If you want to learn more about protecting the endothelium & removing the plaque from the arteries, this would be a good place to start and it will save me explaining the biochemistry as his presentation was pretty good. He would also agree regarding the elevated levels of cholesterol, LDL level and particle size etc as if you watch the video yourself you'll be aware and see some surgical clips of fat being pulled out by tweezers during an operation, while a patient has his chest cavity cracked open.
I don't know how people do the operations carving up humans themselves, but I take my hat off to them that they are able to do it. And if I have the choice of having my chest cracked open, or start eating broccoli and cauliflower as a preventative measure, I'm definitely going that to do that!
It's an interesting presentation, & highly informative, from a qualified professional. Therefore, i'll listen to what he has to say! If anyone wants to debate about inflammation or ask me to post links for you, please instead of asking me to provide medical data, which your not paying me to do, please go over to good old Youtube, and look for practically any video with Dr. Micheal Klapper and if you disagree from there, please direct your comments towards him.
He may enjoy the arguments. He may enjoy educating the public. But I'm only interested in preferably large scale, well funded clinical research that's in the public domain, from reliable sources such as the BMJ, The Lancet, PubMed, and the various nutritional journals, which are peer-reviewed & can be replicated.
And if you want to shortcut a huge learning curve, feel free to ask me a question, but if you want me to search 'Pubmed' for a clinical study to provide a quote so people can argue on an internet forum I'm really not interested! This isn't directed to you specifically, but in general, as it's my experience people will argue about the weather on the internet, never mind medical research!
Quite simply, you have to take some responsibility and you'll learn more by studying the medical literature without some poor sod like me being asked to find you a link on 'Elsevier.com' that's behind a paywall that you won't be able to read unless you pay $6 for a copy of the document or whatever it is for the relevant medical research papers.
I'll do it for the purpose of publishing, where there's a point, but not where people want to debate pointlessly on the internet.
That would be a waste of my time, wouldn't it? I'm quite surprised so far by some of the things that are asked, such as the side effects of Metformin, which are available by a simple 'google' search.
My diet modality is based on medical evidence, and best advice, but I might still get hit by a bus crossing the road in the morning. But that's life.
It must have been quite unnerving having the bypasses.