There are two problems with the SureScreen test.
It is too cheap - how could it possibly be any good at only £6?
The main problem though is that it is not blind - the subject sees the result.
All the Billions that is being spent on CoV and for £6 you could find out yourself, whenever you want!
The accuracy that some are moaning about is far above what PWD are used too. It is actually two tests that are run simultaneously- one is 99.6% accurate - and only one of them is needed for a positive result. If 99.6% is not “good enough”, just run a second (double) test after an hour.
A 99.6% Accurate blood prick is something we can only dream of.
https://www.surescreen.com/products/covid-19-coronavirus-rapid-test-cassette
It is too cheap - how could it possibly be any good at only £6?
The main problem though is that it is not blind - the subject sees the result.
All the Billions that is being spent on CoV and for £6 you could find out yourself, whenever you want!
The accuracy that some are moaning about is far above what PWD are used too. It is actually two tests that are run simultaneously- one is 99.6% accurate - and only one of them is needed for a positive result. If 99.6% is not “good enough”, just run a second (double) test after an hour.
A 99.6% Accurate blood prick is something we can only dream of.
https://www.surescreen.com/products/covid-19-coronavirus-rapid-test-cassette
Last edited: