For some purposes, when I want an accurate idea of blood glucose levels, I'll take 3 readings at a time in an attempt to overcome the inaccuracy of my meter (it claims to be accurate to +/- 20%).
Sometimes all three readings are the same or 0.1 mmol/l out, which is nice.
Sometimes however they are quite a broad spread, say for example 5.1, 5.5, 6.1. In this case taking an average seems like a very good idea.
However sometimes it seems more like there is a 'rogue result'. The most recent 3 readings I got were 9.4, 8.1, 8.1.
I've logged down the average as usual, but I strongly suspect that the two 8.1s mean that the 9.4 is likely to be a rogue result. Also in this case 8.1 is more the result I was expecting.
Does anyone have a best-approach to this kind of thing, either based on pure maths or similar experience with their own meter?
Sometimes all three readings are the same or 0.1 mmol/l out, which is nice.
Sometimes however they are quite a broad spread, say for example 5.1, 5.5, 6.1. In this case taking an average seems like a very good idea.
However sometimes it seems more like there is a 'rogue result'. The most recent 3 readings I got were 9.4, 8.1, 8.1.
I've logged down the average as usual, but I strongly suspect that the two 8.1s mean that the 9.4 is likely to be a rogue result. Also in this case 8.1 is more the result I was expecting.
Does anyone have a best-approach to this kind of thing, either based on pure maths or similar experience with their own meter?