Sounds completely bonkers! Strikes me as trying to manipulate the criteria as a cost cutting exercise.
Yes and no. I suspect the issue here is that a
lot more long term diabetics than you'd think have hypos down to 3ish at night. Before cgms we just never knew about it. I can function at 3 , not well enough to drive or use machinery, but then if I'm lying in bed I'm not doing that. I think you have to go down to the low or mid 2s before you start having seizures (yes, I've done that). So if you have a hypo that doesn't need medical attention and maybe wakes you with a headache in the morning, is any harm done? On an NHS cost counting basis, maybe not. Certainly not while they are only willing to fund cgms for 20% of T1s.
Now I'm lucky that I have the finances to afford a cgm, and I would hate to have to cope without it, particularly if I lived alone.
Weirdly, although hard, it now appears easier to qualify for a pump on the NHS than a CGM. I take my hat off to anyone who can fine tune their pump control WITHOUT CGM input.
That is strange. I'd imagine that you'd need to do a blood test before you changed any of your pump settings so the glucometer strips would probably cost more than the cgm. Plus surely a pump costs more than a cgm?
What happens to kids on cgms and pumps when they turn 18 or 21? Does funding get removed?