phoenix
Expert
- Messages
- 5,671
- Type of diabetes
- Type 1
- Treatment type
- Pump
Ten years old, study of economic outcomes suggested that it saved money. http://www.dafne.uk.com/Cost_benefits_of_delivering_DAFNE-I367.html
One difference between DAFNE and the model it was based on was that the original course was an in patient course so far more expensive.
My courses here are all in patient but there is legislation that means people who are employed have to be given leave and salary (probably not so good for self employed.) You basically get told that the follow up courses are also compulsory, everyone turned up though there were a couple who had been on a different course so there must be some flexibility.
I remember seeing a statement of rights and responsibilities for a person with diabetes who gets 100% reimbursement from the state. From memory it seems to be based on this one from the IDF. I doubt though that they withdraw 100% care for the non compliant ( they only do that if you miss your contribution payments !)
http://www.idf.org/sites/default/files/Charter-of-Rights-EN.pdf
One difference between DAFNE and the model it was based on was that the original course was an in patient course so far more expensive.
My courses here are all in patient but there is legislation that means people who are employed have to be given leave and salary (probably not so good for self employed.) You basically get told that the follow up courses are also compulsory, everyone turned up though there were a couple who had been on a different course so there must be some flexibility.
I remember seeing a statement of rights and responsibilities for a person with diabetes who gets 100% reimbursement from the state. From memory it seems to be based on this one from the IDF. I doubt though that they withdraw 100% care for the non compliant ( they only do that if you miss your contribution payments !)
http://www.idf.org/sites/default/files/Charter-of-Rights-EN.pdf