But do you consider yourself cured and do you believe that your diabetes will EVER return?
I'm guessing your symptoms were elevated blood glucose levels?I didn't have any symptoms when I was diagnosed.
You are still on medication so that means the medicine is controlling you? You appear to be well controlled but not cured?
There are a lot of members looking for news of a cure so any false hopes should be dashed until a medical authority announces one and any hints should be squashed?
Reverse versus managed with diet versus cured is a constant theme with respect to type 2 on this forum. I wouldn't call it false hope to inform type 2 diabetics that a low carb diet can result in normal blood glucose levels.There are a lot of members looking for news of a cure so any false hopes should be dashed until a medical authority announces one and any hints should be squashed?
Yes, but it was not something I was aware of, which is the usual meaning of symptom.I'm guessing your symptoms were elevated blood glucose levels?
While many of us have managed to achieve normalized glucose level with HbA1c ~ 5.5%, few if any have been able to restore normal 1st phase insulin response sufficiently to handle high carb loads.
Dropping the carbs gives our pancreas and liver some relief. But much work is still needed to heal from the years of damages. That's why I find Valter Longo's research on stem cells regeneration thru fasting/refeeding cycles insightful and promising. Addressing some of the gaps/issues faced by long term low carbers or those on chronic calorie restricted diet.
Clearing away the damaged and regenerating healthy new cells is the holy grail...
I'm cured. No struggle was required, just eating steak instead of spuds, pasta, bread, etc.but wouldn't call it a certainty, either. Ex. My sugars went form near normal to 675 in one day as an infection raged while waiting for antibiotic delivery
Anyone on even a maintenance dose is not even in remission until no drugs are needed at all, and if they have to maintain a low carb diet, they are still eating a diet that non diabetics can ignore. So, I figure there is no cure, as yet, there is only a consistent struggle.
This is the advice from Public Health England:-I was told by my DN that my T2 was considered 'resolved' because I had two good HbA1c results in a row. I asked whether that meant that I wouldn't be called for eye exams etc. and she couldn't tell me (just that I should come back in for a blood test in 6 months).
Personally I believe my numbers are good (see signature) because I've adopted LCHF and have upped the exercise and lost weight. I'm happier with 'controlled'
I've only been diagnosed about 10 months now so it seems a bit early to be saying my T2 is 'resolved'
That sounds strange, anybody know why?even though their risk of developing diabetic retinopathy may have increased following a rapid improvement in diabetes control.
That sounds strange, anybody know why?
Generally retinopathy progresses according to the parameters below. There are very few exceptions. Once background retinopathy develops, unless diabetic control is improved as below, the retinopathy will deteriorate, laser will be needed, and even with laser sight may be affected.
- glucose level/HbA1c, linear relationship with retinopathy progression
- blood pressure, linear relationship
- lipid level, probably a near linear relationship
- smoking, probable linear relationship (some work suggests 20 cigarettes a day triples/quadruples retinopathy, others less so)
- pregnancy may cause a rapid deterioration
- sudden improvement (lowering to normal) of glucose levels in a person whose diabetes has been poorly controlled for sometime see and here .
It's probably related to retinal blood flow. High blood glucose is known to increase blood flow to the retina. Dropping the glucose to normal causes a reduction in blood flow. Depending on the amount of retinopathy that has already occurred, the retina may respond to this reduced blood flow by producing growth factors that promote growth of new vessels (proliferative retinopathy). These new vessels are fragile and bleed easily thereby obscuring the vision.That sounds strange, anybody know why?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?