Those foods are called "staples" for a reason. They have no doubt been the main part of most people's meals since childhood. I don't eat them myself but I can understand that being told to give them up is seen as too radical a step for many, especially those on a very limited budget. Giving up sweets, desserts, cakes etc is more acceptable as those things have always been considered a luxury rather than a necessity.What is the obsession with potatoes, rice, bread and pasta?!
That’s brilliant! And the sort of diabetic journey that makes me believe it’s achievable!
Hug for the horrific thought of all those, I would think mainly avoidable, amputations it’s shocking.Just come back from lunch with an old friend who had a recent hospital stay. The next ward was full of people in wheelchairs missing various lower limbs. When she asked the nurse why there were so many bad accident cases the nurse said they were all Diabetics. My friend was stunned. I expect they were badly advised and told it was progressive so carried on eating wrongly in the face of the inevitible. It is just so tragic.
Hug for shock that she wanted to give you meds to increase your blood sugars so presumably you could then need to take more insulin!This forum has helped me immensely, more than any other source of information on diabetes. It has given me the courage to follow the diet that is right for me. I'm type 1 and my endo recommends that half of what I eat should be starch. I'm not low carb - about 150 to 200 per day but no starch. She considers me on a very low dose and wonders why I don't take more. She actually wanted to give me meds to increase my blood sugar ! My hba1c was 4.5% at the end of August. I insisted "no meds absolutely". She asked me what I eat for breakfast in a suspicious way. So I started to tell her and I noticed her face was stern so at the end of my list I lied and said "and toast". She looked so relieved. Pretty pathetic if you are obliged to lie to your doctor, but she's the one who gives me my prescription for insulin so I'll keep her happy.
Hug for the horrific thought of all those, I would think mainly avoidable, amputations it’s shocking.
Thanks @Emma_369 That is just what I wanted to hear - love it.@ianpspurs theres been 3 comments on this thread with people successfully managing diabetes for over 20yrs with diet seeming to play the main part - just thought I’d tag you in it as know that’s something you were looking for on another thread
Hallelujah - that is all I needed to know in a different thread. Thanks so much @Yai25 years for me since diagnosis. Take metformin but no other medication, and since I discovered these helpful people on this forum, I have lost weight and hugely reduced HbA1c through low-carb. Anyone who tells me type 2 is progressive will be told something back!
I believe he is right in saying it's a progressive disease as I have been type two for just two years a little overweight at the start but have followed a low-carb diet from the outset and in the past 10 weeks have been unable to stabilize my sugars through no fault of my own - my Dr upped my medication every two weeks to no avail and as of last Friday am now insulin dependantAn endocrinologist from a local hospital gave a talk at a local village hall entitled "A diabetes overview". I was interested in what he might say and I'm always learning things from different sources.
I learned that 1 in 3 type II diabetics take insulin, something I hadn't realised and I'm still surprised at the number. He also added that between 10 and 20 years all type 2 diabetics will be on insulin, it is a progressive disease. As I've just passed my 21st anniversary I must be doing something right. At the end of his talk the one word he hadn't mentioned was "carbohydrate". Sugar, obesity, exercise, diet, they were all there, but not a word about carbs. I held my tongue and let others (50 people in audience) ask questions. Interestingly there were several people who were pre diabetic and all were wanting to know how not to progress to type 2, after all, he had made a point of saying that it was a progressive disease. His answer was to lose weight, not such a bad idea, except several of the questioners were quite obviously not carrying too much in the way of excess fat.
I thought now was a good time to ask what I thought was a carefully worded question, I didn't want to be a smart **** and offend him. I said "If NICE guidelines suggest that 1/3 of our calories come from carbs, which convert to glucose, and type II diabetics aren't producing enough insulin or are insulin resistant, why don't we tell type II diabetics to eat less carbs". He just said "It's a contentious issue because there hasn't been enough research". So you can see why I was disappointed, but what did I expect.
The interesting thing was that my suggestion to lower carbs, even after I explained what a difference it had made to me, didn't raise an eyelid, even those who were quite obviously aware of the progress of the disease and wanted to know how to slow things down.
Perhaps I should have used another tactic. It's very obvious that members of this forum have a more open approach to caring for themselves.
His nutritional info is flawed too the recipe below says it contains 0 carbs and 0.3g sugar per serving ( not sure that combination is even possible ) also the cornflour adds 5.5g carbs into the whole dish (so 1.4g per serving ) all on its ownJamie Oliver talks the talk, but it doesn't seem to affect his recipes.
https://www.jamieoliver.com/christmas/collection/christmas-desserts/
So I started to tell her and I noticed her face was stern so at the end of my list I lied and said "and toast". She looked so relieved.
An endocrinologist from a local hospital gave a talk at a local village hall entitled "A diabetes overview". I was interested in what he might say and I'm always learning things from different sources.
I learned that 1 in 3 type II diabetics take insulin, something I hadn't realised and I'm still surprised at the number. He also added that between 10 and 20 years all type 2 diabetics will be on insulin, it is a progressive disease. As I've just passed my 21st anniversary I must be doing something right. At the end of his talk the one word he hadn't mentioned was "carbohydrate". Sugar, obesity, exercise, diet, they were all there, but not a word about carbs. I held my tongue and let others (50 people in audience) ask questions. Interestingly there were several people who were pre diabetic and all were wanting to know how not to progress to type 2, after all, he had made a point of saying that it was a progressive disease. His answer was to lose weight, not such a bad idea, except several of the questioners were quite obviously not carrying too much in the way of excess fat.
I thought now was a good time to ask what I thought was a carefully worded question, I didn't want to be a smart **** and offend him. I said "If NICE guidelines suggest that 1/3 of our calories come from carbs, which convert to glucose, and type II diabetics aren't producing enough insulin or are insulin resistant, why don't we tell type II diabetics to eat less carbs". He just said "It's a contentious issue because there hasn't been enough research". So you can see why I was disappointed, but what did I expect.
The interesting thing was that my suggestion to lower carbs, even after I explained what a difference it had made to me, didn't raise an eyelid, even those who were quite obviously aware of the progress of the disease and wanted to know how to slow things down.
Perhaps I should have used another tactic. It's very obvious that members of this forum have a more open approach to caring for themselves.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?