Just to clarify one point.
If someone finds this site through Google, then yes they can comment on it on Facebook.
They can also comment on it on any of the many, many different discussion areas on the Internet.
People could be linking to posts on here on Mumsnet.
How would you know?
How do you feel about Mumsnet?
People could be commenting on Google+.
How would you know?
How do you feel about Google+?
There are other diabetes fora (all over the world) and people could link to posts on here.
How would you know?
How do you feel about them linking to your posts and discussing them without you knowing?
People could well be commenting on this very thread all over the Internet.
There is no requirement to become a member of this forum to comment on the posts.
There is only a requirement to join this forum to comment on posts within this forum as part of the discussion within this forum.
Facebook is a complete red herring.
This is a public forum and ANY other forum can link to this site and the content within this site, and comment on it without anyone on this site knowing about it.
Please, just because you personally hate Facebook doesn't make others posting to Facebook some kind of crime.
Cheers
LGC
@satindoll you have just put across your view , and expressed the fears that some share....I have been watching this thread and would like to thank @zand @Brunneria @Kat100 @Robinredbreast @poshtotty and the others for putting across so eloquently the fears and concerns of those of us who find it difficult to express ourselves,
I get the feeling that the key issue is that people thought the forum was a private space where they could express themselves freely without anyone outside it seeing what they had written, and the discovery that links to the forum are posted on Facebook where non members can follow the link and read items they have written has shocked and surprised a fair few. It's not so much that it's Facebook, more that the forum was never a private place and has been treated as such.
Where have I said that others posting on Facebook is " some kind of crime"?Just to clarify one point.
If someone finds this site through Google, then yes they can comment on it on Facebook.
They can also comment on it on any of the many, many different discussion areas on the Internet.
People could be linking to posts on here on Mumsnet.
How would you know?
How do you feel about Mumsnet?
People could be commenting on Google+.
How would you know?
How do you feel about Google+?
There are other diabetes fora (all over the world) and people could link to posts on here.
How would you know?
How do you feel about them linking to your posts and discussing them without you knowing?
People could well be commenting on this very thread all over the Internet.
There is no requirement to become a member of this forum to comment on the posts.
There is only a requirement to join this forum to comment on posts within this forum as part of the discussion within this forum.
Facebook is a complete red herring.
This is a public forum and ANY other forum can link to this site and the content within this site, and comment on it without anyone on this site knowing about it.
Please, just because you personally hate Facebook doesn't make others posting to Facebook some kind of crime.
Cheers
LGC
The same words keep reappearing in this thread, "unfairness" "betrayal" etc. YOU MUST ALL UNDERSTAND THAT YOU AGREED TO IT, WE ALL DID! There is no element of unfairness, there is no element of betrayal. You agreed that your comments can be reproduced on ANY website and ANY form of media at DCUK's discretion.Where have I said that others posting on Facebook is " some kind of crime"?
My posts on this subject have so far been concerned with unfairness, and I do appreciate that people ( including some members on here ) do enjoy posting on Facebook , and that the Facebook group fulfills a purpose. However, I stand by my belief that it is not necessary to link to threads on here, as it should be able to achieve what it sets out to do without needing to do that.
Signy
The same words keep reappearing in this thread, "unfairness" "betrayal" etc. YOU MUST ALL UNDERSTAND THAT YOU AGREED TO IT, WE ALL DID! There is no element of unfairness, there is no element of betrayal. You agreed that your comments can be reproduced on ANY website and ANY form of media at DCUK's discretion.
You should learn that people's feelings are not governed by facts.
We are not in a court of law. We are on a forum where people chat, discuss, exchange ideas and offer advice. This involves both facts and emotions.Oh yeah, that works well in a court of law.
The same words keep reappearing in this thread, "unfairness" "betrayal" etc. YOU MUST ALL UNDERSTAND THAT YOU AGREED TO IT, WE ALL DID! There is no element of unfairness, there is no element of betrayal. You agreed that your comments can be reproduced on ANY website and ANY form of media at DCUK's discretion.
What seems to be coming across from other posters is the decision by Administrators to repost certain threads without our knowledge, as if they are playing God.
I for one would feel much happier and have a better sense of being respected as a member, if a note was added to the bottom of the thread in the way that moderators do when they lock a thread or edit it, simply saying that this thread has been reposted to Facebook because the content is considered to be of interest.
How poor daniT1D feels about seeing his dating thread reposted and finding himself laid bare and exposed to potential mockery, I cannot imagine. As things stand at the moment it seems we are encouraged to post as members simply to provide additional material to promote DCUK on Facebook but we are offered no protection or even the courtesy of being informed. We are afterall members of this site, and normally membership means we are protected by a governing body - not exploited by them.
Oh yeah, that works well in a court of law.
Hi all - it's good to see that this has stirred a debate. Just to reiterate - the forum is not private, and that's why it is policy not to have any personally identifiable information (no-one likes those tax-scam emails!).
Our research analytics suggest that most people who come to the forum for the first time will read threads for anywhere between 4 to 12 weeks before taking the plunge and deciding to speak and share their opinions, questions and experiences. They're motivated by the way people are communicating, sharing and liking posts - it's friendly, compassionate and welcoming.
How do we help more people? By spreading the word further. We understand the concerns regarding Facebook. All that is posted is a link to the thread in question - there's no identifiable information in the links that are shared, and users are directed to the forum. This is identical to how people come through to the forum on Google, twitter, Bing or any other platform.
In regards to a Facebook opt-in/opt-out - creating something like this is actually very difficult, as was mentioned earlier in the thread. The fact still remains - the community is improving the health outcomes of other community members through open sharing and engaging; so to then make this forum private goes against all the positive benefits of using the forum. Again, as was mentioned before, this is a global community and we're accepting of all.
Could I ask what the problem is with posting on Facebook? Just as this forum is moderated, so is Facebook (yes, you may find unmoderated comments - there is no reporting system so we have to go through pretty much every comment).
If it's trust, there is no information shared that wouldn't be otherwise shared if a user has come through Google. We don't post any identifiable information, and if a username is ever identifiable Giverny is always quick to ensure users change their email address. It is still private. If anyone has any concerns about their identity on the forum, please contact @Giverny who will change your username to an alias.
Your identity is exactly as private as it was if links were not shared on Facebook. We don't link to facebook profiles, we simply link to forum threads. (This also means that Skype requests are unconnected to the forum!)
If it's that people feel betrayed, we can only apologise. This is not our intention .The forum is public and as mentioned before, we naively assumed people were aware of how internet forums work.
The fact is that all that is shared is a link, like how a link to a forum post is shared in our weekly newsletters or social roundups. It's not identifiable and all the research suggests it is positively affecting others peoples' health outcomes.
As stated before (but in more detail):
- 73% of forum members said that they had improved their understanding of diabetes because of information they had read on the diabetes forum
- 44% of members said they had improved their blood glucose control
- 35% of members said the forum had helped them to reduce their HbA1c
- 55% of members said they had improved their diet choices
- 49% of members said they had more confidence in managing their diabetes
We want to resolve this - but not sharing doesn't seem to be the answer. If that was to be implemented, does that then mean that posts shouldn't be indexable by Google? If so, thousands of members to this forum would never have found the forum - and - hence - not improved their health outcomes. And that's the key - people are getting better/healthier/happier because of what is communicated on this forum.
But this isn't a court of law urbanracer, It's a diabetic support forumMany people have showed their displeasure and some members don't mind or don't care where or how our posts are put, We are allowed to show that we are not happy with how this is done.
Good morning @admim
I highlighted a paragraph which seemed to jump out at me.
1) because of Heathenlasses above post
2) also the wording there is no reporting system so we have to go through pretty much every comment). which is stated above. I would of thought the length of time, energy and money that is needed in this task ( which would appear not to be 100% achievable) I think would obviously be better spent else where regarding the site? To me. I feel, it's complete waste of resources. As said before, an advert on Facebook would be more than adequate for people to be pointed here, via Facebook.
This would be far better, as this thread has caused quite a stir and some members are clearly unhappy and pointed out why.
I also asked before ( on another post), for your email address that was mentioned on the bottom of your first post on this subject ?
Could it be posted on here for members to pass on their comments ? Thank you
Best wishes RRB
RRB - In your post, you haven't properly tagged Admin. You might want to have a look at that; especially as you are expecting a reaction.
I would make 2 comments:
Firstly, I think to expect any moderation to be 100% right isn't fair. Moderation, by its nature, involved subjective judgements relating to acceptable standards. Even when standards are define (and I have no idea if this site has such definitions in the SOPs), there will be grey areas and differing interpretations where you have human beings making those judgements. To be fair, citing the post Heathenlass did, it would be difficult to see how that could be assessed as anything other than unacceptable. But, in the real world, all it takes is for the checker to be interrupted, then resume their task in a slightly different part of the page than they left it. That's human error.
Secondly, I'm not sure what Facebook's T&Cs stand, in relation to advertising other sites. I know BT, and the like, have a presence there, but thikning about how they promote themselves, they will always link to something that's happening - an offer or a new product. It's probably doable, but maybe needs quite a bit of due diligence on Admin's part beforehand.
RRB when i said i don't care (if you meant my comment) it wasn't that i think this is right, i actually think its quite shocking and understand why it is so upsetting to some people, i meant personally i don't mind (care) who sees anything i write because everyone in the real world knows I'm off my nut anyway, i support everyone getting upset by it. i don't see it as a problem to sort out even, no need to moderate Facebook, or change the rules, just stop doing it seems the answer to me
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?