Mud Island Dweller
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,161
- Location
- Mud island
- Type of diabetes
- Treatment type
- Tablets (oral)
- Dislikes
- An awful lot.
I totally agree with what you're saying but the thread was specifically about people on benefits and there is a huge amount of fraudulent claims. Even at your estimated Gov't figure of 1% ( I'd say this is very conservative BTW ), the benefit spend is approx £160billion, so 1% still a pretty penny. However, I don't trust the majority of stats the Gov't provide to be honest. Totally agree though, MP's and big business are corrupt too, but that's a different thread maybe !Why do we ignore the most blatant transfer of money from the poor to the rich?
http://www.monbiot.com/2013/07/01/robber-barons/
Some of them are millionaires from elsewhere: sheikhs, oligarchs and mining magnates who own vast estates in this country. Though they might pay no taxes in the UK, they receive millions in farm subsidies. They are the world’s most successful benefit tourists. Yet, amid the manufactured terror of immigrants living off British welfare payments, we scarcely hear a word raised against them.
The minister responsible for cutting income support for the poor, Iain Duncan Smith, lives on an estate owned by his wife’s family. Over the past ten years, it has received €1.5m in income support from taxpayers(9). How much more obvious do these double standards have to be before we begin to notice?
It seems to be that this forum has become just a little bit political, and as usual the Gov take the beating for failing to provide for the individuals who feel society owes them something because they cannot cope for themselves. I know there may be very deserving cases of people who cannot actually take care of themselves, but fortunately they are in the real minority and they are the ones that deserve all the help society can provide them, but that does not include, and I am sorry if you feel you may be classified among them, those who can get about and manage a life, albeit a temporary restricted one. As someone who has not claimed a benefit, and no I am not one of the socialist millionaires like Blair and Brown etc and co who have made a very good living out of paying the rest us of more than the country could afford, and yes that goes right back to the 70's and the Wilson Government who decided that if a couple decided to have children then yes the state should provide for them as well via universal child benefit. The Welfare state was about providing a minimum standard of living noit an easy life which we have now been led to believe is our right. Well wake up and smell the coffee, nothing is free in life and i don't feel inclined to pay a single penny more than I have to to provide an easy life for someone who refuses to take responsibility for their own decisions and expects the rest of the taxpayers to support their lifestyle.
Finally after this rant, I have to say that all politicians are tainted by self seeking ambitions, not neccessarily monetary but also self importance and most of their pronouncemnts should be taken with a sack of salt, but it comes down to a philsophy either borrow on credit and provide non contributing jobs, like the civil service or manage within your means and only spend what you can afford, something previous generations seemed to manage, unlike the present one which demands to have everything now.
I much preferred it when the forum stuck to helping others and was not used for a personal political platform
It seems to be that this forum has become just a little bit political, and as usual the Gov take the beating for failing to provide for the individuals who feel society owes them something because they cannot cope for themselves. I know there may be very deserving cases of people who cannot actually take care of themselves, but fortunately they are in the real minority and they are the ones that deserve all the help society can provide them, but that does not include, and I am sorry if you feel you may be classified among them, those who can get about and manage a life, albeit a temporary restricted one. As someone who has not claimed a benefit, and no I am not one of the socialist millionaires like Blair and Brown etc and co who have made a very good living out of paying the rest us of more than the country could afford, and yes that goes right back to the 70's and the Wilson Government who decided that if a couple decided to have children then yes the state should provide for them as well via universal child benefit. The Welfare state was about providing a minimum standard of living noit an easy life which we have now been led to believe is our right. Well wake up and smell the coffee, nothing is free in life and i don't feel inclined to pay a single penny more than I have to to provide an easy life for someone who refuses to take responsibility for their own decisions and expects the rest of the taxpayers to sipport their lifestyle.
Finally after this rant, I have to say that all politicians are tainted by self seeking ambitions, not neccessarily monetary but also self importance and most of their pronouncemnts should be taken with a sack of salt, but it comes down to a philsophy either borrow on credit and provide non contributing jobs, like the civil service or manage within your means and only spend what you can afford, something previous generations seemed to manage, unlike the present one which demands to have everything now.
I much preferred it when the forum stuck to helping others and was not used for a personal political platform
Apologies, I claimed I was not in receipt of any benefit, but as I receive free prescriptions for my diabetes, I guess I do.
Not sure how ?Feel for you all the way Captain Pixie. I have commented before on the cuts to benefits that are currently happening all over the place. We have turned into a society where there is no support, help or consideration for people who truly need and deserve it. The stories of those people who are quite clearly very ill and are made to work, parents who are asked to pay bedroom tax as soon as their child dies makes my bold boil too. We need things and attitudes to change fast but I'm not sure how.
Not sure how ?
If everybody who is on a benefit actually voted at the next General Election the current government would not be re-elected and therefore not be running this country. The difficulty is getting people to actually vote. Why not use your vote in a powerful manner. If you have difficulty getting to a polling station it is possible to register for a postal vote, which is delivered to you in the mail and goes back via the mail. A vote is a very powerful much under-used tool that we can use to better benefit ourselves.
Sent from the Diabetes Forum App
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?