Thanks for the replies. I've been reading around online and one site had a Q and A with a dietician who claimed that the current treatment for hypoglycemia was less than 130g of carbs a day (what the keto diet calls moderate carb), across 6, smaller, meals a day; as opposed to no carbs at all.
I have no idea if this is accurate or true, but it seems to me, until i can speak to a professional, that at best the thing to do would be a gradual approach, not to dive right in to as few carbs as possible.
I agree. I was responding to the OP questions about what to eat if not a cheese sandwich or other high carb foods.Gosh, 4 pages of discussion on low carb diets when OP has no idea whether their problem/symptoms are actually anything to do with blood sugar. It seems a bit hasty. Surely first step, before changing diet, would have to be investigations to come to a diagnosis, so testing blood sugar when the symptoms are experienced, another review with the GP to discuss any food intolerances/allergies and tests to exclude those?
Neither the OP, nor anyone else commenting on this thread, have any idea of whether he is experiencing hypoglycaemia.
Yeah, that's true!
I have begun posts with an if, but am at fault for surmising his predicament.
I have tried to give my experience, but he does needs diagnosis.
He needs medical advice, but as before wether he gets someone that has treated hypoglycaemia (if he does indeed have it) is not in my experience.
But, a low carb diet won't do him much harm in the long run!
I want to try this and I appreciate the advice, but it's a bit overwhelming. Curries are nice, but i've no idea how tocook one, and what would you replace the rice with?
Again, no one can say that, without knowing what is wrong with him.
I would say short term it can cause no harm, then the op can decide if it has helped, or made him worse, then than take the information to his doctor, and have more information to be correctly diagnosed.
By the sounds of it, it's not really going to make any differnce. There seems to be the notion that doctors don't really understand this, and that they prescribe ineffectual solutions (such as 6 meals a day). I can't imagine any medical professional, if questioned about this, will see things differently, assuming they are wrong.Gosh, 4 pages of discussion on low carb diets when OP has no idea whether their problem/symptoms are actually anything to do with blood sugar. It seems a bit hasty. Surely first step, before changing diet, would have to be investigations to come to a diagnosis, so testing blood sugar when the symptoms are experienced, another review with the GP to discuss any food intolerances/allergies and tests to exclude those?
Neither the OP, nor anyone else commenting on this thread, have any idea of whether he is experiencing hypoglycaemia.
The problem is fine if his doctor can give a diagnosis or refer him to an endocrinologist who knows how to gain a diagnosis. In my long experience that can be rather hit or miss!
Not many GPs or even endos have experience of Hypoglycaemia. And there are many forms of Hypoglycaemia. Tests are used to eliminate other conditions rather than defining them.
In my experience, the nutritional information from our dietary advisors is flawed and I'm almost certain that as he has looked around, that the consensus on diet is to eat carbs, which by our 'reaction' is causing the condition and all the horrific symptoms.
You, as T2 diabetic, do not need the extreme low version of the low carb diet!
I do, and after four years of low carbing, I'm as healthy as I can possibly be, for a man of my age!
I don't and wouldn't post anything that would likely make the op worse.
He needs a new way of thinking if he has any form of Hypoglycaemia.
By the sounds of it, it's not really going to make any differnce. There seems to be the notion that doctors don't really understand this, and that they prescribe ineffectual solutions (such as 6 meals a day). I can't imagine any medical professional, if questioned about this, will see things differently, assuming they are wrong.
By the sounds of it, it's not really going to make any differnce. There seems to be the notion that doctors don't really understand this, and that they prescribe ineffectual solutions (such as 6 meals a day). I can't imagine any medical professional, if questioned about this, will see things differently, assuming they are wrong.
What else could it be? What similar conditions exist?And maybe a new way of thinking if it's not any form of Hypoglycaemia at all?
You're just gambling that an ultra low carb will be suitable for any illness, diagnosed or not.
The others on here are saying maybe it's so easy to be certain over the internet, with no diagnosis and just a brief sketch of the symptoms?
What else could it be? What similar conditions exist?
I doubt there is much more we can do to help you. I strongly suggest you keep a diary of when these symptoms appear, in what circumstances, when and what you last ate. Then make an appointment with your doctor and show them to him. Beg and plead for a meter with strips on prescription so you can check your levels when you feel so rough.
How long is it normal to get hungry again really quickly after a non/low carb meal?
Of course, but my question was: what other conditions could it be?None of us know anything about you, what your results where, what your symptoms are, what foods you are allergic to, or anything about your health or history.
You've been diagnosed over this thread by the the internet equivalent of the bloke down the pub for medical qualifications as well.
None of us are doctors.
We don't know! We are not doctors, please ask your GP.Of course, but my question was: what other conditions could it be?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?