seadragon
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 316
- Type of diabetes
- Prediabetes
- Treatment type
- Diet only
Part of my problem with the whole cholesterol thing is that the basic fact underlying much of what is said, seems to be wrong for a great many people (I won't say all as there are always exceptions). i.e that cholesterol levels are raised by eating fat, especially saturated fat. My cholesterol does not go up with eating saturated fat. My lipid profile improved greatly the more saturated fat (of the healthy kind - not trans fats) I add to my diet. What makes it worse is eating more carbs. When they can't get that right but simply equate eating fat with both getting fat and high cholesterol it implies to me that much of the rest of the science is dubious.
Healthy cholesterol levels used to be thought to be around 5-7mmol and it seems to be those with links to statin manufacturers who are pushing for lower and lower guidelines. My big red flag is when they start suggesting treatments (statins) for perfectly healthy people. Treatments with well known side effects. What happened to the 'First do no harm' of medicine? Some people may not get them but for others they are life changing and destroy a quality of life that was there before. Since the beneficial effects are not proven in an irrefutable way (there is still much argument over benefits) then I would not mess with my body's chemistry when the people wanting to do the messing don't fully understand the process they are affecting and are getting monetary gain from it.
At least a book has no side effects and changing my diet has had nothing but positive effects. Even if my insulin resistance/glucose intolerance was cured overnight I would not go back to eating the standard NHS 'Eatwell' diet with it's emphasis on high carb and low fat. For me that is not a healthy diet while low carb, high good fats is healthy and I feel so much better than before I was diagnosed. The range of high and low can be individual.
It is time the NHS woke up to the fact that people are getting themselves well in different ways and start giving us the options instead of sticking to their one size fits all approach which demonstrably does not work.
Healthy cholesterol levels used to be thought to be around 5-7mmol and it seems to be those with links to statin manufacturers who are pushing for lower and lower guidelines. My big red flag is when they start suggesting treatments (statins) for perfectly healthy people. Treatments with well known side effects. What happened to the 'First do no harm' of medicine? Some people may not get them but for others they are life changing and destroy a quality of life that was there before. Since the beneficial effects are not proven in an irrefutable way (there is still much argument over benefits) then I would not mess with my body's chemistry when the people wanting to do the messing don't fully understand the process they are affecting and are getting monetary gain from it.
At least a book has no side effects and changing my diet has had nothing but positive effects. Even if my insulin resistance/glucose intolerance was cured overnight I would not go back to eating the standard NHS 'Eatwell' diet with it's emphasis on high carb and low fat. For me that is not a healthy diet while low carb, high good fats is healthy and I feel so much better than before I was diagnosed. The range of high and low can be individual.
It is time the NHS woke up to the fact that people are getting themselves well in different ways and start giving us the options instead of sticking to their one size fits all approach which demonstrably does not work.