Exactly! It is not all about CICO! Give the man a coconut.Because it shows the importance of weight management on health parameters in general.
Head, brick wall.Exactly! It is not all about CICO! Give the man a coconut.
nope, if you are quoting studies, you give the links, correct links. Its not my job to use my time to search for stuff.I am in general against anecdotes yes, you all here seem to live by "personal experience" though.
As I said. He ate 80% of his calories daily from ice cream. It's all there if you go look for it with a website dedicated to it.
Lol well personal experience is the only thing that matters. If something doesn't work for you personally it doesn't matter if todays science says it should.I am in general against anecdotes yes, you all here seem to live by "personal experience" though.
As I said. He ate 80% of his calories daily from ice cream. It's all there if you go look for it with a website dedicated to it.
Completely ignoring hormonal imbalance, how can you disiss something so complex as the human metabolic system?Head, brick wall.
CICO is what causes weight gain or loss.
Yes I did. Please don’t make assumptions about me. And I went to the website he quotes, which doesn’t work btw as it’s expired.The full results are discussed in the video linked. You clearly didn't watch it.
Not really.Lol well personal experience is the only thing that matters. If something doesn't work for you personally it doesn't matter if todays science says it should.
You might find that you put a little more effort into sticking to a ketogenic diet if you had been diagnosed with a life altering condition such as... er... Type 2 Diabetes.Not really.
Science informs practice. If it doesn't work for individual it's down to individual application and adherence.
For example keto diets work well for many. For me personally I couldn't stick to one. Does that mean they don't work? No, just means for me it wasn't the right choice.
So it’s not possible that the science is only applicable in certain conditions, ie those that it was developed withinScience informs practice. If it doesn't work for individual it's down to individual application and adherence.
I will ask this again, for the third time: who do you recommend low carb diets for, under what circumstances, and why do you choose to recommend them for those people?
I'm not ruling out individual differences to dietary responses, I prescribe low carb diets sometimess myself.
For me personally I couldn't stick to one.
I'm not ruling out individual differences to dietary responses, I prescribe low carb diets sometimess myself. But if individual differences are in important why does everyone here rule out any other diet than LC or LCHF for diabetes management? When I've shown they can be successfully treated with a large percentage of carbohydrate in your diet in clinical settings?
This being the case it demonstrates that something more fundamental than hormones is responsible for improvements in the majority of cases.
I'm a fully qualified nutritionist
nope, if you are quoting studies, you give the links, correct links. Its not my job to use my time to search for stuff.
After eating 2,000 calories-worth of ice cream every day, for 100 days, Anthony’s blood lipids all improved, his HDL cholesterol (the good one) was higher, the LDL cholesterol was lower, and he had dramatically lowered the level of his triglycerides. Most surprisingly, despite all the sugar he put in his body, his glucose level slightly declined too.
“The message here is not that this is an ideal diet to permanently sustain, the message is specifically to show how an energy deficit overrides specific food sources when it comes to weight/fat loss,” Anthony said, adding that despite feeling miserable through more than half the ice-cream diet, this was definitely not his last stunt diet. So expect to see even more crazy experiments from him.
Lol well personal experience is the only thing that matters. If something doesn't work for you personally it doesn't matter if todays science says it should.
Just a note about ketones being a "back up fuel"
Sorry folks, to go over this again but...
The human foetus is in a state of ketosis and the neonates remain so if fed only human breast milk. If ketosis was a back up fuel then why on earth would the body rely on it? Why would our species evolve by putting our offspring at such a disadvantage?
So, there are carbs in breast milk but these are oligosaccharides and quite different from the carbs in your Warburtons sliced white.
Foetal and neonatal developement is intrinsically linked to fuel and the type of fuel used.
"Thus during maternal starvation ketone bodies may maximize chances for survival both in utero and during neonatal life by restraining cell replication and sustaining protein and lipid stores in fetal tissues"
I am still wondering why someone would prescribe a diet lower in carbs to some clients when he or she isn't totally on board with the efficacy.
I’m still really interested in your answers to @lucylocket61 and how you can be arguing low carb doesn’t work (because you claim it’s actually low calorie not low carb that works and matters) and still prescribe it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?