Personally I wouldn't describe the 8 week diet as "low carb" just very low calorie.. as such I'm not persuaded of its sustainability.I have been following the '8week Blood Sugar' diet by Dr. Michael Moseley, which gives a good low carb diet and the recipes to go with it. He also explains the science and tests that were done by himself and Prof Rod Taylor. I was so appaled by the NHS advice when I saw it online I wrote to my MP to complain and ask him to take it to the Health Minister, which he has done. I think it is scandalous that the advice they are giving is at worst killing people, at best losing limbs. I suggest anyone who has been on a lowcarb diet also write to their MP.
you know clowns can be female too, right? ; )))))
my diabetic dietician and nurse recommended a low carb diet no more than 130 g per day. its working blood sugars down and so is my weightHaving only recently diagnosed with T2 I've been doing a low carb diet. Currently about 80 g per day. It seems to be working well and BG seems to be falling.
However, when I look at what the NHS recommends a T2 should eat, it seems almost opposite of what I'm currently eating for my low carbs diet.
So is there anyone on this forum that follows the NHS recommended diet and still controls their blood sugar?
It's not easy to totally go against my Doctor's advice on what I should eat.
Japes, good for you for your regime, and isn't it sad that the medical profession seem to be so brainwashed and tunnel visioned regarding our consumption of carbs. I think its so sad that we have to end up almost deceiving our medical "support" providers - isn't life hard enough without adding deception to the skills we diabetics have to learn! Thank goodness we can support each other on this forum, because it feels like the medical profession are determine to squash the LC movement!!!I had a very depressing conversation with a student nurse recently who was earnestly encouraging me to follow the NHS advice (after a 2 day training course) "As you NEED some carbs" and "There's no need to completely give up foods you like.". This was after seeing me refuse cake, biscuits, and chocolate. Also after telling me her mum was Type 2, with complications, and she herself was expecting to follow in her mum's footsteps in about 15 years time given her blood pressure, weight and BMI all of which, along with hereditary factors, put her as high risk.
I pointed out I preferred to keep my limbs and eyesight, if at all possible, and frankly, after years of eating a "healthy diet" of the current kind of recommendations, cutting carbs to an absolute minimum was working for me and I seemed to have lost my taste for sweet things along the way... She was still having none of it, so I terminated the conversation and will be making sure I do my lunch time checks out of her sight from now on.
My wife (T2) tries to keep carbs down to around 30g per meal, weight has come down, BG in normal range. All advice given from diabetic nurse was eat high starchy carbs (which send your BG through the roof and keeps it there!) come back and we'll start you on medication, now go away and read this leaflet. There are more people in control by ignoring the advice as per NHS guidelines. "Take a pill" keep the Pharmaceutical companies in business and save the doctors/nurses having to think (keeps the numbers up on patients for allocation of funds so the books balance!).Having only recently diagnosed with T2 I've been doing a low carb diet. Currently about 80 g per day. It seems to be working well and BG seems to be falling.
However, when I look at what the NHS recommends a T2 should eat, it seems almost opposite of what I'm currently eating for my low carbs diet.
So is there anyone on this forum that follows the NHS recommended diet and still controls their blood sugar?
It's not easy to totally go against my Doctor's advice on what I should eat.
Having only recently diagnosed with T2 I've been doing a low carb diet. Currently about 80 g per day. It seems to be working well and BG seems to be falling.
However, when I look at what the NHS recommends a T2 should eat, it seems almost opposite of what I'm currently eating for my low carbs diet.
So is there anyone on this forum that follows the NHS recommended diet and still controls their blood sugar?
It's not easy to totally go against my Doctor's advice on what I should eat.
As an 8 week diet there is no claim to sustainability @bulkbiker , By being Low Cal it becomes low carb by default, though not low carb by your definitionPersonally I wouldn't describe the 8 week diet as "low carb" just very low calorie.. as such I'm not persuaded of its sustainability.
Personally I wouldn't describe the 8 week diet as "low carb" just very low calorie.. as such I'm not persuaded of its sustainability.
Exactly, so you do it for 8 weeks loose some weight then stop and the weight comes back.. as probably does the Type 2 thus it is not sustainable as a lifestyle. I personally find that LCHF is easily sustainable and so can help control my condition so much better. Thus it has become my new way of life and not my "diet". Even my fat phobic sister asked me for my cauliflower cheese sauce recipe last night as she and her partner liked it so much (cream cheese, double cream and sharp cheddar melted together with maybe some mozzarella).As an 8 week diet there is no claim to sustainability @bulkbiker , By being Low Cal it becomes low carb by default, though not low carb by your definition
Well when the diet came out I read through quite a lot of the recipes and decided that their carb content was not in line with my way of eating. If @Trebor2516 is following the diet then I would assume that he is eating some of these.. and it was a general remark about the diet not his specific meals. As a yoyo dieter of more than 30 years I think I can say that for me (and that is the position I always speak from) low calorie diets don't work .. if you don't like my opinion then fine...I don't know how you can say that with such confidence when you don't know what @Trebor2516 eats. Admittedly, some of the meals suggested on the plan are a bit rich in carbs for me, but they are not compulsory. Personally, I credit people with a bit of common sense and free will to make the best choices within the 800 calorie framework.
4L of water is excessive. In general it should be 1.9L INCLUDING water from food other fluid and water made by internal metabolism. Drink too much and it flushes out some water soluble nutrients. However, it is much complicated than that see http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-l...althy-eating/in-depth/water/art-20044256?pg=2The official NHS macros are:
Energy: 8,400 kJ/2,000kcal
Total fat: 70g
Saturates: 20g
Carbohydrate: 260g
Total sugars: 90g
Protein: 50g
http://www.nhs.uk/Livewell/Goodfood/Pages/reference-intakes-RI-guideline-daily-amounts-GDA.aspx
So I would say that you're not following the NHS dietary guidelines, which is no doubt why you're doing so well. Good work!
The NHS' math doesn't seem to add up. Assuming 4 kcal per gram for protein and carb and 9 kcal per g of fat, I get only 1,870 kcal, not 2,000 kcal. That's assuming that the sugar is part of the carbs. If the sugar is in addition to the carbs, I get 2,230 kcal. I wonder how many people reading that would think the sugar is in addition to the carbs?
4 L of water a day seems excessive, though.
This is for the general population - it makes no special consideration of people already with diabetes. There is a fairly extensive meta study of evidence relating to whether carb intakes of various kinds heightens the risk of type 2 diabetes developing - with the conclusion that there was only some evidence related to higher intake of sugars-sweetened beverages.SACN is {...} recommending that the dietary reference value for carbohydrates be maintained at a population average of approximately 50% of total dietary energy intake and that the dietary reference value for dietary fibre for adults should be increased to 30g/day. Furthermore, SACN is recommending that population average intake of free sugars should not exceed 5% of total dietary energy.
There's not much evidence that a 50% carb diet low in saturated fats is optimal or suitable for anyone.The "official" UK view on 'Carbohydrates and Health' from the Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition last year is here.
In particular:
This is for the general population - it makes no special consideration of people already with diabetes. There is a fairly extensive meta study of evidence relating to whether carb intakes of various kinds heightens the risk of type 2 diabetes developing - with the conclusion that there was only some evidence related to higher intake of sugars-sweetened beverages.
Extrapolating this diet as optimal or even suitable for people with diabetes is not supported by evidence or scope within it but it seems to be misused in that way.
SACN are currently looking at saturated fats and vitamin D.
Japes, good for you for your regime, and isn't it sad that the medical profession seem to be so brainwashed and tunnel visioned regarding our consumption of carbs. I think its so sad that we have to end up almost deceiving our medical "support" providers - isn't life hard enough without adding deception to the skills we diabetics have to learn! Thank goodness we can support each other on this forum, because it feels like the medical profession are determine to squash the LC movement!!!
But what did he do on MDI? Surely he bolused then? If he can't or won't bolus correctly, and is 'misusing' his insulin, then LC is a dangerous suggestion which could,lead to severe hypoglycaemia or worse...
Rather than get him back on your wagon (LC for a Type 2) I strongly advise you try to gently persuade him to seek out help from a Pump Nurse, even if that means travelling a little further for his appointments or simply speaking to one on the phone, which would be less hassle. He would then, hopefully, be on the appropriate 'wagon' for a Type 1 who is using an insulin pump.
You don't estimate your food and adjust your basal. I find it hard to,believe he's doing that. However stubborn he is, if he's been a Type 1 that long he'd know how to bolus. And if he's correcting highs then why isn't he simply using the bolus system for his food?
As I and others have said - it makes no sense at all, and is very hard to understand and believe.
I know you don't use a pump,and aren't Type 1, but to me it sounds like the equivalent of taking Metformin by balancing it on your head, with the number of tablets corresponding to the number of degrees centigrade the temperature is that day.
I can't really think of any other adequate comparison. It simply doesn't make sense.
Actually.. (With respect.) reading @Oldvatr 's account on his T1 friend.. I can get where it's coming from.. @Oldvatr 's mate just can't adapt.
I've been in a band also with a pumper that was a T1 for as long as I have been.. He didn't have a clue. (Set in his ways.) being given a pump don't mean one has perfected the "dark art"... After giving the guy many chances. (& the "science" with detailed excuses for him with the other band members.) I had to let the bass player go after an "insight" on the making of excuses/covering for him for 3 years.. The guy was all over the place blood wise.
I was always led to believe one had to be "a good diabetic" to get a pump. (We're talking kidney transplant in my ex bassist.) But this guy was still a liability as a D & as a "professional" musician.... I'm a patient guy. But I gave up on him in the end....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?