It was about nine hours 9pm to 6am. My stomach still felt a bit “heavy” in the morning. There are three key variables versus other days - protein, saturated fat, and lower carbs. I was thinking gluconeogenesis from the (excess) protein or temporary increase in insulin resistance from the saturated fat. I have also noticed (strangely) that after days I eat 60 to 80 carbs my next morning blood sugar seems to be a bit higher than when I eat over 100 but less than about 150. Usually not a big difference but there seems to be a trend.
If gng is demand driven what happens with consumption of “excess” protein? What then is the pathway for excess protein that is consumed to be utilized? (and stored as fat?)
If you are noticing something, then I think you should keep testing this. If it turns out to be true, then something is going on that makes you need to back off one or all of those 3 variables (protein, sat fat or low carb). I know it seems counterintuitive - so many people do swimmingly well on straight-up low carb and/or IF, but we are all really unique in our metabolisms. Diabetes and glucose regulation problems can begin in the pancreas, the muscles, the liver, the fat, the brain. Who knows what your particular issue is and perhaps that is why you are seeing different results. Perhaps your liver is some sort of a master of using amino acids to make glucose; or perhaps the "stress" of lower carbs is particularly stimulating to your particular liver; or perhaps sat fat DOES make your particular liver a little more insulin resistant. It might not do that with other people, but trust your data. Just make sure you have enough data before you change course..... Good job for being brave and looking outside the box. Keep experimenting and learning more about your "n of 1".