Whilst the news of this closed loop tech becoming more accessible is fantastic, it is still not a cure and cannot be campaigned as an artificial pancreas solution. as someone who uses it already and has done for the past almost 3 years, I still have to cope with highs/lows and when things go wrong they can very quickly go wrong. I still have to do alot of work to keep myself in range, I am lucky if I get 70% TIR per week, in fact I am more so between 60-65% each week which is below NICE guidelines.
If you are already achieving a good TIR on injections or pump therapy then you're doing brilliant, but please don't view this as a magic solution to perfect control.
Yep, to elaborate my agreement.
My colleague came up to me & mentioned an issue with the CLS his kid had.
Basically the sensor read low & suspended basal. (From the description.) The meter suggested a correction dose.. (or keep the basal going?) Their team seemed clueless..
I’m not a pumper, but I assume there is an “overide?” They were told not to touch the handset..
Not my place to help out on “that one..”
I can’t see staff training moving that quick?
My experience is DSNs (on average.) still don’t know how I work with the white disc attached to my arm.
They clamour for the data on my meter, but it’s only used to check calibration on a daily basis & to confirm hypos & corrections..
I can see it creating more issues than it’s theoretically meant to resolve for the newly DXd initiated?