NéjiSaïdi
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 71
- Location
- Tozeur, Tunisia
- Type of diabetes
- Treatment type
- Diet only
- Dislikes
- Fake knowledge
Your case proves the rule: treat with food. And that's exactly what you've being doing. Stick to the low carb diet and you'll be pleasantly surprised at how your body is healing. I did the same my self: reduced carbs to a minimum, actually doing all I can to make my diet really LCHF (Low Carb High Fat). My body responded very favorable. I have never taken any medication to manage my T2D. In fact the only medicine I am taking is for intra-ocular hypertension. I invite you to have a look at my labs (my blog) and see for yourself. All I can say is take matters into your own hands, you are your own GP. Your NHS GP will, one day, see the truth in what you are doing; low carb is still a novelty for many GPs and patients alike. Good luck.I got diagnosed as pre diabetic around 4 weeks ago. I’ve really overhauled by life since then and am on a low carb diet, trying to transition into keto. I’ve lost weight and I’m feeling good.
But today I got my call from the Diabetes Prevention people my GP put me on to and it threw me for a real loop. They want me to eat more carbs, they’re weirdly patronising (“we’re going to teach you how to read a nutrition label” “choose an apple instead of crisps”) and I feel like they weren’t listening when I said I felt good about my current diet.
But since it was referred to me by my GP I feel like I should give it a chance? What does everyone else think?
I got diagnosed as pre diabetic around 4 weeks ago. I’ve really overhauled by life since then and am on a low carb diet, trying to transition into keto. I’ve lost weight and I’m feeling good.
But today I got my call from the Diabetes Prevention people my GP put me on to and it threw me for a real loop. They want me to eat more carbs, they’re weirdly patronising (“we’re going to teach you how to read a nutrition label” “choose an apple instead of crisps”) and I feel like they weren’t listening when I said I felt good about my current diet.
But since it was referred to me by my GP I feel like I should give it a chance? What does everyone else think?
Agree with all that 's been said and please go back when you've lost more weight and brought your blood sugars down so that you can tell him why this has worked well for you. You have hit the nail on the head to say that losing fat is about managing hunger and having ridden that rodeo you know what works for you and its not calories/points/syns/portion sizes! Go for it and come back here for support.Thank you everyone for your replies. I feel a little vindicated.
I don't understand why they're so focused on carbs being a good thing. I was trying to tell her that I've been a yo-yo dieter in the past and although I lost weight on an old form of WW, I felt hungry ALL THE TIME. It was a real struggle to stay within my allowance so obviously as soon as I hit goal I just stopped and the weight came straight back on again.
I really feel like low carb is so much simpler. I still have energy and although I'm aware the Keto flu might be coming as I try to transition, I'm also aware it's short term. I have a significant amount of weight to lose and I just don't want to be hungry and tired for months and months when it seems like there's a way to lose weight and not feel that way.
I agree but the risk of “any improvement being better than none“ advice is that people go on to think this is the best advice rather than absolute minimum.Of course what type 2 diabetics need is less carbs not more but I should point out, from the evidence of my fellow students on a DESMOND course, for some people the Eatwell guide does represent less carbs. I was amazed at the ignorance of some people on the course, never having looked at a nutrition label, having no idea what carbs were, indeed having no concept of weights in grams. Reading this forum it is easy to forget that not everyone is the type who research things they don't understand. So while the DESMOND and other courses could be very much better on nutrition, that is not all they are about so I wouldn't dismiss them out of hand.
Yes, but there does seem to be the underlying assumption by the ‘educators’ that everyone being sent on these courses has been gorging on highly processed ‘junk foods’. Also that there are ‘healthy carbs’ which need to be consumed as the main component. When this doesn’t work, it is deemed to be because the poor, uneducated, patient has not been motivated enough to follow advice.Of course what type 2 diabetics need is less carbs not more but I should point out, from the evidence of my fellow students on a DESMOND course, for some people the Eatwell guide does represent less carbs. I was amazed at the ignorance of some people on the course, never having looked at a nutrition label, having no idea what carbs were, indeed having no concept of weights in grams. Reading this forum it is easy to forget that not everyone is the type who research things they don't understand. So while the DESMOND and other courses could be very much better on nutrition, that is not all they are about so I wouldn't dismiss them out of hand.
Which is exactly what’s happened with low fat high carb ironically, maybe we should sue for becoming type 2 under their advice?What they don't want is to find out in 20 years time that low carb high fat was a harmful option for some people, and that those people are suing for compensation, because insufficient research was done before advocating the diet.
My DN 100% supports my 20g carbs maximum per day. She emailed me a report on our last consultation last month. At the end of the report there were diet recommendations for a high wholemeal carbs low fat diet.The nurse at my GP's practice seemed very happy that I'd chosen this route, in spite of having given me the same old 'balanced diet, switch your white bread to wholemeal' advice that she's no doubt professionally required to churn out.
People say you need carbs, and that’s true, but carbs are in almost everything we eat so even a low carb way of eating has more than enough carbs for us.
Even if the tests don't quite match up yet, you have done good girl. That weight loss is splendid and you should be proud. Whoop whoopBtw, I am due for a blood test to check my A1c levels this month. I'm nervous about it but I've lost almost 33kg being low carb then Keto so I am unlikely to change - at least until my BMI hits the normal range. I only weigh myself once a month so I don't know for sure but I believe I should have just ticked down from the Obese bracket to the Overweight bracket.
Hoping my sugars reflect this.
Last year I was in Hospital awaiting a procedure, and I waited 6 months for it to happen. I was at the time LCHF, so going onto hospital fare was not easy. My bgl shot up into the 20's and 30's so I modified the meal plan and succeeded in getting it down. While I was doing this my bgl would often go above 15. Now the consultant was happy while I kept it to 13 or below, but 15 was not considered a bad result. I too was being coerced to eat more carbs and to have a proper breakfast of Cherrios or porridge etc.Fascinating. Actually now that you mention it, when I first spoke to the diabetic nurse all those weeks ago she SEEMED like she was talking about bringing down my carb intake (that's actually how I found this site). But I only had 30m with her that one day. Since then, the Prevention people are all about carbs carbs carbs.
Some would say the surgery could be sued for advising High Carb/Eatwell as there are many other experts who use real science and not food industry funded research such as PHE. I look forward to the day someone does go legal on the bad advice. BTW my lovely DN did suggest I cut the carbs when my HBA1C went up a bit so there are some who seek the truth.Last year I was in Hospital awaiting a procedure, and I waited 6 months for it to happen. I was at the time LCHF, so going onto hospital fare was not easy. My bgl shot up into the 20's and 30's so I modified the meal plan and succeeded in getting it down. While I was doing this my bgl would often go above 15. Now the consultant was happy while I kept it to 13 or below, but 15 was not considered a bad result. I too was being coerced to eat more carbs and to have a proper breakfast of Cherrios or porridge etc.
I queried why 13, and it seems to be that most of the patient he sees are on insulin treatment so for them a 13 was a good number. I was one of the first he had seen that got below 5 in the mornings, and it frightened him. That is a hypo on his watch.
To cut this short, I was taken off my diabetic meds while on the ward, and suddenly I found I could actually eat carbs again. I was actually in proper Remission and had a happy birthday party on the ward with choccie cake, 2 strudel tarts, about 4 choc cup cakes, and my bgl remained below 8. Unfortunately when I had the Op they put me back onto insulin and they controlled my diabetes remotely until I was discharged home and restarted my LCHF. again.
So most HCP's seem to regard control regimes to be needing to be between 5 and 13 for "good control". My GP wants me at 7, and I am currently running at 6.4 averaged.
My GP had learned to trust me and no longer lectures me. But I am the only one of his patients that is doing LC and staying off the insulin. He too has to toe the NHS line and the Practice could be sued if he advised a different strategy that is not in his procedures. This is the power of EATWELL. But they cannot force you to change to it. Only by applying for a court injunction or having you sectioned can they take that control. All they can do is refer you to another doctor or practice.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?