Hi to you all.
I'll quickly introduce myself.. I am a State Registered IHCD qualified front line Paramedic for over 22 years.
I've worked for the bulk of that time in London and done a bit in rural areas. I now work in the private sector.
I've dealt with (probably) most diabetic things from Hypos and Hypers to fitting to diabetic comas and everything in between. I dont proclaim to be a professor of Diabetes, but I know enough to deal with most 999 diabetic situations.
I only managed to get through the first few pages of this topic, befor ethe holier than thou attitude bored me... let me put a few things straight...
The first post is NOT a 999 call, in no way shape or form.
Sending am ambulance to anything is the last option your Trust has. There's several thing they can do before sending one.
Included are speaking to a paramedic or nurse on the phone for advice. If appropriate they may send an Emergency Care Practitioner round to assess you (if your Trust has them).
They may send a Paramedic round in a car to assess (it's rare but does happen)
The patient is conscious and breathing, can mobilse ok and isnt in a life threatening condition. No you dont get a 999 ambulance straight away.
First the 999 call taker triages.
life threatening = you get one in (alleged) 8 minutes
No so immediate = you'll get one in (alleged)
The DSN advice could be regarded as wrong... re-hydrating is the answer. "going on a drip" is over used by everyone.
The excuse of "I dont have any money for transport is poor" It's not the NHS fault you have no money for transport.
>>keytones not being dangerous
**lol, no they are not!!
>>I believe this would warrant a 999 call for a ambulance, Probably most of the ambulance staff were on their annual sick leave
**that's offensive, no one goes on "annual sick leave"
>>A complain letter to your MP may help
**nope
>>Sorry if I'm being blunt, but couldn't you have got her there yourself or get a taxi. 999 calls are for people who really really are in trouble.
**HOOORAAYYY...
>>If your wife was able to mobilise and talk then they would not class her as a priority over those people having heart attacks and cardiac arrests, so therefore it would have been quicker for you to take her in yourself anyway.
**HOORRAYYYYY
>>and as an update to show just how good the NHS is my wife was not offered a drink of water in A&E (while in the cubical) and was not checked on.
**Did you help yourself?? every single A&E has public drinking facilities, did you even ask???
>>if her DNS had not called the A&E department she would have been in a coma about now as she was starting to lapse in to unconsciousness when they went in to talk to her.
**unlikely
>>Well, no. The person dialling 999 is, by and large, not qualified to tell if a situation requires an ambulance or not.
**Yes they are, 999 call takers have extensive training and in some Trusts they use Paramedics and nurses as call takers.
>>and 90% of the time neither is the operator on the other end of the phone.
**Above
>>I can't believe they wouldn't send an ambulance, although, we had our own little experience last Christmas with my mum, she rang up with tightness in her chest and pain down her arm
you sure she answered the call takers questions correctly?? They can ONLY go on the information supplied. If mum never said **CHEST PAINS then it doesnt trigger the chest pain algorithm.
>>It is quite bad that they decide off a script, you'd think they would receive some basic training before being allowed to go on the phones, maybe I'm being daft I don't know, just my opinion
**ABOVE
>>pre eclampsia/Eclampsia comes to mind and that is serious.
**OMG where did that come from...you're just making this up now.
>>you should have taken your wife to the nearest town centre, plonked a bottle of alcohol in her hands and told her to lie down on the pavement, vomit and hurl abuse at passers by. The police would have arrived in no time followed by an ambulance and she'd have been treated with the utmost care when she reached A & E ...
**Offensive, it's never ever been like that.
>>Sorry for the sarcasm but this sort of thing incenses me when we have TV programmes openly showing us how many police and ambulance staff are required on a Friday and Saturday night just to sort out the binge drinkers and ensure they don't hurt themselves and yet a pregnant woman on the verge of unconsciousness is refused an ambulance.
**IT'S TV !!!
>> yet a pregnant woman on the verge of unconsciousness is refused an ambulance.
**Was she ?????
>she needed medical assistance quickly and that was stated by her nurse so I feel you were absolutely RIGHT to call an ambulance and to expect one to arrive.
**Explained above
Lightwolfe... so how did you get to hospital
how long did you wait in triage
how long before a nurse assessed your wife
how long before the dr came to see her
how did you get home from the hospital
There's a lot of very ill informed rubbish posts on here. NO ONE has the RIGHT to an ambulance, neither is it a privilege to have an ambulance.
You DO have a right to one if you need one. not because "I aint got a car or money and I cant get to hospital the neighbors are out and no one can look after the kids"