My advice would be to go here and hear a lecture by the fantastic Prof Roy Taylor showing and explaining the true science behind diabetes reversal to the "Foundation of European Nurses in Diabetes" conference 2012
Eating Through The Myths: Food, Health and HappinessTaylor, Prof. R., Berlin, 28-Sep-12
In a talk published by online resource Medscape in December 2003, diabetes expert Roy Taylor, MD, professor of medicine at Newcastle University in the United Kingdom, stated that even good blood glucose control doesn’t slow the progression of complications much. Dr. Taylor said that the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS, a landmark 20-year study published in 1998) showed that “intensive therapy made a difference” in eye damage, “but not a staggering difference, [and]…abnormal nerve function continues to progress.” Intensive blood glucose control, furthermore, “does not seem to be able to stop kidney damage.”
The UKPDS findings led Dr. Taylor and many others to conclude that ultimately, nothing can be done to stop the damage caused by Type 2 diabetes, so people who have it essentially got the message, “Do the best you can; we’ll help you with drugs, but you’ll go downhill anyway.”
Is Roy Taylor fantastic? I need to watch the whole video, but his misinterpretation of the UKPDS data is one of the "crimes against low-carbing". If you read Jenny Ruhl's book he comes across as the villain who suggests that T2 Diabetes is progressive no matter what you do.
I think what you say is totally correct and I agree with you. However I strongly suspect he (roy) would not agree with his own comments now. After all I think (from memory although I will read it again) that individuals who had true "reversal" or were following a v low carb regime would have nowhere near the higher Hba1c levels attained by most of the subjects classed with "good control" in this study. Good control of this kind I would also suggest does lead to progressive worsening of Hba1c as age etc stops you being as active and does not allow you to eat as many kcal/carbs as you did when younger?
@borofergie I just realised when I watched the vid again Roy is actually quoting the UKPDS study and then goes on to show how you can avoid this "steady miserable rise in Hba1c" with the rest of his lecture. So I'd say he has seen the light if you pardon the slight pun.If that is the case Trots, then he truly is an admirable fella - it takes courage to admit that you were wrong. If only the rest of the establishment could do that, we'd have the whole diabetes thing licked.
The problem with UKPDS is that the "intensive control" that he talked about still resulted HbA1c of 7%, in other words it wasn't really intensive at all. It's not surprising that almost all of them suffered complications. I actually take UKPDS as an indication that, no-matter how much medication you take, you'll suffer complications if you eat a high carbohydrate diet.
Thanks for posting the video - I'm looking forward to watching it!
i would like to believe it could be reverse and one day the medical world acknowledge this .
medical is always progressing. even some medication are approved and then withdrawn later.
for years, many researches are funded by food and medical companies. it is with no surprise that most researches will be on their favour
roy made the statement while being a visiting lecturer to havard that even controlling hba1c will progressively bring you down.
his studies in newcastle is fund by a non profit group, focusing on non medical control of diabetes.
I don't like EXPERTS 'cos an EX is a has-been and a SPURT is a drip under pressure!! xThat's exactly the negative rubbish that pushes people up the NHS medication helter-skelter.
If I'd have listened to him when I was diagnosed, I'd probably be on insulin by now.
It's a bit like how long is a piece of string? Whether it's reversed or not only matters to me if it stops the progression, which is all I'm hoping for. I plan on eating LCHF for the rest of my life for that reason. I'm not looking for some miracle cure that's going to allow me to go back to shovelling heaps of overly-processed carbs down my throat - not now that I know how great I feel without that frankenfood. Why would I ever want to go back to the godawful way I felt at diagnosis?
I think all of this information needs to be presented to type 2 diabetics on diagnosis. Nothing like it was told to me when I was diagnosed Type 2 in 2012.
Seems to be too late for me now (as evidenced by continued high BG despite weight loss and recent experiments with fasting) - and probably too late when I was diagnosed as I'd had 2 previous prediabetic diagnoses before that when weight was gained, reversed when weight lost. I seem to have had varying degrees of metabolic syndrome for 20+ years.
I would urge any recently diagnosed person, especially those with prediabetic status, to follow one of the reversal protocols ASAP and to take the advice not to regain weight very seriously indeed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?