xyzzy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,950
- Type of diabetes
- Other
- Treatment type
- Diet only
- Dislikes
- Undeserving authority figures of all kinds and idiots.
Oh how I love this thread it's really bitchy :lol:
and to make things better I now learn that as well as the "H" word we now have the "F" word as well.
Let's stir it up some more :twisted:
Sometimes I do wish my GP a couple of years ago at my annual check up had said "Well Mr xyzzy my diagnosis is that you are turning into a weight challenged b****d (note the avoidance of the "F" word) and I do suggest you do something about it given your family history of diabetes." He was quick enough to encourage me along with the rest of the NHS to give up smoking (which I did) so what is the difference?
Of course if you have or had any kind of medical condition (physical or psychological) as to why you are "ahem" overweight that's an entirely different matter and I have the utmost sympathy for you otherwise the answer seems to be pretty obvious, eat less and if you're overweight and diabetic eat less and make sure what you are eating isn't killing you.
Let's add some more banned words how about the "E" word. I hate E. When I realised I had to make a permanent life change choice and weighed up eat less as opposed to eat slightly less but do loads of E, eat less won hands down. I do some E as I walk my dogs for around an hour a day and some mornings if I wake up with high BG's I'll do a 10 minute fast walk around the block that includes a reasonable hill climb just to kick my metabolism into action. Apart from that I am pretty much and happily sedentary. The trouble with E as far as I'm concerned is that its a law of diminishing returns imo, you have to do more and more to get the same effect and I know in my case it is not a sustainable life change long term. If you enjoy loads of E then good luck to you!
Another banned letter. How about the "C" word. There seems to be two kinds of "C" each having a fanatical and in some an almost religious following on these forums. We have the Low C's and the High C's Surely what's important is what suits the individual? To keep my BG's in a safe range at the moment I can only eat around 50-60g of C a day max which puts me in the Low C category (although some of the real Low C fanatics would dispute this). However I do look enviously at the likes of Grazer who has a less than 6 HbA1c yet manages around 180g / day and think one day perhaps... ... but not yet.
and to make things better I now learn that as well as the "H" word we now have the "F" word as well.
Let's stir it up some more :twisted:
Sometimes I do wish my GP a couple of years ago at my annual check up had said "Well Mr xyzzy my diagnosis is that you are turning into a weight challenged b****d (note the avoidance of the "F" word) and I do suggest you do something about it given your family history of diabetes." He was quick enough to encourage me along with the rest of the NHS to give up smoking (which I did) so what is the difference?
Of course if you have or had any kind of medical condition (physical or psychological) as to why you are "ahem" overweight that's an entirely different matter and I have the utmost sympathy for you otherwise the answer seems to be pretty obvious, eat less and if you're overweight and diabetic eat less and make sure what you are eating isn't killing you.
Let's add some more banned words how about the "E" word. I hate E. When I realised I had to make a permanent life change choice and weighed up eat less as opposed to eat slightly less but do loads of E, eat less won hands down. I do some E as I walk my dogs for around an hour a day and some mornings if I wake up with high BG's I'll do a 10 minute fast walk around the block that includes a reasonable hill climb just to kick my metabolism into action. Apart from that I am pretty much and happily sedentary. The trouble with E as far as I'm concerned is that its a law of diminishing returns imo, you have to do more and more to get the same effect and I know in my case it is not a sustainable life change long term. If you enjoy loads of E then good luck to you!
Another banned letter. How about the "C" word. There seems to be two kinds of "C" each having a fanatical and in some an almost religious following on these forums. We have the Low C's and the High C's Surely what's important is what suits the individual? To keep my BG's in a safe range at the moment I can only eat around 50-60g of C a day max which puts me in the Low C category (although some of the real Low C fanatics would dispute this). However I do look enviously at the likes of Grazer who has a less than 6 HbA1c yet manages around 180g / day and think one day perhaps... ... but not yet.