first14808
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 405
- Type of diabetes
- Type 2
- Treatment type
- Tablets (oral)
What I have been trying in vain to say is that Prof Taylor's METHOD ie getting the fat off the liver and pancreas to reverse diabetes works, nd it works for as long as the subject keeps the fat off.
But that's not necessarily 'curing' diabetes, just controlling diabetes via diet. And it may also highlight issues around generalising T2. So Prof Taylor's theory is fine, ie there's an ideal or safe ratio for pancreatic/visceral fat. That's a testable hypothesis, and Prof Taylor's done trials to do that. The null hypothesis would be if people end up in the 'normal' ratio, but remain diabetic. This may also explain the 'thin but T2' issue, ie those people may still have high pancreatic fat, but it's not obvious from just looking at them. Or it's about more than just pancreatic fat.
To me though, 'reversing' or 'curing' diabetes would mean I could eat what I want (or just Eatwell) and not worry about weight gain or high BG levels. And by normal, I mean a typical man-sized 2,000 calories a day.
What ND may be showing is it's possible to have a transient T2 in some patients. But other studies, like the Lim paper I cited earlier show a shrinking pancreatic volume in people who've been diagnosed T2 for 5-10+ years. If the media promote this as a simple cure, people may assume they've cured themselves, but their underlying T2 progresses, leading to permanent and severe damage. Prof Taylor's comments have usually been professional and cautious, the media reporting, much less so.