I can certainly agree that this debate is necessary I am sure we would all agree . As you are T1 I don't suppose you would feel as personally involved ut the furore raised by Chris steele's comments as a T2. I never write abusive letters to TV or radio companies but I do always ask them to comment or clarify.
I never like to differentiate betwen T1s and T2s because the things we have in common are more imprtant tha the differences to me.
In a way if you are T1 -you at least know where you are- I am not underestimating any of the difficulties and I truly feel for you all and can even understand why some T1s join in the view of the media etc re T2s having 'brought it on themselves"As you say we do NOT have his debate. Many do not know they are at risk and are only doing what their peers are doing.
Alcohol consumption is not necessarily the default factor for the onset of T2in slim people-I can vouch for that in my case.
No one knows what the trigger is for sure ,but we do know that there is a genetic component.
Basically I think we have to accept that T2s are those with impaired pancreatic function or some pre-disposition towards it..
At present there is no way of identifying these individuals so, as many of them don't understand the dangers or their own individual risk , it seems a little unfair to blame them for doing what everyone else around them is doing.
The only way to change things is to change the eating and drinking patterns and lifestyle of the whole population. Only then might T2 again become a disease of the elderly -occurring when the pancreas , not as functional or enduring in some as in others , comes to the end of its useful life or begins to show signs of so doing.