dcle2021
Active Member
- Messages
- 35
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Type of diabetes
- Type 2
- Treatment type
- I do not have diabetes
- Dislikes
- My diabetic nurse, and NICE guidance.
A lot of DN's still live in the dark ages, and for some reason think shaming a patient is a good idea, on top of being completely ignorant of the mechanics of diabetes. It is largely a genetic issue, though it can be brought on by medication use (steroids, statins), etc etc... But the bottom line; you just don't process carbs well, like others may not respond well to gluten or lactose. That IS something encoded in your DNA. Just like certain ethnicities are more likely to get T2, or are more prone to Brittle Diabetes. Genetics.Ok, so this page https://www.diabetes.co.uk/diabetes-causes.html says
"Type 2 diabetes causes are usually multifactorial – more than one diabetes cause is involved. Often, the most overwhelming factor is a family history of type 2 diabetes.
This is the most likely type 2 diabetes cause."
And this page https://www.diabetes.co.uk/causes-of-type2-diabetes.html says nothing about genetic causes.
Please confirm - is genetic disposition a cause of type 2 diabetes?
If so, why am i being stigmatised by my DN and made to feel like this condition is related to something I am doing or not doing? And if its genetic why would lifestyle change stand any chance of affecting my condition: hint - its hasnt worked and the only thing that brings by BG level down is sessions of 1h+ of vigorous exercise. Diet seems not to be a factor (albeit mildly, variations of ~2-3mmol/l in fasting sugar readings each morning) - exercise is a much bigger factor and can drop it by ~2-3mmol/l per 30-min to 1h of exercise undertaken.
I am just one of those people that has high background BG. Have there been control studies on risk factors for such people, please?
And this page https://www.diabetes.co.uk/causes-of-type2-diabetes.html says nothing about genetic causes.
A lot of DN's still live in the dark ages, and for some reason think shaming a patient is a good idea, on top of being completely ignorant of the mechanics of diabetes. It is largely a genetic issue, though it can be brought on by medication use (steroids, statins), etc etc... But the bottom line; you just don't process carbs well, like others may not respond well to gluten or lactose. That IS something encoded in your DNA. Just like certain ethnicities are more likely to get T2, or are more prone to Brittle Diabetes. Genetics.
Why would a lifestyle change impact the condition if it's genetic? It won't heal it, no. But it can control symptoms and progression. I've been a T2 for well over 5 years now (walked around with it or a long time prior to diagnosis), and I will always remain one. But . Take away the thing that aggravates a condition, and it'll be controlled. Same with gluten. If you're intolerant, and you don't eat them, your torn-up gut will heal. Lactose? Don't have it and you don't spend your life boated and with the runs. I have rheumatism, and certain foods and drinks can trigger a flare. So I don't usually have them. Makes sense, no?
You said your diet didn't seem to matter, but the last I remember from you, was that you were still eating bread and rice and such... Lower carb variants where possible, but still carbier than what a lot of us can get away with. Have you at any point just gone to the extreme of practically zero carb, to see what that would get you? Not permanently, mind you, but as an experiment. If you say your high background BG is an issue, you need to deplete those stores, most likely... And you'd do that by not putting new carbs in. Maybe try going carnivore for a few weeks (meat, fish, poultry, eggs, hard cheeses, proper butter, and nothing but that), see what that gets you and whether after a while, your liver'll dial down on the dumping some. Then you can re-introduce some foods that are carbier, like above ground veggies. But honestly, if after that trial you go back to breads, rice, potatoes, pasta, corn and such, I don't think it'll get you a whole lot of progress. But just try going really low. It'll make you feel ill most likely as you'll be dehydrated for a bit (can be solved with an electrolyte supplement/salts and lots of water!), but once you're out at the other end of it... Your liver'd have a lot less stored and you might be able to start with a clean (liver-)slate. It's just an idea, mind you, and I'm no pro.... But you seem to want to fight this and keep being told you can't. Well, you CAN. And if it doesn't make one iota of difference, you'll know to go back to the doc and get extra testing done. C-peptide, GAD, maybe Homa-R? See how your insulin production's doing. Because if a very low carb diet isn't working to get your numbers down, there might be something else going on.
This is pretty much what I'd do in your shoes, but it might go a bit too far for you. (I'm an all-or-nothing type, and I'm aware it's not for everyone!) I mean, keto's an option too, and others may prefer gradual dropping of carbs, but you seem really frustrated at the high blood sugars... So hence the advice to go to extremes. But don't do anything you're not comfortable with. I'm just throwing ideas out there.
Good luck eh.
Jo
A lot of conditions, including type 2 diabetes, have both modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors.
Non-modifiable risk factors include:-
Modifiable risk factors include:-
- genetics
- age
- ethnicity
You cannot change your non-modifiable risk factors but you can try to change your modifiable risk factors.
- diet
- exercise
- weight
???
Yes it does. It even has a whole paragraph titled Genetic.
Didn't you say that earlier that vigorous exercise was bringing your blood glucose down? If you keep that up on a regular basis, it should bring your HbA1c (blood glucose average over the last 3 months) down to some degree.None of the suggested changes to modifiable risk factors seem to work for me.
If your doc ignores your requests, you might want to get C-peptide, GAD and Homa-r done privately. Then if results are divergent, slap the practice over the head with them. They'd have to take action. If you went zero carb etc, your numbers should have improved. Since they didn't, that *could* indicate a T1 variant. You wouldn't believe how many people get misdiagnosed. Something to mull over.Thanks for the ideas.
"with practically no carbs in my system, I don't suffer the wounds that never heal, the thrush, the bad vision, the extreme fatigue or the NAFLD that went with it"
I have no symptoms. None. Failing to see why a genetically inherited high number has anything to do with my health I need to take action on.
Also, since I posted previously I have did carbs down to zero. Fasted, everything. Bit I'm still scoring 10.3mmol/l in the morning.
So no, it doesn't work unless I starve myself completely or do excessive levels of exercise. Which is, you know, unsustainable and life limiting.
My GP and DN refuse to test. I had to borrow a test kit to get these numbers. I keep telling them my experience and they keep ignoring me.
I'm really sorry, i don't know how I didn't see that. Doesn't help though does it? Non-modifiable as someone else also pointed out (thank you to them).
Why won't the NHS test properly?
If your doc ignores your requests, you might want to get C-peptide, GAD and Homa-r done privately. Then if results are divergent, slap the practice over the head with them. They'd have to take action. If you went zero carb etc, your numbers should have improved. Since they didn't, that *could* indicate a T1 variant. You wouldn't believe how many people get misdiagnosed. Something to mull over.
Didn't you say that earlier that vigorous exercise was bringing your blood glucose down? If you keep that up on a regular basis, it should bring your HbA1c (blood glucose average over the last 3 months) down to some degree.
When you say that diet hasn't worked, had you tried a low carb diet? How many g of carbohydrate per day?
When you say that losing weight hasn't worked, what percentage of your starting weight have you lost?
If your company is providing health insurance at no cost or cheap cover, then I wouldn't hesitate in using it.Thanks, this approach makes sense to me. I just switched job and there is private medical cover but I haven't taken it out yet because I disagree with that in principle but feels like I will have to go there.
Fasting might be counter-productive - if glucose levels go too low in the night, the body will respond by trying to bump them up and may overshoot causing a raised fasting glucose - rebound hyperglycaemia. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/heal...ses-of-high-blood-sugar-levels-in-the-morning0g of carb/day (0g of food for 48h) and I have lost 11.2% of original body mass. Which wasn't that overweight anyway. 107kg down to 95kg, am 187cm tall. Levels still randomly around 9-10 mmol/l at waking/7am.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?