The patient is diabetic with HbA1C >6.7%. Otherwise, he is healthy with cholesterol within US standards. Why would the doctor not recommend some diabetic medication to control his blood sugar?
I would suspect that it varies by location (country), and by patient's age and other conditions.Doctors have a standard procedure to recommend or not diabetic medicine. What is the standard for recommending medicine?
Maybe because medication has side effects, and diabetes type 2 will progress and require more and more medication if there is no lifestyle change? Change diet to low carb and there is less chance of diabetic complications, remission is a possibility, no medication required.The patient is diabetic with HbA1C >6.7%. Otherwise, he is healthy with cholesterol within US standards. Why would the doctor not recommend some diabetic medication to control his blood sugar?
Strange but true. My diabetes has not progressed at all from 1997 to 2021. I suffered a heart attack which required stents. The condition was diabetic, but the Cholesterol was within the USA standards.Maybe because medication has side effects, and diabetes type 2 will progress and require more and more medication if there is no lifestyle change? Change diet to low carb and there is less chance of diabetic complications, remission is a possibility, no medication required.
That said, my mom was put straight on insulin when she was in the hospital and developed steroid-induced diabetes, but then, she was going to die and anything she did eat was a win, because food had lost all flavour for her by then. The little joy she derived out of eating the wrong things was a matter of more-power-to-her. It really does depend on a whole lot of factors... How long will the patient yet live, quality of said life, odds of remission/complications etc... And not in the last place, how enlightened is the GP in question, as most will just write a scrip and wish you luck, which isn't the best method, really.
Does that help at all?
The 'standard procedure' depends on what country you are in, and in some cases how up-to-date the doctor is. Medicine isn't static, in the UK NICE guidelines are reviewed from time to time.Doctors have a standard procedure to recommend or not diabetic medicine. What is the standard for recommending medicine?
Hi, How did you manage to reverse yours?Maybe because medication has side effects, and diabetes type 2 will progress and require more and more medication if there is no lifestyle change? Change diet to low carb and there is less chance of diabetic complications, remission is a possibility, no medication required.
That said, my mom was put straight on insulin when she was in the hospital and developed steroid-induced diabetes, but then, she was going to die and anything she did eat was a win, because food had lost all flavour for her by then. The little joy she derived out of eating the wrong things was a matter of more-power-to-her. It really does depend on a whole lot of factors... How long will the patient yet live, quality of said life, odds of remission/complications etc... And not in the last place, how enlightened is the GP in question, as most will just write a scrip and wish you luck, which isn't the best method, really.
Does that help at all?
I went low carb. I responded badly to metformin, so I went looking for a workable alternative, and the glucose meter told me low carb was effective. And it has been, these past 7 years. https://josekalsbeek.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-nutritional-thingy.html is basically what I did, though I had to change around some things due to food sensitivities.Hi, How did you manage to reverse yours?
I went low carb. I responded badly to metformin, so I went looking for a workable alternative, and the glucose meter told me low carb was effective. And it has been, these past 7 years. https://josekalsbeek.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-nutritional-thingy.html is basically what I did, though I had to change around some things due to food sensitivities.
Hope that helps.
Jo
In my case, because the patient (me) refused metformin and controlled his blood glucose via diet.The patient is diabetic with HbA1C >6.7%. Otherwise, he is healthy with cholesterol within US standards. Why would the doctor not recommend some diabetic medication to control his blood sugar?
How can one determine if he or she is in real remission? I would say true remission is when you do not seriously try to limit carbs. Otherwise, it is controlled remission.In my case, because the patient (me) refused metformin and controlled his blood glucose via diet.
While I would agree with your definition, you've got to look at the reason someone becomes T2 in the first place. If it's weight gain, that is often caused by excess (also known as healthy by some dieticians) carbs, so reverting to a high carb diet may reverse the weight loss and remission. On the other hand, if the T2 was caused by steroids or other medication, I guess there is more hope of genuine remission?How can one determine if he or she is in real remission? I would say true remission is when you do not seriously try to limit carbs. Otherwise, it is controlled remission.
In my case, because the patient (me) refused metformin and controlled his blood glucose via diet.
The doctor did recommend metformin!
Metformin isn't a life or death medication, so recommending it is just that; a recommendation.
There are a plethora of reasons individuals will pass on Metformin - some to do with their relationships with the small room, and some just don't want medications, where there is any credible alternative. Some like it because they believe it has additional benefits, relating to heart or other aspects of their health, or that it aids weight loss, and some like it because it is a simple gateway to free prescriptions.
It is rare Metformin would not be an option in the future, to someone deciding not to accept that recommendation at that time.
That sounds more like a definition of cure to me. Most of us consider ourselves well controlled rather than cured, whether that by dietary control or medication. The official definition of remission is a hba1c below diagnostic levels maintained without the use of medication. Nothing about being able to achieve that without any kind of effort.How can one determine if he or she is in real remission? I would say true remission is when you do not seriously try to limit carbs. Otherwise, it is controlled remission.
I've been able to reduce my diabetic glucose levels to pre-diabetic/near normal, which I'm now maintaining by diet alone. I believe my diabetes was triggered in part by eating an unnaturally (and probably unhealthy) high carbohydrate diet, which my body ended up unable to cope with. Reverting to a lower carb diet - a somewhat stricter version of what I'd always eaten previously for around 70 years - has enabled me to maintain these lower glucose levels for nearly 10 year now, and going by my results my GP eventually decided I could manage without diabetic medication.The patient is diabetic with HbA1C >6.7%. Otherwise, he is healthy with cholesterol within US standards. Why would the doctor not recommend some diabetic medication to control his blood sugar?
How can one determine if he or she is in real remission? I would say true remission is when you do not seriously try to limit carbs. Otherwise, it is controlled remission