Eeeek - please don't think I was trying to educate you @pleinster - I love reading your thoughtful, intelligent - and sarcastic- posts and its obvious you are well educated about your health. I was merely using your situation as an example xxx.
Sorry to derail the post - just wanted to make that clear
Yup - we really do need to be asking these questions...and others - such as why would we expect drug companies to undermine their vast profits margins by including honesty in the mix? I wonder what changes might surface if our government could afford to run a national drug production service or NDS (aside from the obvious bad management at most levels)? More actual development of cures? A programme of weaning us off the surplus to requirement, needlessly addictive and ineffective meds? Improved general health in the population? Less mental health issues? Or...just a drug to make us all vote Conservative? My comment is more than a little tongue in cheek...and many drugs are of course life-saving and incredible....but still....there's lotsa brass in the business...and a hell of lot in the anti-biotic "industry" in particular. God knows what the side-effects truly are, but I'll wager there are more then written on little bits of paper stuffed into the packets. As for how many course of antibiotics I have been on (all rhetoric aside) I have lost count if I ever was counting...but a lot!
Highfat low sugar is betterThat's why Diabetics are advised to eat unsweetened, low fat, organic, yoghurt
My take on the program was slightly different.
What I think I saw was:
All people were on the same very specific diet for a set period, with regular blood glucose and gut bacteria testing.
They found that different people "spiked" their glucose levels with different foods.
They found a correlation between the concentrations of different types of bacteria and the number of items in the diet that spiked glucose levels (how "healthy" the diet was).
They then (if I followed this correctly) modified the diets to exclude the "spiking" foods, and carried on testing gut bacteria.
The ones who were previously on a "spiking" diet then not only felt better, but also saw their gut bacteria change to match the "non-spiking" participants.
One interpretation of this is that the gut bacteria may not GOVERN your reaction to food, but may instead be an INDICATOR of how good your diet is. From the study it is very difficult to tell if the bacteria cause the reaction or just reflect the different conditions in the gut.
What I mainly took away from all this was that non-diabetics were being advised to "eat to their meter" - that blood glucose testing (instead of a standard diet) was the way to develop a diet which was healthy for your particular body. Something of a "no sh*t Sherlock" moment for most of the regular readers here.
One big positive is if this research strongly suggests that blood glucose monitoring should be a major factor in the maintenance of dietary health then cheapskating T2s over test strips seems even less justified.
Could it suddenly become fashionable to finger prick in all the trendiest restaurants?
It also suggests the possibility that a stool sample might be included in regular diabetic screening to check how healthy your gut bacteria balance is. Or in fact, in all health screening. #postyourcraptoIsrael ;-)
I just wanted to join in here. I am new to the Forum and extremely sensitive to where my bs is. For the past week I have been cutting back even more on my carbs and also the amount of food I am eating and have lost 4 lbs and on several days my bs readings are lower but if I go back to eating a little bit more at my evening meal at 6 pm plus say some yoghurt and flaxseeds, my bs was still 6.3, 4 hours after eating which was disappointing.Agreed. We need some for some things, and I am grateful for them. I don't like being dependent on anything really, but needs must. I also don't like being dependent on a substance if we don't need to be. I think...culturally...we have landed ourselves with problems while also finding some wonderful treatments.
I just wanted to join in here. I am new to the Forum and extremely sensitive to where my bs is. For the past week I have been cutting back even more on my carbs and also the amount of food I am eating and have lost 4 lbs and on several days my bs readings are lower but if I go back to eating a little bit more at my evening meal at 6 pm plus say some yoghurt and flaxseeds, my bs was still 6.3, 4 hours after eating which was disappointing.
I am steroid dependent and have been for around 13 years because of mild adrenal insufficiency and I have noticed how over the past couple of years my bs have been creeping up from about 11 am onwards. My fasting bs is still ok and in fact I think I have a lot of trouble because my brain and muscles seemed to like bs around the 6 mark. Often my fasting bs could be 4.5 and this would trigger migraine. Because I also have other issues which I think might be connected to bs levels I have decided to be really serious about my eating even though I have been lowish carb for 12 years or so. I think the steroid is the problem but I cannot do without it or I would be dead!
Before treatment with the steroid plus thyroid meds I couldn't keep my bs up for longer than an hour at a time and it was horrendous. The stress it put on my body was terrible and I ended up with ME/CFS so its all been a big mess. I should say though that I was the original carbohydrate junkie having been brought up that way in the 50s when every meal contained lots of carbs. It took nearly 50 years to get over this and I am sure I made my health a lot worse than it would have been but I was definitely addicted to sugar and carbs! I was only really overweight though when the hypothyroidism was developing when I was in my late 40s together with the adrenal insufficiency, once I was put on the 5 mg Pred plus desiccated thyroid I soon lost nearly 2 stones and was back to 9 stone 7 lb.
Finally I have to say that this past week my energy is much better for less food and less carbs and I am walking further and more easily but still have to rest for many periods throughout the day but it is definitely encouraging.
Thanks for all the great, informative posts, I love to read of the experiences of others because we can learn so much.
How..do people think this bacteria issue or any underlying or dormant condition relates to someone like me, who gets diabetes after a lengthy period on a particular steroid ? My renal doctors all warned me in advance of my transplant that diabetes may develop after starting treatment with said drug (ie. it..is the cause...despite other less specialised doctors saying it must have been waiting to be triggered!). I would emphasize a relatively high percentage of transplant recipients go on to develop onset diabetes and then Type 2 while on a long term (probably life long) course of Prednisolone. Any comments?
My T2 is thought to have been caused by a three month course of prednisolone I was taking for inflammatory arthritis, so 'they' are hoping it will go away now I've stopped the steroids. I also have high blood pressure, IBS, Graves Disease and was taking part in a pre diabetes study at the time. Unfortunately although I was warned to be very careful about the DMARD I was also given for the arthritis - nothing at all was mentioned about the possibility of diabetes.
I've been following a LCHF diet, checking my bloods before and two hours after every meal, I don't snack in between and I record everything I eat so I know the foods that spike my blood and I'm avoiding them altogether. I've dropped from 78.6kg to 64.9kg since the end of December, still got a bit to go.
I wasn't surprised that the doctor on the programme had a list of foods that were OK and others that weren't and that so many of the foods that spiked her blood were on her 'healthy' food list although I was surprised at some of the things she could eat and the things that the person being tested with her could eat and the fact it wasn't as simple as 'carbs spike your blood' because some carbs did and others didn't and it wasn't the same for both women.
I can't eat grain carbs, not even oatcakes, without my blood spiking and my favourite jacket potatoes are the biggest culprit for me. On the other hand I had a couple of small helpings of trifle over the New Year and a small piece of pavlova a week later and they had no effect. In spite of being ok after both foods, they aren't foods I would normally eat, I haven't tried ice cream either, I'm just avoiding all the so called 'bad foods' like the plague. I no longer eat cake, biscuits, sweets or fizzy drinks of any sort. It just isn't worth it for me. Funny thing is - I'm never hungry and don't feel the need to snack.
I'm going to add a twist to this debate about the good and bad, since diagnosis, I have had a couple of my meds changed to a cheaper brand. Before this my metformin was changed to a cheaper brand three times, the wife has had her meds (pain killers) changed a few times to cheaper brands and has been ill because of it!
This has come from government intervention because of the cuts, nothing else!
Also how many times do pharmacists give you your full prescription even though you have either ticked the boxes or ordered them? The father in law hordes his drugs that boost keep giving him even the ones he's not using no more and the surgery has told them.
Good Gut bacteria are necessary and good for you, and I got tested positive for Helicobacter pylori, years ago and did the antibiotics treatment. No problems. I've lost count of how much of the antibiotics I've had.
In my twenties, I had a quince, (severe tonsilitis) which was treated by full strength penicillin for nearly six months, ruined my great singing voice!!!!!!!!!!
If you talk to someone who is allergic to penicillin, one of my kids is, you know how good they can be.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?