KeithSimpson001
Member
- Messages
- 17
- Type of diabetes
- Treatment type
- Insulin
The maternity rights we have are a direct consequence of a European directive (which I go through in my post above).
Not trusting politicians is a problem (and I would think we are all frustrated by how slippery they are) but not one that is directly related to the EU vote.
The democratic point is that we have elected representatives who chose those who represent us in the European institution that is the EU. The more we participate the more influence we have. The point about population size and proportional voting plays to our favour as the UK is growing at a larger rate than many European countries; if we stay in we can increase our influence. The EU is not a foreign government it is a collective institution representing the interests of 28 different countries; can we always have our own way? No, but neither can anyone else. Consider the opt outs that we have taken; we are not shackled to a runaway train.
The trade point isn't realistic UK GDP was 2,989 billion US dollars in 2014 and China's GDP was 10,355 billion US dollars (those were the most recent dates I could find for both).
The EU 'GDP' was collectively 18,500 billion US dollars in 2014. Who do you think would get a better deal in a trade negotiation? The UK or the EU?
Derris insecticide. I don't know about that but safety measures must in principle be preferable to no regulation? In 2013 EU member states voted for the continent-wide suspension of neonicotinoid pesticides which are widely blamed for the death of so many bees. A wonderful thing, as far as I can see, which would be impossible to do unilaterally.
Lastly, if you want to take on multinational corporations 1 country by itself has nowhere to go. If we increase corporation taxes as a punitive measure against companies doing something we don't like then they can just move elsewhere; it's only through collective strength that we could reign in a Microsoft or a Monsanto.
I think there is a lot wrong with the EU (not least the preposterous shifting between Brussels and Luxembourg) but we are driving off a cliff if we decide to reject it outright.
Thank you though for engaging with this discussion; I really am interested in what you think.
Best
Dillinger
Back in 1975 I voted to stay in a Common MARKET; we are now voting on whether we want to stay in what has evolved to become a European UNION. There is a big difference [the name change tells it all] but those campaigning for remaining in the European Union only want to talk about the 'single market' as if nothing has changed because they know [as you say] that in fact there is a lot wrong with what has evolved to become the European Union. All empires rise & then they fall, often because they become too big; one size rarely fits all for long & the Euro must be a good example of how one one size does not fit all. In fact regarding the Euro, as we are only one of 3 member countries outside the Euro zone [with Denmark & Sweden], remaining in the European Union long term must mean sooner or later & for better or worse, we will have to join the Euro.
If I may briefly return to democracy, we are far from perfect: No proportional representation for the House of Commons [first past the post]; an appointed House of Lords; no English parliament [despite Scotland, Wales & Northern Ireland having their own] & referendae only when the governing party is split. My point about trust was that I do not trust our politicians & by extension representative democracy itself; I would therefore prefer to see more referendae on important issues.
I believe there is a liberal case for leaving the European Union. The Liberal party in this country have always been the party to extend democracy & so central to that liberal argument to leave must be that membership is undermining democracy. Mikhail Gornachev once wrote: "The most puzzling development in politics during the last decade is the apparent determination of Western European leaders to re-create the Soviet Union in Western Europe"; he was of course refering to the European Union. Also the Liberal party was formed because of a split in the Tory party over free trade. So of course I understand why liberals want free trade with Europe but membership unfortunately takes away our right to negotiate free trade with the rest of the world & waiting for 27 other countries to agree is why the European Union is slow to negotiate anything [yes 10 years for the European Union to negotiate any trade deals but on our own outside, I don't see any trade deal taking so long.. unless it is with the European Union itself of course]. Common external tariffs are about protectionism & not free trade, hence leaving should be the liberal way forward. Finally I don't think liberals like big government & yet [perhaps inevitably] that is what you get from bureaucrats. The problem is that every time government interfers & perhaps for the best of reasons, even Ken Livingstone once acknowledged there can be perverse [undesirable] consequences. Fishing quotas led to dead fish being thrown back into the sea; perverse or what? Of course that is one industry that the European Union has to take responsibility for destroying in our country.
Last edited by a moderator: