I'm not trying to upset you, but the problem I am having right now is trying to ascertain the facts. I've spent several days neck deep in the keto community on reddit and as with all things internet related it's full of opinions. Some are right, some, invariably, are wrong. From what I can gather, and not jsut from that community, there is a minimum amount of carbs asserted that is required for the body, the brain, to function. Now I don't know if that is true, or if 150g is true, or if any of this is true. All i know is what i've grown up being taught: that humans shouldn't eat sat fats, little salt, a goodly helping of carbs. What i'm hearing now turns that on its head. THis is desperately confusing.That is WRONG! A person can eat 80g carbs and still function. Or 100g. Or 75g. Or 110g. Or.....whatever!
This 'fat is bad' started in the 40's and 50's when a scientist Ancel Keys did two studies 'The Diet Heart Hypothesis' and 'The Lipid Hypothesis'. Without getting bogged in too much detail, consider that after all these years, it's still referred to as a hypothesis, and look at what's happenned to Diabetes and obesity since then. The more you research, the more intriguing it getsAs i start consuming a considerable amount more fat (eating more meat during the day, about 3x, frying veg for dinner in butter, starting to use olive oil), I find myself really wondering about these claims. The health orthodoxy staunchly argues, for whatever reason (and i'm not a big fan of conspiracy theories, I have to say), that fats are generally bad, particularly in excess. On the other hand there are those who say they are not bad, in fact they can be good.
Now how is a lay person like me, and possibly you, ever meant to know the difference. I'm not a doctor, dietitian, nutritionist, biologist, and I certainly don't have the luxury of being able to read the myraid books on this subject - and were I to do so the science within would fall on deaf ears since i'm no expert.
How do we know the truth, before we risk gambling on our healths - even for the best of intentions!
I think you might have misunderstood me. By cutting the bread/wheat I've cut carbs to ketogenic levels (as far as I can tell). There was no half way house.
So far I have not entered the ketogenic state, and am beginning to wonder whether I should.
The problem is that, while i respect people saying I should eat whatever feels good, there are established requirements for the body. 150g carb seems to be the minimum in order to function outside of this ketotic state.
I am eating low carb higher fat. some days as little as 20g some days as much as 100. I don't eat huge amounts of fat.I'm not trying to upset you, but the problem I am having right now is trying to ascertain the facts. I've spent several days neck deep in the keto community on reddit and as with all things internet related it's full of opinions. Some are right, some, invariably, are wrong. From what I can gather, and not jsut from that community, there is a minimum amount of carbs asserted that is required for the body, the brain, to function. Now I don't know if that is true, or if 150g is true, or if any of this is true. All i know is what i've grown up being taught: that humans shouldn't eat sat fats, little salt, a goodly helping of carbs. What i'm hearing now turns that on its head. THis is desperately confusing.
Right now, I feel ok. I think reducing carbs is certainly the right way to go. I enjoy eating cooked breakfasts. I just don't know if this is healthy.
The whole thing with ketosis is just bizarre. Who has ever heard of this outside of these sorts of situations? They don't teach it in schools of course! To me, the people experiencing it sound like they are having the time of their life. To my GP (one of them) it's a temp thing. I don't know if it can be argued as a natural state, or how people used to live before processed foods and the like. It also sounds like an awful lot of hard work, not least of all to maintain.
Perhaps i've made a mistake by jumping in to all of this too quickly, but i was so sick of the hypo episodes. Even without an official diagnosis, the symptoms were there: low blood sugar when feeling hypo. To me that's hypoglycemia; it may be the product of a **** diet or a poor metabolism. I now think the former, but what is the right way to go.
.................. I've spent several days neck deep in the keto community on reddit and as with all things internet related it's full of opinions. .........................
You were in ketosis while eating 80g carb? I thought 20g (give or take) was the trigger point?Ketosis is how most people function for at least part of each 24 hours - it is simply the state of using the body's reserves rather than what has just been digested. If you lower your intake of carbohydrate you will be in ketosis longer. You do not actually need to eat any carbohydrates at all - they are not essential for anything, but having mushrooms or tomatoes with your steak, or celery with the cream cheese does make things more interesting and you will have a natural personal level of gm of carbohydrate per day which will enable you to lose weight or control your blood glucose. I used to be able to eat 80 gm of carbs per day and as long as I did some exercise most days I lost weight I also felt great once I settled into being in ketosis most of the time. I hope that once I get back into a low carb lifestyle I can go back to those sorts of levels and start to wear all my out of date clothes - this time I will not be persuaded to eat a healthy diet as devised by the supermarket funded advisors.
If you watch the videos I linked earlier in the thread it would clear up a lot of the confusion. They are not some diet guru trying to sell you something and they are not advocating a ketogenic diet.
Of course not (though some may disagree). But i've actually been lucky enough not to have been in that situation.Your liver will supply whatever glucose you need. Stop for a minute and think. The last time you had a stomach bug and did not eat for a day or two did your brain die?
sorry i missed that link.If you watch the videos I linked earlier in the thread it would clear up a lot of the confusion. They are not some diet guru trying to sell you something and they are not advocating a ketogenic diet.
Of course not (though some may disagree). But i've actually been lucky enough not to have been in that situation.
But it's more the long term consquence of a drastically lower carb intake while not being ketotic. I thought the whole purpose of the keto diet was to alter your metabolism so that the brain did adapt to running on fats, which implies that, if you don't adapt, your brain isn't running on fat and you're going to need more carbs.
And i get that people are telling me I'm wrong, but i'm just not seeing it (so perhaps my brain has stopped working!)
Of course not (though some may disagree). But i've actually been lucky enough not to have been in that situation.
But it's more the long term consquence of a drastically lower carb intake while not being ketotic. I thought the whole purpose of the keto diet was to alter your metabolism so that the brain did adapt to running on fats, which implies that, if you don't adapt, your brain isn't running on fat and you're going to need more carbs.
And i get that people are telling me I'm wrong, but i'm just not seeing it (so perhaps my brain has stopped working!)
No, if you, like I have, fasted for more than 72 hours, how is it that my brain became more lucid and I didn't even know at that time I was in ketosis, I'd never heard of it!
You can live longer without food, than water!
You can survive, with rationing, very well!
The amount of food you actually need to live healthy, is low!
If you didn't know about ketosis, and you stopped eating spuds and bread, kept away from cereals and carried on eating the protein and vegetables you already ate, that would probably do it!
Ketosis is a label!
It's not a thing you can touch!
You are over worring about the low carbing.
You can low carb without being in ketosis!
Your metabolism needed to be altered according to you, and the best way to do it is by reducing your carbs! If it doesn't work and you feel better not doing it, then don't do it!
We have had great success as our success stories forum will reveal, most of them are never in ketosis, they have done enough reduced carb to get their blood glucose levels down and stable , which would have anybody feel very good and even healthier!
Only you know where you'll be happy!
What about the keto flu?No, if you, like I have, fasted for more than 72 hours, how is it that my brain became more lucid and I didn't even know at that time I was in ketosis, I'd never heard of it!
You can live longer without food, than water!
You can survive, with rationing, very well!
The amount of food you actually need to live healthy, is low!
If you didn't know about ketosis, and you stopped eating spuds and bread, kept away from cereals and carried on eating the protein and vegetables you already ate, that would probably do it!
Ketosis is a label!
It's not a thing you can touch!
You are over worring about the low carbing.
You can low carb without being in ketosis!
Your metabolism needed to be altered according to you, and the best way to do it is by reducing your carbs! If it doesn't work and you feel better not doing it, then don't do it!
We have had great success as our success stories forum will reveal, most of them are never in ketosis, they have done enough reduced carb to get their blood glucose levels down and stable , which would have anybody feel very good and even healthier!
Only you know where you'll be happy!