Thankyou purplesally. I have just been on CQC website but couldnt find anything specific to staff risk assessment. I even googled the phrase in relation to staff risk assessments and CQC. It is early in day and only on my first coffee so it could be me. I did wonder if it's on a provider only section that I cant access? Thanks again for your time.
-
Guest - w'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »
Covid and Work, Covid Advice and General Chat
- Thread starter Max68
- Start Date
No.
I think every argument and every piece of evidence should be scrutinised. And I think that areas where we are clearly lacking information, studies, and sensible debate are areas that need closer scrutiny.
which is a very different thing from the glossed over selectively chosen sound bites you seem to prefer lately.
Hi, sorry but those seem to be sweeping statements again. In your quoted article itself it says there is evidence of transmission between children. That is the science. Almost every sentence of your referenced article mentions transmissions, even though there are low sample size. That doesn't mean the cases don't exist, but that testing accross the world isn't as wide spread as it could be. However, they also say there is significant transmission within adolescent populations: 'Limited data on positive cases in schools have not demonstrated significant transmission, except within adolescent populations.'
Again, your quoted article supports neither side of the argument about whether schools should open without any measures in place, which I believe was the original question. It says there are cases of transmission, but with low sample sizes so far, and over an investigation period where most children have had reduced contact, many not attending school at all. It is similar to trying to reference a study measuring the frequency of Christmas songs played in shops throughout March-August. There might be some, but the setting of the study provides fundamental limitations about the conclusions you can draw.
This virus is not the most investigated in the world. It is novel. It was unheard of last year. Scientific studies have been pushed out, rushed, because there has been a need, but many have themselves admitted low sample sizes and the rushed nature of the process being a limitation. Think about how well diabetes is studied, and yet there is still so much we don't yet know. Robust studies take place over many months, and quite frankly we are almost still at the stage where the virus has only been investigated for many months (though we can make assumptions based on other coronaviruses).The facts are that healthcare systems accross the world have been overwhelmed. The logical progression is to proceed with caution so there is no repeat.
I fear this is going more and more off topic. This video shows 3 people of the same opinion talking about the economics of lockdown, no discussion.
This thread is not to discuss if we should be in lockdown, but to offer support and advice to those who are clinically vulnerable or extremely vulnerable ahead of returning to work. Again, your reference does not support your claim - no where does this chat show the 'death of logic and science'. It includes an economist pushing a recovery of the economy, based in a country with an even more stringent lockdown still in place. Healthcare systems were overwhelmed accross the world. This thread is to aid vulnerable and extremely vulnerable people in going back to work, while preventing those healthcare systems from being overwhelmed again. I don't think anyone here is saying we should still be in full lockdown as we were on the 23rd March. However, it is clear there is a threat of overwhelming the healthcare system if everyone returns to how they behaved pre-lockdown. You earlier quoted article clearly states there is transmission between young people. So it would be 'the death of science' if we put absolutely no extra measures in place in schools at all, as is being suggested by some.
Remember, a lot of things will have muptiple positive effects at reducing transmission of other communicable diseases also, keeping a little physical distance from strangers and improved hygiene are not there to the detriment of people.
This thread is not to discuss if we should be in lockdown, but to offer support and advice to those who are clinically vulnerable or extremely vulnerable ahead of returning to work. Again, your reference does not support your claim - no where does this chat show the 'death of logic and science'. It includes an economist pushing a recovery of the economy, based in a country with an even more stringent lockdown still in place. Healthcare systems were overwhelmed accross the world. This thread is to aid vulnerable and extremely vulnerable people in going back to work, while preventing those healthcare systems from being overwhelmed again. I don't think anyone here is saying we should still be in full lockdown as we were on the 23rd March. However, it is clear there is a threat of overwhelming the healthcare system if everyone returns to how they behaved pre-lockdown. You earlier quoted article clearly states there is transmission between young people. So it would be 'the death of science' if we put absolutely no extra measures in place in schools at all, as is being suggested by some.
Remember, a lot of things will have muptiple positive effects at reducing transmission of other communicable diseases also, keeping a little physical distance from strangers and improved hygiene are not there to the detriment of people.
Fairygodmother
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,188
- Type of diabetes
- Type 1
- Treatment type
- Insulin
- Dislikes
- Bigotry, reliance on unsupported 'facts', unkindness, unfairness.
I’m watching The Fat Emperor’s broadcast as I write this and I have to say that I’ve already heard a few assertions that I find too assured. For example, they’re comparing lockdowns without taking into account the stage at which lockdown occurred in different places; they’re comparing events in a closed systems area such as the Diamond Princess and open areas like protests; they’re assuming that known communicable diseases such as TB, against which there’s an effective vaccine, can be compared with Covid.
Fairygodmother
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,188
- Type of diabetes
- Type 1
- Treatment type
- Insulin
- Dislikes
- Bigotry, reliance on unsupported 'facts', unkindness, unfairness.
On returning to work, I’m lucky to be retired and can, with my younger daughter’s distant physical help, carry out my pension boosting job online, by messaging, by phone. I’m aware of building in measures to ensure the Covid safety of the people who I feel responsible towards.
I believe that the stricture that a work place needs to be safe is still operative. Would it help if all those who face returning sent a document to relevant managers and governing bodies listing the measures required to make them safe?
Maybe this has already been covered, forgive me if it has.
I believe that the stricture that a work place needs to be safe is still operative. Would it help if all those who face returning sent a document to relevant managers and governing bodies listing the measures required to make them safe?
Maybe this has already been covered, forgive me if it has.
The problem is there is so little "confirmed" statistics, information and advice re this virus even by the so called "experts" that it's pointless for us average Joe's from the street to make 100% confident decisions on our own level of safety. The level of conflicting advice from those "experts" is quite concerning,.
The perfect example is the sudden "claim" this morning by Oxford University scientists suggesting that levels of herd immunity may already be high enough in the UK to stop a second wave. Yet this comes mere days after claims from scientists that winter could bring 120,000 more excess deaths from the virus in hospitals alone, with hospitals reportedly already preparing for a second wave. So who do you believe?! Dr Hilary Jones sums it up perfectly in this article.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/dr-hilary-advises-public-vigilant-22370260
Re diabetes and risk there really doesn't seem to be any real clarification either. I scrolled through You Tube last night and found one video re diabetes and covid risk within the last two/three months. This was a video from a nurse with type 1 who was describing the risk but it was no further on from what we all know anyway from what was said three months ago.
It shows quite clearly that "they 100% don't know" and many are just guessing on limited theory and small sample size data. I mean you even have Boris saying "everyone back to work" when his Chief Medical Advisor is saying at the same time "carry on working from home".
Quite frankly it is becoming quite clear to me that the Government is downplaying the risks just to kick start the economy. There are probably as many infections out there at this point in time than there was when they instructed lockdown and yet their level of alertness has decreased dramatically.
To be brutally honest if this Government told me I could take off my seat belt at night as there are less cars on the road I would as always still keep it on!!!
The perfect example is the sudden "claim" this morning by Oxford University scientists suggesting that levels of herd immunity may already be high enough in the UK to stop a second wave. Yet this comes mere days after claims from scientists that winter could bring 120,000 more excess deaths from the virus in hospitals alone, with hospitals reportedly already preparing for a second wave. So who do you believe?! Dr Hilary Jones sums it up perfectly in this article.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/dr-hilary-advises-public-vigilant-22370260
Re diabetes and risk there really doesn't seem to be any real clarification either. I scrolled through You Tube last night and found one video re diabetes and covid risk within the last two/three months. This was a video from a nurse with type 1 who was describing the risk but it was no further on from what we all know anyway from what was said three months ago.
It shows quite clearly that "they 100% don't know" and many are just guessing on limited theory and small sample size data. I mean you even have Boris saying "everyone back to work" when his Chief Medical Advisor is saying at the same time "carry on working from home".
Quite frankly it is becoming quite clear to me that the Government is downplaying the risks just to kick start the economy. There are probably as many infections out there at this point in time than there was when they instructed lockdown and yet their level of alertness has decreased dramatically.
To be brutally honest if this Government told me I could take off my seat belt at night as there are less cars on the road I would as always still keep it on!!!
lindisfel
Expert
- Messages
- 5,853
I think this conversation shows the difference between being open minded and having an agenda. D
HSSS
Expert
“Except within adolescent populations. “ Isn’t that secondary school? The ones that are in “bubbles“ of 350 pupil year groups, moving classes to a different sardine packed classroom every hour? And not expected or even allowed to wear masks have barriers etc
How many adults would go to their office if this was what their bosses demanded? Not that many.
And to not send them renders the parent a criminal and in the final year means messing up their GCSE’s. Hobsons choice right now
Bluetit1802
Legend
I am so glad I am retired with grandchildren well out of school and uni days. It must be horrible choices for those who have to go out to work (anywhere) and for those with school age children or grandchildren.
JohnEGreen
Master
- Messages
- 14,002
- Location
- Nottinghamshire
- Type of diabetes
- Other
- Treatment type
- Diet only
- Dislikes
- Tripe and Onions
Grandson starts his third year of Uni in September he will still be living in student accommodation so there will be about 200 people living in the accommodation block many of them new students very difficult to keep your distance though he was ill for a week or so in the last term with Covid 19 symptoms so it is likely he has had it recovered and optimistically may have some immunity his trips home will be very infrequent.
A thought has occurred to me, if children do not transmit Covid19 why is it still the case that officially grandparents are not able to babysit (unless socially distancing!)? This is the case if there are two parents and 2 grandparents.
Most children in school live in a family environment where anyone in the family may have Covid19 and some possibly won’t even know. Personally, I think everyone should wear a mask in school but this has been ruled out by the government. I contacted my head as I work in school. I am currently working in isolation but returning to the classroom in September. My doctor has said it is important I socially distance. This is impossible in a classroom with 30 children and another adult. I have asked if I can wear a face visor (so the children can still see my face). She has agreed if I feel I need to but I must explain I have reason for doing this to adults and children, though not necessarily saying what that reason is. I am buying the visor and keeping it clean. I am hoping this will keep me safe or a vaccine is not too far away.
Most children in school live in a family environment where anyone in the family may have Covid19 and some possibly won’t even know. Personally, I think everyone should wear a mask in school but this has been ruled out by the government. I contacted my head as I work in school. I am currently working in isolation but returning to the classroom in September. My doctor has said it is important I socially distance. This is impossible in a classroom with 30 children and another adult. I have asked if I can wear a face visor (so the children can still see my face). She has agreed if I feel I need to but I must explain I have reason for doing this to adults and children, though not necessarily saying what that reason is. I am buying the visor and keeping it clean. I am hoping this will keep me safe or a vaccine is not too far away.
Yes exactly - there is no evidence to say outright that children do not transmit it. In fact there is evidence to say they do transmit it, though the sample sizes have so far been low.
I don't personally see how we will have a widely rolled out vaccine before next summer at the earliest, but agree a visor seems a good go between so children can still see your face. This is particularly important for anyone with hearing impairment, though I've also seen some clear masks for exactly this purpose (with a clear section in the middle). I don't see how there can be any objection if you're funding it yourself? My school has said they will fund PPE for anyone who is expected to spend more than 15 mins closer than 2m to others, which I think is quite generous. This is mainly TAs and Fist Aiders. I don't see how they can object if you choose to buy something yourself though?
HSSS
Expert
My child’s secondary school has just published their plan (as it stands right now). They are trying to limit year group contact, have one way systems, closed changing rooms, staggering lunch areas/times, all seats facing forward etc. So they are trying, within the guidelines.
The trouble is the guidelines are wrong and contradict all other guidance they are giving regarding distancing/mitigation and sequential exposure etc. Nor does the plan make any allowance for the vulnerable - pupils, staff or families. They actually ban face coverings even though their guidance doesn’t say to.
For a break from the stress of this child’s “work environment “ I can worry about another child waiting on weirdly assessed a level results and off to uni halls for the first time this year......choice swayed by covid to staying more local in case of another shut down. Not sure how I’ll feel about his mixing at uni then visiting home.....so many conflicting issues to deal with in September. Oh and Mr Hsss lost his job too and has little hope of finding another in his field and there’s little out there at all right now. So I have every reason to jump on the economy/education bandwagon rather than be convinced we are potentially making huge health mistakes but I just cannot make that leap.
The trouble is the guidelines are wrong and contradict all other guidance they are giving regarding distancing/mitigation and sequential exposure etc. Nor does the plan make any allowance for the vulnerable - pupils, staff or families. They actually ban face coverings even though their guidance doesn’t say to.
For a break from the stress of this child’s “work environment “ I can worry about another child waiting on weirdly assessed a level results and off to uni halls for the first time this year......choice swayed by covid to staying more local in case of another shut down. Not sure how I’ll feel about his mixing at uni then visiting home.....so many conflicting issues to deal with in September. Oh and Mr Hsss lost his job too and has little hope of finding another in his field and there’s little out there at all right now. So I have every reason to jump on the economy/education bandwagon rather than be convinced we are potentially making huge health mistakes but I just cannot make that leap.
I think the situation gets more complex after each government conference. From August its between employers and employees. Education do at least seem to be trying to keep everyone safe,though quite how I dont know. Everyone is affected in so many ways and there are so few reliable solutions and no one really knows the answers yet. I too have frequently wondered whether I'm over anxious about the health risks. Then I have moments of clarity when realise that in my particular circumstances the cumulative risks including a mismanaged care home are high. My friendship group are the same, those of us who are high risk or who have close contact with someone who is are continuing to socially distance and meet in gardens etc. All those that work for local government are working from home and are expecting to until new year at least. My GP has somewhat grudgingly signed me off from work with anxiety caused by risk of catching covid at work. At least it gives me time to gather info on whether I resign or wait to be sacked. Its still early days and things can change rapidly.
HSSS JRT It is just that, early days and things change rapidly day to day. JRT, don't jump whatever you do, certainly not yet as it stops you qualifying for benefits straight away by resigning. Being sacked does too "sometimes" but it usually depends what for and I think it's more a case of major disciplinary action.
For instance today I received an invitation to a Team Teach Course in September. Hardly social distancing!! It does say on the invite however from the company that runs the course to mention if you have a condition such as high BP or diabetes. Spoke to the member of staff running it and they know my situation and we are all talking again mid August. If things don't change or they get worse I may probably self certificate for a week then get the GP to sign me off and then who knows - but I do know a member of staff that was off on SSP last year for 6 months, so that would take me to February next year and it's all about delaying as long as we can (in some of our cases) until maybe, you never know therapeutics may arrive that stops the pneumonia for instance!
The briefings today have basically confirmed what I thought above. The Government are trying to avoid the blame game by placing the responsibility on the shoulders of the employers. At first glance that may not seem great but it could in some ways be a blessing for some because rather than an employer being able to claim they were only going by government guidelines in any event of an outbreak, the Governments "cowardly" stance means it's all down to the employer! So in some ways you may get employers being "extra" careful rather than just be going by basic Government advice which is wishy washy at best!
For instance today I received an invitation to a Team Teach Course in September. Hardly social distancing!! It does say on the invite however from the company that runs the course to mention if you have a condition such as high BP or diabetes. Spoke to the member of staff running it and they know my situation and we are all talking again mid August. If things don't change or they get worse I may probably self certificate for a week then get the GP to sign me off and then who knows - but I do know a member of staff that was off on SSP last year for 6 months, so that would take me to February next year and it's all about delaying as long as we can (in some of our cases) until maybe, you never know therapeutics may arrive that stops the pneumonia for instance!
The briefings today have basically confirmed what I thought above. The Government are trying to avoid the blame game by placing the responsibility on the shoulders of the employers. At first glance that may not seem great but it could in some ways be a blessing for some because rather than an employer being able to claim they were only going by government guidelines in any event of an outbreak, the Governments "cowardly" stance means it's all down to the employer! So in some ways you may get employers being "extra" careful rather than just be going by basic Government advice which is wishy washy at best!
I have to presume you didn't watch it then.
lucylocket61
Expert
and do those same children not have sibling or go home? the idea that what is suggested is safe is illogical.
lucylocket61
Expert
If I can get the virus from hand transmission from a tin of beans in a supermarket, how can I not get the virus from hand or clothing, or schools items transmission from children of any age? If I can get the virus from my post or shopping, how does it mysteriously jump off children or is rendered safe by touching their items or bodies? Do they have an invisible force field which renders the virus inert?
There is no logic to the claims that schools and children are safe. It is merely that we consumer units (people) are being driven back to work at the risk of ourselves and our children's lives or future health.
