SunnyExpat
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,230
- Type of diabetes
- Prefer not to say
- Treatment type
- Tablets (oral)
I have a belief mainly based on the fact the Newcastle diet was very specific in the blend of food groups, and there hasn't been a great deal of investigation into how it worked. But it did seem to, so for the sake of a diet for 8 weeks, I would do it as it was originally done.
I was lucky, in that I did a food version, rather than shakes, but it was virtually no fat, little protein, mainly salad and veg. In spite of dire warnings, I came to no harm, no gallstones, no terrible hunger, no starvation mode, no metabolism disasters, no yo yo weight gain.
I do seem to have driven my type 2 away though.
Some on here wouldn't be happy without adding fat, or be happy to eat the amount of carbs on the original Newcastle diet.
But it you look at results, those who do a close approximation of the original diet, do seem to be able to tolerate carbs better later, suggesting it does have a better result than variatons.
I was lucky, in that I did a food version, rather than shakes, but it was virtually no fat, little protein, mainly salad and veg. In spite of dire warnings, I came to no harm, no gallstones, no terrible hunger, no starvation mode, no metabolism disasters, no yo yo weight gain.
I do seem to have driven my type 2 away though.
Some on here wouldn't be happy without adding fat, or be happy to eat the amount of carbs on the original Newcastle diet.
But it you look at results, those who do a close approximation of the original diet, do seem to be able to tolerate carbs better later, suggesting it does have a better result than variatons.