• Guest - w'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

Cholesterol: GP discussion and my decision....

Rachox said:
Have you worked out your ratios?
Click to expand...
Not quite sure where to begin on that - Total is 11.7, HDL 1.7, triglycerides 1.8 and LDL (this is the worrying one) 9.2.
 
LindsayJane said:
Not quite sure where to begin on that - Total is 11.7, HDL 1.7, triglycerides 1.8 and LDL (this is the worrying one) 9.2.
Click to expand...
I just use an on line calculator, maths isn’t my strong point! ;)
 
Last edited:
LindsayJane said:
This puts a totally different slant on things! Perhaps I've been overreacting (as usual).
Click to expand...
Just a "victim" of medical orthodoxy and uninformed doctors probably like so many of us.
I have started to question just about everything I'm "told" these days which can have some unfortunate as well as fortunate outcomes!
 
bulkbiker said:
Just a "victim" of medical orthodoxy and uninformed doctors probably like so many of us.
I have started to question just about everything I'm "told" these days which can have some unfortunate as well as fortunate outcomes!
Click to expand...
I am still very much a learner re diabetes and there is so much contradictory information out there! It's hard to know what to believe or what to do for the best. Thank you as always for your input.
 
bulkbiker said:
Try Dave Feldmans new toy and see how you come out on that one..

https://cholesterolcode.com/new-report-tool-launched/
Click to expand...
Thanks Marc, here are my results.
---------RISK REPORT---------
Atherogenic Index of Plasma: -0.342 mg/dL = Lowest Risk Third
Low Risk <––-0.342––•––––––––––•––––––––––> High Risk
Go to tinyurl.com/ycccmmnx for more on AIP

Framingham Offspring: 0.7 Odds Ratio = Low Risk
Low Risk <–––•0.7•–––•–––•–––•–––•–––•–––•–––•–––•–––> High Risk
Go to tinyurl.com/y5fc5adl for more on this Framingham study

Jeppesen risk tertial: Lowest Risk Third
Low Risk <––––[X]––––•––––––––––•––––––––––> High Risk
Go to tinyurl.com/y63xp7lj for more on the Jeppesen study

---------OUR COMMENTS---------
**This does not constitute medical advice**
• Your triglycerides of 1.0 mmol/L are typically considered optimal.

• We would consider your HDL of 2.2 mmol/L as strong.

• We'd consider your LDL cholesterol as in range for what we'd call a "Standard Hyper-responder". This is common for many going on a low carb diet. For more on hyper-responders, visit cholesterolcode.com/hyper-responder-faq. For a deeper explanation on our proposed mechanisms for this when powered by fat, see CholesterolCode.com/model.
 
carol43 said:
Thanks Marc, here are my results.
---------RISK REPORT---------
Atherogenic Index of Plasma: -0.342 mg/dL = Lowest Risk Third
Low Risk <––-0.342––•––––––––––•––––––––––> High Risk
Go to tinyurl.com/ycccmmnx for more on AIP

Framingham Offspring: 0.7 Odds Ratio = Low Risk
Low Risk <–––•0.7•–––•–––•–––•–––•–––•–––•–––•–––•–––> High Risk
Go to tinyurl.com/y5fc5adl for more on this Framingham study

Jeppesen risk tertial: Lowest Risk Third
Low Risk <––––[X]––––•––––––––––•––––––––––> High Risk
Go to tinyurl.com/y63xp7lj for more on the Jeppesen study

---------OUR COMMENTS---------
**This does not constitute medical advice**
• Your triglycerides of 1.0 mmol/L are typically considered optimal.

• We would consider your HDL of 2.2 mmol/L as strong.

• We'd consider your LDL cholesterol as in range for what we'd call a "Standard Hyper-responder". This is common for many going on a low carb diet. For more on hyper-responders, visit cholesterolcode.com/hyper-responder-faq. For a deeper explanation on our proposed mechanisms for this when powered by fat, see CholesterolCode.com/model.
Click to expand...
Nice one!
 
lucylocket61 said:
mine has Low risk for the first one, Medium risk for the second one, and High risk for the third one. Its like the three bears trying to find a comfy seat lol
Click to expand...
I have low, then medium-low, then medium. Three bears, just slightly smaller ones! :joyful:
 
Awww guys...I feel I am really missing out now. I don't have any recent cholesterol figures as I refused to have it tested at my annual check. I have so long to wait till the next one lol
 
lucylocket61 said:
mine has Low risk for the first one, Medium risk for the second one, and High risk for the third one. Its like the three bears trying to find a comfy seat lol
Click to expand...
Mine was low, medium, medium which seems far more acceptable than high! I shan't be complacent though - I do need to make some dietary tweaks.
 
zand said:
Awww guys...I feel I am really missing out now. I don't have any recent cholesterol figures as I refused to have it tested at my annual check. I have so long to wait till the next one lol
Click to expand...
They do a cholesterol test with full breakdown at our local pharmacy, on request for £16!
 
Here is mine if they are of any use for comparison, tested last month.

Cholesterol 3.7
Trigs 0.9
LDL 1.5
HDL 2.1

My GP said they were "Good good" with a big smile... :D
 
bulkbiker said:
Try Dave Feldmans new toy and see how you come out on that one..

https://cholesterolcode.com/new-report-tool-launched/
Click to expand...
I like this one

Atherogenic Index of Plasma: -0.368 mg/dL = Lowest Risk Third
Low Risk <––-0.368––•––––––––––•––––––––––> High Risk

Framingham Offspring: 0.6 Odds Ratio = Very Low Risk
Low Risk <0.6•–––•–––•–––•–––•–––•–––•–––•–––•–––•–––> High Risk

Jeppesen risk tertial: Lowest Risk Third
Low Risk <––––[X]––––•––––––––––•––––––––––> High Risk

Your triglycerides of 0.9 mmol/L are typically considered optimal.
We would consider your HDL of 2.1 mmol/L as strong.
Your LDL cholesterol of 1.5 mmol/L is considered optimal by conventional medicine.
Click to expand...

As Doc Sunny said "Good good"...
 
Back
Top