IanD
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,429
- Location
- Peterchurch, Hereford
- Type of diabetes
- Type 2
- Treatment type
- Tablets (oral)
- Dislikes
- Carbohydrates
Re: confusing advice
As a professional scientist, & someone scared by the warnings of complications, I sought carefully to follow the advice I was given. Until the complications set in, I was playing tennis 3 times a week (6 hours), plus 2 gym sessions. (2½ hours) My weight was stable at 13 st, & had dropped 7 lb since diagnosis. Since the recovery by low carb, I have been playing as much tennis & gym, wt has fluctuated around 12 st (BMI=25-26). I'm 72.
Looking at the available info from Exeter, the warnings DUK constantly sound concerning low carb are absolutely groundless. Until we get more info, we can't comment on the relative merits of the diets as used in the 2 year study. The 3 month study pointed the way to low carb, resulting in the 2 year study.
Just quoting one point from the Swedish 44 month study:
No. DUK aka Diabetes UK is the charity - web site http://www.diabetes.org.uk/This is probably a daft question but is DUK the same as this website Diabetes.co.uk ?
If Ian had been in training for a few sets with Nadal then maybe he would have needed that many but otherwise for a man of his age (sorry Ian) far too many.
As a professional scientist, & someone scared by the warnings of complications, I sought carefully to follow the advice I was given. Until the complications set in, I was playing tennis 3 times a week (6 hours), plus 2 gym sessions. (2½ hours) My weight was stable at 13 st, & had dropped 7 lb since diagnosis. Since the recovery by low carb, I have been playing as much tennis & gym, wt has fluctuated around 12 st (BMI=25-26). I'm 72.
The [Exeter] control group were put on diet that created an energy deficit - so based upon their calorie requirements to maintain the wt they were I believe they used a 400-500 calorie deficit. So I assume it was based on 50 % CHO.
The results are clear - at the end of the trial there was virtually no difference although the LC group lost wt faster in the initial phase - we know why as generally LC are consuming a lower calorie intake!
My own snapshot analysis on here showed that too!
Looking at the available info from Exeter, the warnings DUK constantly sound concerning low carb are absolutely groundless. Until we get more info, we can't comment on the relative merits of the diets as used in the 2 year study. The 3 month study pointed the way to low carb, resulting in the 2 year study.
Just quoting one point from the Swedish 44 month study:
Considering the solid evidence for the negative effect of hyperglycemia on diabetes complications as well as cardiovascular disease the present high-carbohydrate dietary advice resulting in unnecessary hyperglycemia and insulin resistance seems difficult to support [17-19] and for diabetes patients, current dietary recommendations seem to be a major part of their problem rather than being part of the solution. Carbohydrate restriction, however, reverses or neutralises all aspects of the metabolic syndrome [20,21].