• Guest - w'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

COVID 2019 Comorbidity with Diabetes


The problem is once this virus multiplies across the planet, surely it makes the possibility of a less manageable mutation developing more possible. The third world needs help, but we cannot fully help ourselves.
D.
.
 
Last edited:

then we agree.

as @Winnie53 fine posts i upped my Vit C, i take a little zinc as advised by a chemist friend and Vit D

will it save me if it comes ?..who knows.. but it offers a little reassurance that i am doing as much as possible.

i also upped my ginger tea, has helped with my asthma,
more the hope to keep me in tip top condition, rather then stop covid,
the idea, to best give me a shot, if i did get it..

interesting side note, if anecdotal

wife's
cousins husband got covid.
various illnesses T2D and strangely sleep apnea.
test as positive, self isolated at home.
has now recovered , no one else infected,
thing was he says the sleep apnea actually helped him as he has an oxygen mask at home and praises that as being of huge
benefit

it's essentially a CPAP machine, so offered a big advantage he felt
 

A very prudent move.D
 
Some of you may find this of interest, from our local police website.

They have the rules laid out and break them, and they will break your wallet if you do not comply.

https://mypolice.qld.gov.au/bundabe...-locals-to-comply-with-covid-19-restrictions/
 
Some seem to feel there are probably no more deaths than normal?

I doubt the medics in intensive care think this or those who organise cremations believe its no different, or the families of those who have died who were medics. .

Don't forget the considerable drop in traffic will have reduced the lives lost in traffic accidents or the injured in intensive care.

My gut feeling is this is getting horrific and pray the politicians will gain more wisdom.
 
We are also at the end of flu season, which could maybe have caused more non-coronavirus deaths. I cant find the article which said that the numbers are those who would not have died (except from old age over the next 12 months perhaps) unless they had contracted coronavirus. The numbers are extra deaths, just as the Winter hypothermia numbers are extra or early deaths of those who had a good chance of being alive if they hadnt become hypothermic.

I cant grasp why there would be a global hoax of the whole world deciding to create a pandemic scenario based on the manipulation of normal death numbers.
 

What a beautiful song to honor the hospital workers across Europe jjraak.

Just got off the phone with my mom. She lives 100 miles north of NYC. Her boyfriend's daughter is shopping for them, so they're being well cared for and are in good spirits. It's a beautiful, sunny day here. Going to get a walk in before the sun goes down. Before I got on here I looked at the local projected numbers for our county. They're thinking we won't hit our peak until August 28th. I don't know why, but I keep thinking the cases are going to begin leveling out soon. I realize now that's not going to happen. Flu season will resume in October or November. As one of my co-worker's said recently, "One hour at a time." Glad to hear you and yours are doing fine. We are too.
 
lindisfel said:
Some seem to feel there are probably no more deaths than normal?
Click to expand...

Not necessarily. Some just think that consideration of all data is important in order to gauge what is actually happening vs. what the papers say is happening. The two may align or they may not, but personally I don't trust any statistics as far as I can throw them until all available data (and impacts of missing data) have been rationally analysed in context. The curse of the engineer
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Goonergal said:
I found Dr Malcolm Kendrick’s piece very interesting - look and read beyond the headline!

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/12/the-lockdown-is-not-a-way-of-beating-this-virus/
Click to expand...

Epidemiologists were writing back in January about this virus becoming endemic in the wider community. It is clear that even if we are successful in stamping it out here it will be impossible to stop in central Africa (where incidentally there are new Ebola cases also) and India.

So unless we keep our borders closed for ever (not that we've actually closed them here) then we (the human race) will always have a problem.

The initial strategy was not to contain the virus though, it was to let it spread throughout the population. This was stated in early press briefings by Patrick Vallance, and is clear from documents that The Guardian newspaper has, (although the government still denies it.)
 
lindisfel said:
Looks like we should not expect to live beyond 80 after 2020!
Click to expand...
I can remember when living beyond 80 was considered a very rare and astonishing thing, and only a relatively few people lasted that long. And that is only a few decades ago. With the age of death having started to fall in the UK anyway over the past few years, not living over 80 is normal lifespan for most regardless of covid19
 
I’m reading more and more articles and anecdotal pieces about covid not being a respiratory disease at all but one that inhibits haemoglobin from working and transporting oxygen to organs eg this one that whilst is not scientific explains the hypothesis well http://web.archive.org/web/20200405...ht-have-finally-found-its-secret-91182386efcb. It would explain why vit c infusions and blood transfusions (from recovered patients) and why death rates on ventilators are so much higher than for other respiratory conditions.
I’ve just explained this to Mr HSSS requesting that he makes a lot of loud noise asking to try blood and vit c infusions before they resort to ventilation if he or I end up in hospital.
 
Last edited:
given the graphic accounts of fluid filled lungs etc, what other articles have you seen to substantiate this idea of it not being a respiratory disease?
 
lindisfel said:
Looks like we should not expect to live beyond 80 after 2020!
Click to expand...
Although the majority of those who die are in the older age-groups, the majority of 80+ year-olds infected with coronavirus do not die from it. The death rate for this group is quoted as 14.8% here:- https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-age-sex-demographics/ or around 9% here:- https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51674743

The death rate among younger age groups is lower so the proportion of those dying who are in an older age group is higher.
 

I'd like it to be true but I am becoming increasingly wary of certain articles which almost sound like 'Trump was right!' proclamations.

If it's true we will no doubt see it more widely accepted by the medical community soon.

Who (or what) is Liberty Ravenstock?
 

yeah, have to agree it was only the OMG that stopped it in it's tracks and we still are having to accept it in some form.
as it is if managed the only practical solution long term

nice post @Goonergal

not much new in there tbf for those keeping up to speed as you have
as have many others,
but good for those wondering just where we are headed.


and that to my mind leads on to a conversation me and the wife had.

the exit strategy.
it has to be, based on the above, a return to 'near normal' and managing the next waves/peaks.

with the better possibility, the care teams can offer the best assistance,
not be too overwhelmed AND the prayer that better drug regimes the re-purposing of other current meds such as the anti malaria for instance.

the issue then becomes testing and the lock down.

while we all lock down as a villages, towns, cities.

we perhaps do ourselves a disservice, by not ratcheting up a bit more.
civil liberties WILL have to be curtailed, in the short term anyway,
( as they are now,)

if we are to successfully navigate the road back to 'normality; whatever shape that takes.
The more restricted movement, now, assists us all later on.

Because once we open up, we NEED to be able to identify and locate hot spots.
asap, and just as in track and trace being used successfully in other countries.

Tightening up the lock down benefits us all immensely,
and keeping us more localised in our travels now,
helps us all in getting back to whatever our 'new' normal will be,
we need that ability, to narrow down WHERE an infection came from.

if it's just one household as now, that is possible,... a street, perhaps ...an area, ok if we have to,

But a full return to lock down for towns and cities, ?
that is not really practical, again and again.

And once we open up the testing regimes needs to be much more robust and fit for purpose
at the levels Germany and S Korea are doing.
we will have many more going to work and moving around then, and the better we prepare now,
the better prepared we are then

The rest of the world may be doing better at this, IF we don't adopt best practices.

And we will be crippling ourselves unnecessarily, as we lock down repeatedly if others open up and begin functioning ,
without facing the same issues.

The exit strategy while not something they are really discussing with us openly,
i would hope to god they are discussing it behind closed doors.
and it needs to have that element of restrictive movement NOW, to allow us to prosper THEN.
imho.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn More.…