Robinredbreast
Oracle
- Messages
- 18,446
- Location
- Planet Earth
- Type of diabetes
- Type 1
- Treatment type
- Insulin
- Dislikes
- Bullies, Liars, Trolls and dishonest cruel people
Now you tell me ! I've just had raspberries and arsenic on toast ! ( joking )
Mmm I wonder if he is an idiot re websites or getting kick backs???? Does that answer your question?
Wish I could remember what I said now .....If you want expert advice make an appointment with your GP.
Removed inappropriate sentences - Anna29
It was an invitation, if I remember correctly.Wish I could remember what I said now .....
Scardoc you are like a breath of fresh air....my point exactly....we cannot simply believe everything on here and ignore the scientists and acedemics...sure we get frustrated because a GP is singing from a standard treament songsheet which is way too old and hasnt been updated....but what about real quakery....how do we as patients distinguish the wheat from the chaf....and thats where we need an "academic expert"Just read this thread after a few days offline and, to me, there seems a blatantly obvious answer reference the question of "experts". We need both the academic experts and experienced living with it experts. Ideally, we need them to be close to each other too.
I do think that there is a huge danger, on a forum such as this, that we believe that we know so much more than the experts because we live with diabetes. Yes, if they are not diabetic then you have the upper hand when it comes to what will a jammy dodger to your BG level and how a pint of beer or four will effect you. But what about the biological and chemical side? These guys are experts because the have studied and been educated in their field. Their opinions have been formed through research of their own and of other experts in the same field. This should not be ignored.
The fundamental difference for me is that we know different things to them. I could sit and explain a day in my diabetic life and how my meals, mood and exercise impacted my blood sugar levels. They could explain why and what was going on.
We need the experts to do the research and to know as much as possible about how things work so they can come up with treatments etc. They need us so they can get feedback on what works and what doesn't work etc. I'm sure there will be a plethora of fingers hitting they keyboard now to say "but they don't know and don't listen" but c'est la vie!
I'm sure somewhere on this forum it says to always seek medical advice. I prefer to seek both, medical and patient.
Scardoc you are like a breath of fresh air....my point exactly....we cannot simply believe everything on here and ignore the scientists and acedemics...sure we get frustrated because a GP is singing from a standard treament songsheet which is way too old and hasnt been updated....but what about real quakery....how do we as patients distinguish the wheat from the chaf....and thats where we need an "academic expert"
Would you agree that a GP who has just come off the Warwick course and hasn't heard of Late onset T1 can be called an 'expert'. This GP is in other ways an excellent GP but don't assume that the diabetes training GPs and DNs receive makes them an expert. It's many years experience and the ability to absorb and sift information (if they have the time) that makes a good diabetes HCP. My DN is one of those but has sadly moved on with a promotion.Just read this thread after a few days offline and, to me, there seems a blatantly obvious answer reference the question of "experts". We need both the academic experts and experienced living with it experts. Ideally, we need them to be close to each other too.
I do think that there is a huge danger, on a forum such as this, that we believe that we know so much more than the experts because we live with diabetes. Yes, if they are not diabetic then you have the upper hand when it comes to what will a jammy dodger to your BG level and how a pint of beer or four will effect you. But what about the biological and chemical side? These guys are experts because the have studied and been educated in their field. Their opinions have been formed through research of their own and of other experts in the same field. This should not be ignored.
The fundamental difference for me is that we know different things to them. I could sit and explain a day in my diabetic life and how my meals, mood and exercise impacted my blood sugar levels. They could explain why and what was going on.
We need the experts to do the research and to know as much as possible about how things work so they can come up with treatments etc. They need us so they can get feedback on what works and what doesn't work etc. I'm sure there will be a plethora of fingers hitting they keyboard now to say "but they don't know and don't listen" but c'est la vie!
I'm sure somewhere on this forum it says to always seek medical advice. I prefer to seek both, medical and patient.
Would you agree that a GP who has just come off the Warwick course and hasn't heard of Late onset T1 can be called an 'expert'. This GP is in other ways an excellent GP but don't assume that the diabetes training GPs and DNs receive makes them an expert. It's many years experience and the ability to absorb and sift information (if they have the time) that makes a good diabetes HCP. My DN is one of those but has sadly moved on with a promotion.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?