You'd think that's true, but what if it isn't? What if there were alternatives that work for you? What would you do? Why would you judge?If you want to lose weight without access to labs you've pretty much got two choices.
Get extreme https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2013/may/12/type-2-diabetes-diet-cure
or find your typical calorie requirement for your age, gender and activity level, then experiment. Drop the calories, drop them some more, add some.
All depends on what you want to achieve and how quickly.
Which has been refuted and debunked beyond belief outside of some true believers like Fung and Taubes who have vested interests in continuing to promote it as a valid hypothesis.Perhaps you may find the 'Carbohydrate Insulin Model' interesting research, after all this is a Diabetes site not only a weight loss site.
Sugar calculated as what?Just to further the point:
carb calculated howJust to further the point:
Dr. Fung and Gary Taubes are by no means alone in their opinions on CIM. There are many who espouse low carb for weight loss and Diabetes management, even the NHS is making tentative steps in recognising (and giving practitioners permission) to prescribe to patients.Which has been refuted and debunked beyond belief outside of some true believers like Fung and Taubes who have vested interests in continuing to promote it as a valid hypothesis.
It would be helpful if the forum didn't recognise most links as spam
The source is listed in the graphicSugar calculated as what?
Hi Brunneria.Hi and welcome to our diabetes forum, @ATZ and @AnthonyDee
It is always good to see new members here.
I see that you are both in your thirties, both signed up today, and have both only posted on this thread.
I also note that neither of you have completed your profiles fully, so you have not explained your connection with diabetes, medications, and any other relevant details.
So (obviously this is speculation) I am wondering what drew you to this forum, this thread, today?
Could it be that you have vested interests in this subject?
Perhaps your careers? Perhaps a personal connection to the article being discussed?
Or maybe you have wonderful personal stories about how marvellously CICO has worked for you?
If so, I am sure that our members would love to hear the details - after all, this is a forum filled with endless painful, sometimes tragic, stories of how modern medical thinking has affected their health. And so many of us have personal experience of exactly what does, and doesn’t work for our individual bodies. We are, to a member, unique individuals, whose experiences rarely fit on to the middle of the bell curve. After all, if we did sit comfortably on that curve, we probably wouldn’t be here, since we wouldn’t need to be.
So please, I am sure I speak for everyone here when I encourage you to tell us your personal stories, and your personal experiences with CICO, and your reasons for joining the forum today, and posting on just this thread.
Was in fact Banting's Low carb diet from 1863 not 1939 and Banting didn't require the horse whip either.one of the very first diets for the treatment of overweight diabetics
The sources are linked in the both graphics. I can't link due to the forum restrictions.
Hi and welcome to our diabetes forum, @ATZ and @AnthonyDee
It is always good to see new members here.
I see that you are both in your thirties, both signed up today, and have both only posted on this thread.
I also note that neither of you have completed your profiles fully, so you have not explained your connection with diabetes, medications, and any other relevant details.
So (obviously this is speculation) I am wondering what drew you to this forum, this thread, today?
Could it be that you have vested interests in this subject?
Perhaps your careers? Perhaps a personal connection to the article being discussed?
Or maybe you have wonderful personal stories about how marvellously CICO has worked for you?
If so, I am sure that our members would love to hear the details - after all, this is a forum filled with endless painful, sometimes tragic, stories of how modern medical thinking has affected our health. And so many of us have personal experience of exactly what does, and doesn’t work for our individual bodies. We are, to a member, unique individuals, whose experiences rarely fit on to the middle of the bell curve. After all, if we did sit comfortably on that curve, we probably wouldn’t need to be here.
So please, I am sure I speak for everyone here when I encourage you to tell us your personal stories, and your personal experiences with CICO, and your reasons for joining the forum today, and posting on just this thread.
Banting's diet was for himself. It wasn't a treatment used in helping those with hypertension, diabetes and other conditions of excess bodyweight or studied in a research setting.Was in fact Banting's Low carb diet from 1863 not 1939 and Banting didn't require the horse whip either.
You should be able to,post links by now, unless they are to site found troublesome in the past.The sources are linked in the both graphics. I can't link due to the forum restrictions.
Shen et al 2016 and Dr Stephan Guynet a prominent obesity researcher. A quick google brings both up.
The sources are linked in the both graphics. I can't link due to the forum restrictions.
Shen et al 2016 and Dr Stephan Guynet a prominent obesity researcher. A quick google brings both up.
Trouble for you is it worked..Banting's diet was for himself. It wasn't a treatment used in helping those with hypertension, diabetes and other conditions of excess bodyweight or studied in a research setting.
Have a read around the Kempner Rice Diet.
No it is not. But if carbs are driving obesity why the continued upward trend?And Guyenet's graph scale is a case in point about data manipulation.. a reduction from 510g of carbs per day to 470g of carbs per day is hardly going to reverse obesity in the USA now is it?
Today I had 3g of carbs..
Plurry rice would be the downfall of me if I was to use that for a diet plan.Have a read around the Kempner Rice Diet.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?