hornplayer
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 983
LittleGreyCat said:Just revisiting this topic.
That 20% has a familiar ring to it, doesn't it?
Isn't that the same percentage as T2s who are obese on diagnosis?
Now correlation does not imply causation by any means, but it would be interesting to know how many of the 20% who were T2s and not obese on diagnosis are also the 20% who manage to establish control to the NICE standards. All, half, or perhaps virtually none?
Please note that this is purely scientific curiosity because the numbers seem so similar.
However there does seem to be a chance that some people who are unable or unwilling to control their weight before diagnosis may also be unable or unwilling to successfully manage their BG post diagnosis.
I suspect that the lack of freely available test strips may not be the greatest problem for the majority of diabetics.
The availability of affordable high calorie, high sugar, high carbohydrate food and drink may be more of a problem.
Coupled with the unwillingness of people to make sacrifices now in the hope of better things some time in the future.
If people are unable to relate to long term issues like pensions (relatively few people have been saving for retirement - so much so that the Guvmint has been making pension provision for all workers the default) then they are probably also unlikely to be able to relate eating and drinking less to provide for a healthy retirement.
Even with a strong, decades long campaign against smoking, high taxation, bans from smoking around other people, 'smoking kills' warnings on fag packets etc. loads of people still smoke.
So how are you going to prevent people from eating and living unhealthily?
:twisted: How about making being over weight a criminal offence? Punishable by being put in prison on a reduced diet and high exercise regime? Tourists especially beware!! :twisted:
Firstly, think how much of a vote winner that would be.
Secondly, think how much it would cost to implement (leaving aside the cost of the Human Rights lawyers).
Thirdly, think of the loss of profits of all the food and drink producers (noting that cigarettes have never been made illegal).
Fourthly, think of the impact of having so many workers in jail (although it might cut unemployment at a stroke as others are employed to cover their jobs).
Not sure this will ever get implemented? :lol:
So - does anyone have a scheme which they think would work in persuading people to live a healthy life and vastly reduce the incidence and complications of diabetes?
[For those T1s reading this - yes, I know that obesity is not a major factor in the onset of T1 however T1s are between 5% and 10% of all diabetics so addressing factors for 90% to 95% of diabetics is likely to be harder and cost more. Also, get rid of the T2s and there will be more focus on your care.]
Are we doomed to watch a generation (or two) die early before our children (or their children) really understand the implications of lifestyle?
Or will someone come up with a wonder drug which reverses T1,T2, lung cancer etc. and keeps everyone with whatever lifestyle free from heart, lung, liver, pancreas, kidney and other major organ failure?
Which in turn would allow everyone to indulge themselves as much and as often as they wish.
**** - this is beginning to sound attractive. :lol:
Now if they also invent a super-Viagra which makes a 60 stone immobile drunk chain smoker permanently up for it and irresistibly attractive to all women (ummm.....perhaps not to another 60 stone immobile drunk but there goes the equality legislation) I might be able to kick this diet and exercise malarkey into touch and get back to the 90% of the supermarket shelves I currently studiously avoid.
Cheers
LGC
Please note that reality was only slightly harmed during the composition of this post.
Neil Walters said:Take it to an extreme - why not just shoot them and be done with it!
hornplayer said:... is told by their doctor "you have this (fat lazy porker disease that you've totally brought on yourself), take these tablets.
Yorksman said:hornplayer said:... is told by their doctor "you have this (fat lazy porker disease that you've totally brought on yourself), take these tablets.
I think the proper term is 'great big fat hairy ass*d northern basta*d'.
The problem with doctors is that they learned too many greco roman terms, think they are Caesar and see the patients as Barbarians.
IanD said:Sweet sugar dumpling
I often heard this on the way home from work in the 70s - takes me back 40 years.
Neil Walters said:Are we drifting off topic a little - how do we press for better information to the newly diagnosed and better education of our kids when they are young - we have to arrest the tidal wave that is coming for their generation if there is continued fear, ignorance and apathy
Yorksman said:Neil Walters said:Are we drifting off topic a little - how do we press for better information to the newly diagnosed and better education of our kids when they are young - we have to arrest the tidal wave that is coming for their generation if there is continued fear, ignorance and apathy
It's never been easier for people to get themselves informed and the best you can do for your kids is to show them how to go about it.
It's much easier to seek out the wise man yourself rather than call out for wise men to step forward.
OI I Resemble that remark :twisted: :twisted:Yorksman said:I think the proper term is 'great big fat hairy ass*d northern basta*d'.
The problem with doctors is that they learned too many greco roman terms, think they are Caesar and see the patients as Barbarians.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?