Hi all,
I've recently been diagnosed with type 2, I say recently when in fact it showed up on a blood test in Nov 2016 but docs missed it until blood test this January, anyway I've been browsing the forum and see people recommend low carb intake to help with diabetes, my question is.. where can I find how many carbs I should be below and also is there a list of carbs per foods anywhere? I know it won't be a complete list as that would be impossible to compile
Thanks in advance for any help, taking all the info in is a bit overwhealming
Hi all,
I've recently been diagnosed with type 2, I say recently when in fact it showed up on a blood test in Nov 2016 but docs missed it until blood test this January, anyway I've been browsing the forum and see people recommend low carb intake to help with diabetes, my question is.. where can I find how many carbs I should be below and also is there a list of carbs per foods anywhere? I know it won't be a complete list as that would be impossible to compile
Thanks in advance for any help, taking all the info in is a bit overwhealming
@Bluetit1802 which meter would you say was best? I know one is free but i'd rather have the right one rather than the cheapest one
Hi all,
I've recently been diagnosed with type 2, I say recently when in fact it showed up on a blood test in Nov 2016 but docs missed it until blood test this January, anyway I've been browsing the forum and see people recommend low carb intake to help with diabetes, my question is.. where can I find how many carbs I should be below and also is there a list of carbs per foods anywhere?
I have both, and I sometimes use them one against the other if I get a reading I don't like or think improbable. Sadly, I find I quite often get rogue readings with each. I don't think one is better than the other, but I suggest starting off with the TEE2, since you get a generous starting kit including case, 10 lancets, lancet gun, 10 strips completely free. Replacement batteries are also free. In addition, their customer service is far better, with a real person immediately available on the telephone 24/7. They send very quickly by first class post wheras the Codefree people are much slower. I therefore suggest ordering the TEE2 initially, with one tub of 50 strips @ £7.75 VAT free. You are much more likely to want to contact Customer Service at the beginning and that is not available for the Codefree at weekends or in the evening after a certain time.@Bluetit1802 which meter would you say was best? I know one is free but i'd rather have the right one rather than the cheapest one
OMG you have lowered your A1c to my ideal level! Well done that man!!!Within a couple of months I had lowered my A1c to a "non-diabetic" level
I have read that although a new type of meter and strips have to meet this standard, no-one is looking to see if they maintain that. IMO the accuracy of the TEE2 and the Codefree falls way below what one would hope for.I have never used the Tee2 but from what is said on the forum they are much the same. All meters have to meet the same accuracy standards before they can be marketed. At the moment this standard is to be within plus or minus 15% (95% of the time), so none of them are 100%.
You could ring up and ask for your A1c test result, and/or ask to be registered to be able to see all your test results online. People on this Forum really will be able to help you much more if you can give them this information.@Grateful doctor put me on Metaformin 500mg 2 a day, I wasn't told what my HbA1c test result was, I didn't know about the test so didn't know to ask him for it, I have to see nurse in March so i'll ask her for it
OMG you have lowered your A1c to my ideal level! Well done that man!!!
@Alexandra100 I'll call them after work on Monday and post result here
I have a Tee 2 as a back up meter and a glucorx nexus issued by the nhs - they give BG testing results that are pretty much identical ( usually within 0.2mmol of each other)I have never used the Tee2 but from what is said on the forum they are much the same. All meters have to meet the same accuracy standards before they can be marketed. At the moment this standard is to be within plus or minus 15% (95% of the time), so none of them are 100%.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?