cugila
Master
- Messages
- 10,272
- Location
- Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands
- Dislikes
- People who are touchy.......feign indignation at the slightest thing. Hypocrites, bullies and cowards.
Hiya ann, isnt that where george [ gorgeous hunk] clooney has a place? Look out for him for me please and if you see him [lucky you!] let us know when you return. Enjoy your holiday too! ahhh lake garda and italy I wish! Anna.xAnn19 said:Hi Ebony321, I won't have problems not eating the cones :winkooops, already thinking of more than one!). I'll test after the first and see what it does to me, might have to miss out on full ones and just have a lick of hubby's! I do have some mobility problems tho' so I can't walk very far, the exercise bit is practically non existant. We're going to Lake Garda so will be taking lots of trips on the ferries.Really looking forward to going.
Ann
Hiya, swoooooon !!! definetely and he is available [hint hint ann !] split up with girlfriend . Anna.xebony321 said:I'm sure george clooney is better for your BG's than icecream is :lol: :lol:
But we've had a WIDE range of numbers on here already. And a wide range of people okay and not okay with higher numbers. I think it's been a very 'candid' and 'open' and completely - 'non-judgmental' thread. In every introduction thread on our forum - someone gives that wonderful 'newbies' list of what the medical world tells us should be our target for fasting and post meal numbers to avoid complications. I think everyone knows 'the guidelines'. I think, more like Daisy said earlier, that this 'ledger' of our numbers can help us discover trends in our numbers (whatever our target) and remind ourselves how we achieved this or that goal. That's the power of a thread like this. At a couple other forums where I started the same thread they're on their part 3 and 4 (new threads started by the mods because the others had gotten too long for the forum interface) of the same thread each with 'thousands' of posts in them. If I can speak as a relative 'newbie' to this forum but not a newbie to D - I'm SOOO impressed with this forum. Though I can see in the 'sticky posts' for the DIET subforums that the moderators have given strict guidelines about who can post in the low carb or non lo carb forums - (carb level always being the most divisive topic for diabetic groups) - this place has been THEE MOST NON-JUDGMENTAL and welcoming place I've been a part of yet. It's SOOO refreshing!! So if you're a person battling with your numbers and want them lower - please don't be embarrassed to post. It's a log only here -- and we're a big family sharing our daily experiences - and IF you read some techniques others have about controlling their numbers - AND IF, and ONLY if, it's your goal to get lower numbers - you can potentially pick up an idea or two here about how some of us get our numbers even closer to normal.Sid Bonkers said:ebony321 said:Seems to be the same people posting, Be interesting if more people jumped on the wagon, maybe some peeps are shy to share,
Hi ebony, as I'm sure you are aware I am very shybut thats not the reason I have not posted my fasting readings on this thread, I just feel that for some it may make them feel that they will never get low numbers if they see a lot of other members posting good results.
NewdestinyX said:Though I can see in the 'sticky posts' for the DIET subforums that the moderators have given strict guidelines about who can post in the low carb or non lo carb forums - (carb level always being the most divisive topic for diabetic groups)
Unless the new Admin etc have changed things that policy was relaxed some time ago and providing posts are not inflammatory then open discussion was allowed. Maybe Admin can clarify that one for us.
There's another thread I've started as a partner to this one at other forums that's more of a pure 'log' for your meal numbers. You can post one meal or more... So look for that thread.. That thread tends to promote conversations about what types of foods produce what kinds of 2 hour numbers for people and can start some helpful info sharing. So I'll start that thread shortly.
So it is OK to stick with higher blood sugars and A1'cs in 7-8% or even a little higher? We have no need to try for normal blood sugars? That would make life so much easier wouldn't itNewdestinyX said:I have never subscribed to the notion that a diabetic has to have NON-diabetic numbers to prevent complications. Our T1's will prove again and again that you can live 30-40 years with A1'c even 7-8 or a little higher and have no complications. Science tells us that 'some diabetic retinopathies' can start even in the hi 5's with A1c - but the vast majority of complications don't present until there's a rampant lack of control for very long periods of time and very high A1c's
I can see your points. The 2hrPP thread was only posted in the T2 sub forum as the use of insulin in T1's would skew the results in a sense. Though there are T2's on insulin too the pancreas being in the equation makes for some more interesting comparative analysis. If people don't like a thread -- it will die.cugila said:The problem with posting your own meal results is that everybody is different.....so just because one person can eat some Rice or some Bread without too much of a problem that doesn't mean that everybody can.......If I post my meal ingredients here and give MY levels before and after meals that might well be fine for me but I wouldn;t go saying to anybody that they should eat the same as it's OK.....I think there is a danger that Newbies who are already confused will get totally the wrong idea about how to gain better control. Just my opinion based on my experience.
Mostly there are many threads already about specific foods and carb values, personally I think they are more useful as they let people know that a particular food has a high carb value and may well impact their Bg levels substantially. I'm not really interested in what others eat as my tastes differ somewhat........
Great question! But I tend to really like 'focussed' threads on a forum and if we start a comparative analysis here -- it could really hijack the thread. Let me start a thread with your question, Cugila, and not answer here. And yes I've seen the NICE standards..I see you're from the States newdestinyx.......can I ask do you agree with the ADA guidelines and have you seen the NICE (UK) & SIGN (Scotland) guidelines. I wonder how much they all differ, if at all ?
Hi Pianoman. Welcome to the forum. I believe each person has to decide for themselves the risk to benefit ratio for a certain target A1c number - and factor in the lifestyle they want also. Everyone can read for themselves the guidelines from NICE, ADA, etc.. and then determine for themselves where they're ok landing. Too much judgement ends up happening on these boards when we do 'numbers wars'. I won't participate in them. Personally - my goal is to be in the 5% club for A1c. And I've been able to attain it through a combo of lifestyle change including diet and exercise modifications and the conservative use of insulin. That's my story. But this is a thread about am fasting numbers. I can tell you more about my personal story if you want to send me a private message. Good question though.pianoman said:So it is OK to stick with higher blood sugars and A1'cs in 7-8% or even a little higher? We have no need to try for normal blood sugars? That would make life so much easier wouldn't itNewdestinyX said:I have never subscribed to the notion that a diabetic has to have NON-diabetic numbers to prevent complications. Our T1's will prove again and again that you can live 30-40 years with A1'c even 7-8 or a little higher and have no complications. Science tells us that 'some diabetic retinopathies' can start even in the hi 5's with A1c - but the vast majority of complications don't present until there's a rampant lack of control for very long periods of time and very high A1c'sIs that what you are doing?
I didn't ask about your personal story. I am wondering how you reconcile your own aim of an A1c in the 5% range with your conviction that "the vast majority of complications don't present until there's a rampant lack of control for very long periods of time and very high A1c's" How do you know that..? because there are some long-lived Type 1s who are relatively complication free? Sorry if you see these questions as off-topic for this thread but you did bring it up yourself. Do you think this is good advice to be offering newly diagnosed?NewdestinyX said:Hi Pianoman. Welcome to the forum. I believe each person has to decide for themselves the risk to benefit ratio for a certain target A1c number - and factor in the lifestyle they want also. Everyone can read for themselves the guidelines from NICE, ADA, etc.. and then determine for themselves where they're ok landing. Too much judgement ends up happening on these boards when we do 'numbers wars'. I won't participate in them. Personally - my goal is to be in the 5% club for A1c. And I've been able to attain it through a combo of lifestyle change including diet and exercise modifications and the conservative use of insulin. That's my story. But this is a thread about am fasting numbers. I can tell you more about my personal story if you want to send me a private message. Good question though.pianoman said:So it is OK to stick with higher blood sugars and A1'cs in 7-8% or even a little higher? We have no need to try for normal blood sugars? That would make life so much easier wouldn't itNewdestinyX said:I have never subscribed to the notion that a diabetic has to have NON-diabetic numbers to prevent complications. Our T1's will prove again and again that you can live 30-40 years with A1'c even 7-8 or a little higher and have no complications. Science tells us that 'some diabetic retinopathies' can start even in the hi 5's with A1c - but the vast majority of complications don't present until there's a rampant lack of control for very long periods of time and very high A1c'sIs that what you are doing?
Again, welcome,
When you ask "how do you reconcile YOUR.....?" that automatically calls for 'personal story' elements to qualify the statements.pianoman said:I didn't ask about your personal story. I am wondering how you reconcile your own aim of an A1c in the 5% range with your conviction that "the vast majority of complications don't present until there's a rampant lack of control for very long periods of time and very high A1c's" How do you know that..? because there are some long-lived Type 1s who are relatively complication free? Sorry if you see these questions as off-topic for this thread but you did bring it up yourself. Do you think this is good advice to be offering newly diagnosed?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?