Ah yes, but not all fats are equal.
It leaves out more information than it gives. Perhaps those on that study who eat loads of animal fats also consume a large amount of carbohydrates! It also doesn't qualify what kind of saturated fats are consumed. Perhaps they eat a lot of chips fried in hydrogenated fats, or eat a lot of fatty meat from non-organically reared animals whose fat is full of chemicals and nitrates and obnoxious stuff. They are probably consuming a high level of Omega 6 and very little Omega 3 or 9.
I am sure that loads of fat is bad for you - if it is eaten with carbs. Because 'everyone' eats carbs they assume it has to be the fat that is at fault. Was it funded by the 'low-fat' brigade?
There again, it is typical of most of these studies which pick just one thing in common and assume that that is the cause. Why blame the fats and not the carbs? Just shows how data can be manipulated to give the answers they want you to hear............next week another result will come out to show something else. Yeah, yeah.
What about all the tribes and cultures that consume a lot of fat yet don't get pancreatic cancer? If you analyse their diet, they don't eat anything remotely resembling rubbish.
Although a mix of different fats and oils is better - butter, coconut oil, olive oil, cod liver oil and fish oil in general, and some animal fat from meat, my money is on carbs - particularly processed ones like our modern manipulated, additive-riddled, nutrient-dead and generally evil so-called 'bread'. Add to that the high-carb, high-sugar pies, pizzas, chips, crisps, cakes, biscuits, crackers, and other equally damaging rubbish that passes for food on the Supermarket shelves these days and it is not surprising that cancer, of any part of the body is endemic in our Society.
