one walk is only 15 minutes, the other walk I also use for something legal, but I take my son, he goes to buy my essentials, and I wait by the canalYou asked this question earlier which shows you are worried about what would happen if you caught the virus.
Yet later in the thread you talk about going out for 2 walks.
Both posts are fine in isolation, they show valid arguments, but they don't go together.
Why double your risk of catching the virus? Trust me it really isn't a pleasant experience and 35 days on I can still not walk more than 100 metres a day.
Your story keeps changing.one walk is only 15 minutes, the other walk I also use for something legal, but I take my son, he goes to buy my essentials, and I wait by the canal
I dont take a car, I have to walk to the shops, so I stop by the canal, so I dont walk as far, and my son continues to the shops and meets me back at the canal to walk homeYour story keeps changing.
As I am now in isolation, 99% certain I have the coronavirus, I will leave you to your conscience. You have no good reason to be out of your car on the shopping trip, or whatever your second trip is for.
It's true, my circumstances might mean that what I do is "fine" but that's not the point though. For once in all, this is the time to be an example of the best, don't do anything that challenges the advice, keep it simple, do 'the job'. Lead by example. Where did that go? I'm educated, privileged and not very important, I stay at home. On a small micro social level makes probably very little difference but collectively it matters. My responsibility is to all. My behaviour counts.People's situations vary, it's difficult to make rules that are reasonable for everyone.
It's true, my circumstances might mean that what I do is "fine" but that's not the point though. For once in all, this is the time to be an example of the best, don't do anything that challenges the advice, keep it simple, do 'the job'. Lead by example. Where did that go? I'm educated, privileged and not very important, I stay at home. On a small micro social level makes probably very little difference but collectively it matters. My responsibility is to all. My behaviour counts.
That’s OK as long as those in self-isolation at Balmoral say with its 50,000 acres, take into account the different circumstances of someone with children in a bedsit.It's true, my circumstances might mean that what I do is "fine" but that's not the point though. For once in all, this is the time to be an example of the best, don't do anything that challenges the advice, keep it simple, do 'the job'. Lead by example. Where did that go? I'm educated, privileged and not very important, I stay at home. On a small micro social level makes probably very little difference but collectively it matters. My responsibility is to all. My behaviour counts.
you know what I'm not going to take lessons from balmoral in true social responsibility! sheesh! I get it, i do, rules from the entitled and the privileged should be treated with caution. But I am privileged and I do have a responsibility, I can assess where I am in all this. so can everyone else.That’s OK as long as those in self-isolation at Balmoral at say with its 50,000 acres, take into account the different circumstances of someone with children in a bedsit.
I can assess where I am in all this. so can everyone else.
Agreed it would have been helpful to be very clear in instructions, admitting it was not subtle but did the job, we could understand that.Perhaps if they wanted that wording they should have added it like Wales did.
A few on the forum who have had the virus have reported stable, good BGs so managing them has been easier. It's a weird virus that doesn't seem to behave like others as far as BGs are concerned, but that is based on the reports of just a handful of people here.If a diabetic is admitted to hospital, is their diabetes managed? Wouldn't blood glucose levels rise and rise without management?
Dr. Vladimir Zelenko is a primary care doctor in the US. He practices in area one square mile in size with a population of 35,000. He himself is a cancer patient. He wanted to get ahead of the coronovirus so looked at the protocols used in S. Korea and France. With that information, he has treated 911 patients with a positive test result for COVID-19 or symptoms - (fever. cough, diarrhea, loss of taste or smell, etc.). He has one treatment approach for high risk patients, another for low risk patients. Outcomes to date: 0 deaths, 3 patients intubated - (2 still on, 1 off respirator), 6 patients admitted w/bacterial pneumonia for IV antibiotics - (2 now at home). He's using hydoxycholroquine, azithromycin, and zinc sulfate, all oral medications. Protocol is listed in video. Treatment goal is to avoid hospitalization. My kind of doctor...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?