Thanks Dillinger, that made my day. I always wondered why my sugars were perfect when i went carb-free, and why i lost weight. Ages since i went carb free but i've been wanting to lose weight, and am desparate to get my sugars sorted (my HbA1c's on 10% at the mo!)... so it sounds like an all round great solution. Always been there, but i just forgot the science behind how it worked.Dillinger wrote: So, the alternative reality that so many of us promote is; forget about all the fat and protein worries you have, eat more of them and less of the carbs and you will need to inject less insulin if you are Type 1 and produce less insulin if you are Type 2. Less insulin means less fat creation and if you are eating a low enough amount of carbs then your body will naturally start to metabolise your fat reserves; hence weight loss.
Sid Bonkers said:Because I watched his video Stephen, where he talks about his theory and I didnt think he was correct in what he said, can you not accept that I do not hold the same views as you. OK I was being flippant and trying to belittle him by saying "feory" 'in inverted commas' and I accept that was rather childish of me, but I just do not agree with him, is that a crime?
Sid Bonkers said:The £1,000,000 question and one that no one knows for sure, some people eat as an emotional response, others, who knows, certainly not Taubes/Groves etc
Sid Bonkers said:Carb control may be key to diabetic control but calorie control is the key to weight loss :thumbup:
Overweight or obese people on low glycaemic index diets lost more weight than those on high glycaemic index diets or conventional energy restricted weight loss diets, with the change in body mass, total fat mass and body mass index all significantly decreasing after the low glycaemic index diet compared to the comparison diet. It may be easier to adhere to a low glycaemic index diet than a conventional weight loss diet, since there is less need to restrict the intake of foods as long as low glycaemic index carbohydrate foods are predominantly consumed. In studies comparing ad libitum reduced glycaemic index or load diets to conventional restricted low fat diets, even though participants could eat as much as desired on the low glycaemic index or load diets, they fared as well, or better, in the outcomes than those on the comparison diet. Hence, lowering the glycaemic index of foods in the diet appears to be an effective method of losing weight, particularly for the obese.
borofergie said:Sid Bonkers said:Carb control may be key to diabetic control but calorie control is the key to weight loss :thumbup:
Not according to the decent Cochrane Review concluded that Low-Glycaemic Load Diets (low-carb diets) are more effective than either calorie restricted or low fat diets for weight loss:
Overweight or obese people on low glycaemic index diets lost more weight than those on high glycaemic index diets or conventional energy restricted weight loss diets, with the change in body mass, total fat mass and body mass index all significantly decreasing after the low glycaemic index diet compared to the comparison diet. It may be easier to adhere to a low glycaemic index diet than a conventional weight loss diet, since there is less need to restrict the intake of foods as long as low glycaemic index carbohydrate foods are predominantly consumed. In studies comparing ad libitum reduced glycaemic index or load diets to conventional restricted low fat diets, even though participants could eat as much as desired on the low glycaemic index or load diets, they fared as well, or better, in the outcomes than those on the comparison diet. Hence, lowering the glycaemic index of foods in the diet appears to be an effective method of losing weight, particularly for the obese.
http://summaries.cochrane.org/CD005105/ ... nd-obesity
Sid Bonkers said:But the quote you posted mentions low GI Thats an I not an L six times and low carb zero times thats 6
Participants receiving the low glycaemic index or load diet lost a mean of one kilogramme more than those on comparison diets. Lipid profile also improved more in participants receiving the low glycaemic index or load diet. No study reported adverse effects, mortality or quality of life data.
Sid Bonkers said:So in answer to my own question "What have low GI diets got to do with low carbing" The answer is very little to nothing at all. I know you like to argue with everything I say but this is my last post on this thread :wave:
lucylocket61 said:OK, deep breath:
Can anyone give me the Simple Ladybird Guide to low carb eating and weight loss please?
Simple words, preferably of 1 sylabal, and no arguing? :crazy:
lucylocket61 said:Ta Muchly. I understand every word you typed
weeezer said:this is interesting...my mum is t1 (37yrs, she's 61) and is going through a really insulin resistant phase. she HONESTLY eats meagre amounts of food, i.e. had an actimel for breakfast the other day because she is paranoid about pushing BS up (which it happily does anyway) - she has 100u+ of novorapid a day & 120u lemevir, and has put on weight lately - she cannot understand it. a doctor did say to her she'd put on weight with the amount of insulin she needs, and this is exactly what's happening.
weeezer said:sweetlea, i'm going to suggest to her she cuts carbs down a bit more forcefully. i am waiting to see a dietician and would love their take on it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?