Read it thoroughly, nothing new or improved stats from the IARC nonsense, from a paper that gets paid by anti-meat. People are rejecting fake versions, leading to a push to force legislative changes. An extract from their article:
View attachment 50945
No mention of the 50 - 60% of food being plant based with the processed meat, arguably the real problem.
My diet should be higher in meat to mimic the longest living persons in the world and those who have the least non-communicable diseases. Just , that like the China study, intense focus on 1 element and desperately try to find a link, whilst ignoring their favourite plants that have direct links to proven gut issues such as Crohn's, which then increases cancer risk by an estimated 20 x. We could talk celiac and what irritates that, whilst a miniscule amount of humans have technical issues consuming meat (usually following a disease state).
Rather than spout propaganda and ideologically driven nonsense, the Guardian should fact check the results of Paleomedicina, who reverse chronic conditions on a meat based diet:
View attachment 50946
Maybe the Guardian could assist Paleomedicina get their blocked publications online or again fact check the results here:
https://revero.health/category/success-stories/