Apologies Dark Horse, I did misunderstand you.
You are asking if there are any individuals out there who have followed a LCHF diet without losing outer body fat but have been able to lose enough liver fat in order to reverse their diabetes to the point that they can consume a level of carbs that exceeds their LCHF levels without any adverse reaction i.e. a non-diabetic reaction. Is that right?
If so then the dearth of answers to your question would seem to suggest that aren't many, if any.
Personally I would find it interesting to learn if anyone who had followed a LCHF diet, with or without outer body ft loss, had been able to reverse their diabetes to the point they could eat carbs that exceed their LCHF level without adverse reaction.
As I have said before I have read many many testimonials of people achieving fantastic blood sugar control with LCHF but none who seem to have achieved this kind of reversal. It the very reason I have wondered if the reversal of diabetes with LCHF is a myth. I have pondered whether it is possible that by starving your body of carbs you actually make it more sensitive to carbs, though I don’t know how exactly this might work, its just a thought. However the testimonials seem to suggest that once you go down the LCHF road you have to stay on it for ever. Of course this throws up the question of what exactly does reversal mean, and that differs from one person to another. Enough said about this already.
Then again it may just mean that not many people have read your question. Maybe post a new thread?
I think it's probably worth noting a couple of things.
Firstly, we're a busy forum, but even here, people can be fickle/easily bored/distracted or even just miss things. It often works out that a thread is busy to start with then as time moves on is populated by a smaller group of people, so whilst our member numbers are huge, not everyone reads every thread, and some just don't bother to answer, for whatever reason. That's all their choice and is just fine. That nobody posts about it doesn't necessarily mean it doesn't or hasn't happened.
Secondly, when people change the way they eat, they often plain old eat less, because they are concentrating on what they're eating, rather than seeing something, fancying it, and moving forward, hardly acknowledging they've actually taken on board food or drink. This can be particularly prevalent in those whose previous eating and drinking behaviour included snacks.
In all of that, what I'm saying is many people, when changing their diet, lose weight without trying. Indeed I was one of those people. I immediately started eating to my meter, but it took me a brief while to actually get a handle on what I, personally, could eat and drink.
I have never been a snacker. Snacks didn't feature in my childhood, nor as a grownup, although sometimes at the weekend, we'd have kettle chips and dips, on the run-up hours to dinner.
Frankly, I had trouble stopping losing weight, and that's not altogether uncommon either, so finding those who got things just right from the get go could be really rather rare.
Of course there are those for whom losing weight is a real challenge and I feel for them. It can't be easy trying your hardest, and doing all the right things, only to find your scales stick at an unwelcome number when it appears everyone else is disappearing down to the charity shops with their wardrobes which they have shrunk out of.
Diabetes is a very fickle condition.