In the UK there are 2 official terms "Remission" and "Cured" used within the NHS; there are codes for these every doctors surgery can use and forms part of a medical record. With this in mind reversed is understandable but not official (in the UK at least). I like remission as it effectively means, there is a potential for re-occurrence if a path is not continued.
There is the biggest elephant in the room however, I keep seeing from the likes of Ivor Cummins that only 12% of persons in the States can cope with the metabolic impact of the current food, even if this is 50% out, for me this shines a light on where "we" really are.
I have never seen anything NHS flagged as "cured", but in my own case my notes are flagged "Diabetes Resolved".
Now, there is usually a minor case of handbags at down on debates of Resmission/Resolved/Reversed, and I have no wih whatsoever to go there, but in my case, I feel resolved is a decent descriptor.
I'm only assuming that because it gives me more hope. But your pancreas must wear out quicker after a life time of insulin resistance. If we imagine there is a quota of carbs that we can eat during our lifetime and those with the most insulin resistance have reached their quotas already, so they (we) just can't eat them anymore. We've already had our share.This is assuming people developed diabetes by eating the wrong things. If you developed Type 2 due to some genetic reason, or if, as I suspect is the case with many people diagnosed late in life, their pancreas is "wearing out", then you are just in the controlled state rather than in remission, like someone with a peanut allergy who avoids peanuts.
Should there really be so many forms of processed carbs available to us if many people have the tendency to overeat and become addicted to them?Now see I see those things as two of the most measurable symptoms of diabetes, which I think of as the a metabolic inability to process carbs efficiently.
Social conditioning does indeed play a part in how many a person should expect a body to be able to process though. I guess in your case yours processes as many as you want it to. However should we not have a fundamental issue with carbs and they caused no hyperinsulemia or hyperglycaemia or other damage (ie we weren’t diabetic) would we really restrict them as much as we currently do?
I believe they should be limited in some way (but then you get into the area of personal freedom). Certainly not without warning of the detrimental effects excessive amounts have.Should there really be so many forms of processed carbs available to us if many people have the tendency to overeat and become addicted to them?
My husband is a bit cynical and believes cigarettes were originally introduced as a form of population control. Well, maybe the food industry is just part of a big money spinner and has no concern for our wellbeing at all and we are told by our governments and conditioned by our cultures to want to eat a certain way when really, it's just plain killing us.
And the traditional Inuit have a very low incidence of diabetes. (None?)I believe they should be limited in some way (but then you get into the area of personal freedom). Certainly not without warning of the detrimental effects excessive amounts have.
I was thinking of the likes of traditional Inuit that don’t (didn’t) demand the same carb processing as we Europeans and North American’s. And not stating I’d go back to the more “normal” way of eating by any means if I wasn’t diabetic but maybe not quite as low as I currently need to stay. I think I’d still stay under the 100 a day.
Jim I am 100% certain that reading some of your comments and posts had/have a massive effect upon my own turnaround and understanding of how to keep on fighting the good fight. I for one, am so glad to have you in my corner.In my opinion, no. If it’s gone then it’s gone. It cannot be diagnosed. No hyperglycaemia and no hyperinsulinemia equals no diabetes. If it did, then someone who had it, had it from birth. That’s probably a matter of perspective, but I take the position that T2DM isn’t something you “catch” and then have for life. It’s a symptom of excessive insulin circulation, which in itself is a condition accumulated over decades of eating a diet incompatible with the biology you were born with.
Speaking only for myself, I know for a fact that I do not currently have diabetes, but I am aware that I may get it again if I revert to a way of eating that necessitates excessive insulin secretion. But since this is never going to happen, it’s moot. I like to frame it as “life isn’t a carbohydrate eating competition”. It’s a non-essential macronutrient, so whether or not I choose to consume it is irrelevant as it pertains to what might happen if I do.
Others take a different view and that is fine if it works for them.
I found it really easy to drop my carbs and stop eating the items on that list of things to avoid.... If you do not know what that list includes, You may like to look it up!Totally. The first three months was blummin' hard but it does get easier. Unlearning a lifetime's habits doesn't happen overnight.
You would mention Fish and Chips. That is the one very high carb food that I do miss. However over thast 10 months I have floowed a fairly strict low carb diet and I feel better, have lost weight and have stopped taking insulin. My next goal is to stop taking any medication and to get rid of the DPN.
Will I be cured? I would love to say yes but realistically I have to say that I have succesfully enabled my body to work effectively and more healthy at a lower level of carb input. I am almost certain that if I stopped using carb control that my condition would go back to where it was a year ago.
I do have a CGM and I do feel that I might try some Fish and (very small portion) Chips just to see the effect immediately and at my quarterly A1c but I will not until I achieve the main goals.
For sure.Something that can kill you? You better believe I study the heck out of it.I just can not understand how people do not take a little time to educate themselves... It is their life I guess.
Mmmmm great minds think alikeShould there really be so many forms of processed carbs available to us if many people have the tendency to overeat and become addicted to them?
My husband is a bit cynical and believes cigarettes were originally introduced as a form of population control. Well, maybe the food industry is just part of a big money spinner and has no concern for our wellbeing at all and we are told by our governments and conditioned by our cultures to want to eat a certain way when really, it's just plain killing us.
But it isn't the sugar.The Western way of eating which has caused a diabetes epidemic is a relatively modern phenomenon. If we eat too much sugar then we damage our insulin production system and we may become diabetic. Stop eating sugar and you may be lucky and reduce blood glucose to normal levels, but the damage is still done. You don't recover from diabetes, you just reduce your BG to a safe level. Start eating sugar again and your BG level will rise and you will do further damage to your insulin production system..
I found it really easy to drop my carbs and stop eating the items on that list of things to avoid.... If you do not know what that list includes LOOK IT UP!
Then look up all the amazing things you CAN saftly eat and enjoy! Then STICK to it for better health well being.
YOU, yes you need to know this list inside out.
BTW Guzzler this comment is NOT aimed at you.... I just can not understand how people do not take a little time to eduacte themselves... It is there life I guess.
For me, it just means that while I have good control of my bloodsugars, no medication and no complications, I am still diabetic. That is to say, I remain carb intolerant, and if I go face-first into a cake and suck it down, my bloodsugars will hit the statosphere. Being a-symptomatic because of my diet hasn't magically cured me,......... I could walk under a bus tomorrow, but I feel fairly safe in stating T2 isn't going to kill me any time soon. If I ever end up in a nursing home where I don't have a say in my diet I'll kick the bucket right-quick though. But here's to hoping. So, to me.... It's just being really well-controlled through diet, permanently, and avoiding nastiness that way.)
I recommend that you stop eating those 'low GI' foods for a while and see what happens - hard core low carb worked for me - my gut is far too efficient and low GI foods are put through the mill and the carbs extracted no problem. They seem to cause a long period of high blood glucose rather than a spike, but I think that is probably worse than a spike.Your reply interests me as after 17 years of a low carb/low GI diet with loads of high intensity exercise my numbers are now going up and I reckon I am borderline to going on meds. I don't feel I can do anymore. I keep finding new (to me) natural substances like Amla which when I first start taking improves my Hba1c but over time the effect wears off. I have no symptoms and according to the diabetic nurse I keep up a good lifestyle.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?