I am a statin refusenik but the rationale is that because I have increased risk due to higher than normal bgs (most type 1s), I should mitigate my risk by lowering my LDL; the narrative is that your arterial wall is damaged by glycation and the body sends a sticking plaster/scab along to repair it (LDL) however too many scabs result in a risk of a clot forming and breaking away resulting in a blocked artery and a heart attack.Thanks both, I haven’t really tuned into the reasoning behind whether they are beneficial for my health yet, not sure if I am just a number to my practise or if there is a real health benefit there so will need to do some research but don’t feel happy about being told I have to take them because of my diabetes.
My Wife's GP prescribed full dose statins to start with without checking her records which showed she had had Hep A. Within a day or so she had bad liver pain and had to stop the statins. These pills can be dangerous in the hands of ignorant GPs.To me, one of the biggest dangers of statins is that GPs only know they may cause muscle/joint aches and pains. I reported a string of what I am now aware of as 'known' side-effects over a couple of years. Nobody took me seriously. No GP and no doctor at the hospital diabetic clinic I attend ever realised that acute loss of appetite, depression, memory problems and a resultant complete loss of confidence added up to statin intolerance. If you suffer any side-effects, they will not be recognised as such and you will be offered a string of other drugs to deal with the symptoms you report. It took me years of arguing before I got my hospital records marked 'Intolerant of Statins'. They destroyed my life, lost me my job - which I loved - and almost lost me my husband. He said they changed my personality and only admitted this when I stopped them. After about a fortnight he said the woman he married was back.
Please think seriously and if you take them, keep a log of any changes in your health/well-being that occur. Review it regularly and record which drug you take, at what strength. If you develop any new symptoms be suspicious.
@Juicyj - have you run your numbers through Qrisk3, or any other lipid calculator? There is another xxellent one, but I don't have a link on my iPad, and can't for the life of me recall the name of it.
Nearing middle-age at 32? I thought I was just getting on a ‘bit’ at 66 with type1 for 44 years!My GP started me on statins last weekI have a months-worth to see how I get on with them and so far, no problems, but in all honesty I don't know how I feel about taking them. The reasoning behind me starting them was because I have had diabetes for more than 10 years and apparently am nearing middle-age (I've just turned 32)
Apparently soNearing middle-age at 32? I thought I was just getting on a ‘bit’ at 66 with type1 for 44 years!
Nearing middle-age at 32? I thought I was just getting on a ‘bit’ at 66 with type1 for 44 years!
This article really shocked me and it is just one more reason why I would not touch a statin with a bargepole:I’ve received a letter and prescription for statins from my local GP stating that because I have diabetes the current recommendation is that I should start taking a statin - question is should I and what are people’s thoughts on this ?
My GP started me on statins last weekI have a months-worth to see how I get on with them and so far, no problems, but in all honesty I don't know how I feel about taking them. The reasoning behind me starting them was because I have had diabetes for more than 10 years and apparently am nearing middle-age (I've just turned 32)
This article really shocked me and it is just one more reason why I would not touch a statin with a bargepole:
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200108-the-medications-that-change-who-we-are