On a slightly different note, and hypothetically speaking, if the EU governance structure, ahead of the referendum had been proposed as follows, what would your view have been and why?
1. European Parliament - pretty much as it is now. MEP numbers based on population of member states.
2. European council: MEPs elect 2 representatives per member state to act as a check and balance for the parliament. Run as a publicly responsible body.
3. European Commission disbanded and European Civil Service replaced it with powers similar to those of UK Civil Service.
4. European president elected across the entire EU by public vote and could stand for a maximum of three, three year terms.
5. All member state responsibility for monetary, fiscal, tax, health, defence, industry and migration given up to the governing bodies of the EU.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1. European Parliament - pretty much as it is now. MEP numbers based on population of member states.
2. European council: MEPs elect 2 representatives per member state to act as a check and balance for the parliament. Run as a publicly responsible body.
3. European Commission disbanded and European Civil Service replaced it with powers similar to those of UK Civil Service.
4. European president elected across the entire EU by public vote and could stand for a maximum of three, three year terms.
5. All member state responsibility for monetary, fiscal, tax, health, defence, industry and migration given up to the governing bodies of the EU.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk