I think that is exactly where most of us are trying to be useful here.
Trying to explain the risks of some people's actions.
You and others, from all sides, have been consistent and persistent in your approaches, however the repetitiveness is going over the top. There is plenty on this thread to allow those open to different approaches to do their own reading and research, into the approaches adopted and championed by all sides.
To me, it looks like folks have had their say, and some. Bearing that in mind, from this point, if you want to argue the toss with others, I suggest you take it to PM.