MrsGruffy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 147
- Type of diabetes
- Type 2
- Treatment type
- Tablets (oral)
I guess for me, going it alone, means using as many sources as I can and then making my own decisions based on the best information I can find. It's not blindly following advice, even from experts. It means asking for evidence, even when that may cause offence (because it shouldn't).
I spent some time today chatting with a friend (CNS) who has 30 years experience working in an ICU with coronary care patients about statins and CAC scans. Anecdotally, she said that they have increased in popularity, but in a number of cases where the CAC score was very high, there were no blockages found. She also said all of her patients are on statins prior to their admission - which is interesting in itself I think. She did agree with me that a very low CAC score was definitely an indication of good cardiovascular health. She said none of the specialists at her hospital believe the CAC score tests have much value, but she also said that the local chap arguing in favour was unpopular with the specialists and they might be jealous of his popularity with the public, hence the resistance to use them. So it could be down to personality conflicts which are preventing a very valuable non invasive potentially life saving test from becoming more common. Just like in every other profession, I guess. Just it's a bit rough when it's people's lives at stake, isn't it? Office politics in medical specialties might kill people - now that's some research I'd like to see done!
The world has changed since doctors were Gods or thought they were. We have a lot of access to information, some good and some complete rubbish. It is difficult for a layperson to discern the good from the rubbish. All you can do is your best, and then own your decisions and take responsibility for your own health and wellbeing. I don't see there's a choice any more.
I spent some time today chatting with a friend (CNS) who has 30 years experience working in an ICU with coronary care patients about statins and CAC scans. Anecdotally, she said that they have increased in popularity, but in a number of cases where the CAC score was very high, there were no blockages found. She also said all of her patients are on statins prior to their admission - which is interesting in itself I think. She did agree with me that a very low CAC score was definitely an indication of good cardiovascular health. She said none of the specialists at her hospital believe the CAC score tests have much value, but she also said that the local chap arguing in favour was unpopular with the specialists and they might be jealous of his popularity with the public, hence the resistance to use them. So it could be down to personality conflicts which are preventing a very valuable non invasive potentially life saving test from becoming more common. Just like in every other profession, I guess. Just it's a bit rough when it's people's lives at stake, isn't it? Office politics in medical specialties might kill people - now that's some research I'd like to see done!
The world has changed since doctors were Gods or thought they were. We have a lot of access to information, some good and some complete rubbish. It is difficult for a layperson to discern the good from the rubbish. All you can do is your best, and then own your decisions and take responsibility for your own health and wellbeing. I don't see there's a choice any more.