@Chook
i did OMAD for around 6 weeks three? four? autumns ago. Was skipping B and L then eating a big meal the second I finished work at 5.30.
It didn’t really work for me.
I only lost 2 pounds in all that time, even though my food intake had dipped significantly. It seemed like my metabolism adjusts to ‘reduced calorie intake’ within about 3 days, and is only so much I can eat in one session, so ‘reduced calorie intake’ was kind of inevitable . Within a week of going back to 2 meals a day, I had regained those 2 pounds. Which I thought was hilarious/v annoying.
My bgs were (back then) still rising all morning if I didn’t eat breakfast. That happened for the whole 6 weeks. By around midday they had started to slide downwards again until I ate at 5.30. So OMAD was actually giving me higher average readings across the 24 hrs than if I ate something in the morning to prevent the steady rise, even if That was only a cup of bovril with collagen powder in it, or 2 scrambled eggs, or a lump of cheese.
I guess OMAD doesn’t work for everyone, no matter how its advocates promote it.
Mind you, now I have been carnivore for... goodness... losing track

... around 2-3 years? I could probably try again, since my morning readings are less volatile. But honestly, I can’t be bothered with the phaff.
yesterday we went to Hull and had a huge carnivorous Brazilian BBQ at the place
@Goonergal went to recently.
Fab meal.
Rump, sirloin and picanya(sp?) steak, pork ribs in lime, lamb in mint, chicken thighs in glorious garlic/herb, chilli, gammon, Brazilian sausages and a token mouthful of coleslaw.
It was my only meal that day, and I’m not wanting to eat again yet, but will probably have jambalaya for D tonight.
So maybe, if I gorge on enough BBQ meats I could do OMAD occasionally!
