- 31 women with overweight or obesity tried two schedules: early eating (8am to 4pm) and late eating (1pm to 9pm) for two weeks each.
- Insulin sensitivity and key cardiometabolic markers did not meaningfully improve in either schedule in an intended isocaloric setting.
- Meal timing shifted internal circadian timing and sleep timing, and participants still had a small unintended calorie deficit with modest weight loss, especially in the early schedule.
Time restricted eating is often promoted as a simple way to improve blood sugars and metabolism, even without thinking too much about calories.
A new controlled trial suggests the story is less magical than some headlines imply.
In the ChronoFast study, researchers ran a randomised crossover trial in 31 women with overweight or obesity.
Each person followed two different two week eating schedules: early time restricted eating (8:00 to 16:00) and late time restricted eating (13:00 to 21:00).
During the eight hour window, participants were asked to keep their usual food quality and quantity, so the main change was the clock, not the menu.
- Alternate day fasting leads to fat loss and muscle loss
- Popular 5:2 fasting diet beneficial for people with type 2 diabetes and obesity
The main result was blunt: insulin sensitivity did not differ between the early and late schedules, and there were no clinically meaningful differences in 24 hour glucose patterns, blood fats, inflammation markers or oxidative stress markers over the short intervention periods.
In other words, changing the eating window alone did not deliver the metabolic improvements many people expect.
What did change was timing biology.
The late eating schedule shifted internal circadian phase in blood monocytes and pushed sleep timing later, with a later sleep midpoint compared with the early schedule.
This matters if you are trying to align eating with sleep for comfort, routine or symptom control, even if the short term metabolic markers did not move.
Another useful detail: even though the study aimed to keep calories the same, participants ended up with a small daily calorie deficit on average in the early schedule, and they lost a modest amount of weight in both schedules, more so in the early window.
That is a reminder that time restricted eating can still help some people mainly because it can make it easier to eat less, not because the window itself automatically boosts metabolism.
- Fasting triggers changes in the gut and brain that could help delay dementia
- Research highlights intermittent fasting as an effective diet for weight loss
Bottom line: if time restricted eating helps you control snacking, manage appetite or keep a routine, it can be a practical tool.
But if your calorie intake stays the same, you should not assume an eating window will improve insulin sensitivity by itself, at least over a couple of weeks in this population.
If you use diabetes medication that can cause hypos, speak to your clinician before making big changes to meal timing.




